On 01/10/2007, Riaan Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd still be interested if you or anybody have a rough idea what > difference policyd-weight's cache makes on a system where PW already uses a > caching DNS server on localhost.. especially because the latest patch at > Version 0.1.14 beta-10 disables the PW cache for whomever wants to use > 421's as their primary go-away action. >
or, maybe that patch only applies for triggers of DEFER_STRING? (hehe, in which case I should get used to being wrong!) Riaan
