Justin wrote: > Yet another way to combat spam, very impressive!
> Justin. > On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote: >> >> Hi, I whipped up a patch for policyd-weight-devel. >> >> It adds p0f scoring support and greylisting (to be exact, user defined >> postfix action) by some rules. >> >> There are some little details missing, p0f scoring does not affect other >> scores (maybe it would help) and greylisting decisions are not cached. I'm a >> bit too busy to check it more, so I leave it up to Robert if he wants.. >> >> URL: http://hege.li/policyd-weight/greylist-p0f.diff >> >> Cheers, >> Henrik >> So far I'm lovin' it. Jan 4 08:49:54 mail postfix/policydweight[3736]: weighted check: NOT_IN_ZEN_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_NE_HELO=1.5 RESOLVED_IP_IS_NOT_HELO=1.5 (check from: .itripipod. - helo: .localhost. - helo-domain: .localhost.) FROM_NOT_FAILED_HELO(DOMAIN)=3 P0F_WINXP=2 <client=86.193.177.153> <helo=localhost> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, rate: 3.5 Jan 4 08:49:54 mail postfix/policydweight[3736]: decided action=check_greylist Jan 4 08:49:54 mail postfix/smtpd[3733]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from ALyon-254-1-38-153.w86-193.abo.wanadoo.fr[86.193.177.153]: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/help/example.com.html; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=SMTP helo=<localhost> ~~~~~ Jan 4 12:27:20 mail postfix/policydweight[3617]: weighted check: NOT_IN_ZEN_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 IN_BL_NJABL=4.25 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1 P0F_LINUX=-1 <client=83.133.120.8> <helo=r.therewarddeals.com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, rate: -2.85 Jan 4 12:27:20 mail postfix/policydweight[3617]: decided action=check_greylist Gary V ____________________________________________________________ Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
