Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
> 
> Cami Sardinha escreveu:
>> I was thinking about this feature request. I personally greylist
>> all incoming mail but i can see merit in your idea since (apparently)
>> up to 95% of spam originates from windows based machines.
>>
>> I don't have time to write this type of functionality (it would be
>> quite a bit of work to do) so if anyone is willing to take a shot
>> at it, let me know.
> 
>     seems p0f integration with policyd would be VERY interesting. 
> Unfortunely i dont have skills for taking over the project or even this 
> feature.
> 
>     But i came with a question .... i dont know exactly how p0f works, 
> but probably it needs to see the 'real' client traffic for identifying 
> it or at least try it. Policyd, as we know, never talk with the real 
> clients. It's called from MTA (postfix in policyd case) and receives 
> only some minor informations about the connection: IP, hostname, sender, 
> recipient, etc etc.
> 
>     Question is: Would it be a policy_service the right place for p0f 
> integration ?? I mean, do policyd receives complete information p0f 
> needs for OS fingerprinting ???

The correct place to do this is inside of Policyd.

P0f needs to be running on your MX machines and it
builds a "list" of ip addresses + os. When a request
from Postfix -> Policyd arrives, Policyd will query
the p0f cache (via pipe/socket) and then apply the
necessary restrictions. It's not brain surgery to do
but i don't have the time to do it.

Cami

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
policyd-users mailing list
policyd-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/policyd-users

Reply via email to