Juan Pablo Bagnon escreveu:
i know u got a point, but setting a no limit, isnt the same as putting
a astronomical upper limit?
he just want to be sure no limit is going to be set
something from reasonable to ilogic as upper limit acts as the same
than putting no limit.
since he wanted to activate the limit so he can track the account
usage but he does not want to limit it at all.
imho
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
policyd-users mailing list
policyd-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/policyd-users
Hi!
I`ve made some tests, with limits in `0` and it worked. The system
didn`t rejected mail From the address I tested. I sent already 7 mails
and the system is throtling ok but with no limitation. I would like to
know if `0` is = `unlimited`
Yes, putting a high limit is also an alternative, but I just would like
to know if there`s a specific number that means `unlimited`. Is `0` this
number or if I send a larger number of mails the system will block me?
Thanks for the help!
Fernando S.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
policyd-users mailing list
policyd-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/policyd-users
