My perspective: if 9/11 was in fact an inside job, probably the only way to break the case open is for at least two insiders to step forward with the truth, backed by evidence and documentation to support their stories. Until that happens, all the furious arguments among various schools of 9/11 skeptics and conspiracy theorists will spin their wheels, producing no meaningful effects on the political system.
As I recall, Stanley Hilton claimed at one time to have insider proof about what really happened on 9/11, but it never surfaced in public view.
I think it's useful that there are many points of view about what really happened on 9/11. I'm not attached to any particular point of view, because I simply don't know the truth. All I have are suspicions and guesswork, and suspicions and guesswork are
often wrong.
I find it curious that a number of factions among competing groups of 9/11 conspiracy theorists spend more time and energy attacking one another than they do in going after the Bush administration: this is precisely the kind of situation that COINTELPRO ops are designed to create.
What I most worry about is what is the next major move the conspirators behind 9/11, no matter who they were, are going to make. Is 9/11 Part II in the works? Will it be used to censor on the Internet any further skeptical discussion about 9/11 Part I and hammer the final nail in the coffin of American democracy? If so, we will probably be helpless to stop the course of events.
No forward progress can be made in unraveling the truth about 9/11 until
high-level players choose to act on their accord, and succeed in surviving after choosing to act. For the time being, the mainstream media have succeeded in keeping questions about 9/11 from derailing the Bush administration. They are smothering the story to death, depriving it of oxygen. They refuse to engage in discussion of any open questions about 9/11.
Bill Giltner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure that this is the place to express some thoughts only
partially related to AJ, but this is what's on my mind:
I think AJ is hurting the cause to get out the truth. I think Eric
Hufschmid is hurting the cause of truth. I think Jack Blood is
hurting the cause of truth.
I admit that my mind is somewhat influenced by the way Jones has
treated Wingtv.net, and wingtv's points criticism of GCN.
Without going on a tangent, here's my specific gripe with Terror Storm.
In discussing the crime of 9/11, when one starts adding more and more
history lessons, more and more charges that this is all part of the
NWO, I submit that all the hype of history, conspiracy, and grand
schemes tends to push people away from opening their eyes to the basic
need to deal with 9/11.
This is especially true for those people who are not familiar with
books such as David Ray Griffin's.
It's a free country, and I'm not saying anybody (of the names
mentioned above) is intentionally saboteuring.
In additional I believe the the new film that is being so highly
touted "From Freedom to Fascism" is also a distraction from the cause
of getting questions about 9/11 treated as the most urgent activity
that must happen in the US now.
--- In political-research@yahoogroups. , Sean McBridecom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]..> wrote:
>
>
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/ >group/infowarsne ws/message/ 954
>
> The long-awaited arrival of Alex Jones' latest trend-setting
documentary has arrived! TerrorStorm delivers a powerful sucker punch
to the architects of global terrorism and how they stage false-flag
events to achieve political and sociological ends.
>
>
> _____________________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> Save and share anything you find online - Furl @ http://www.furl.net
>
__._,_.___
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
SPONSORED LINKS
| Business intelligence | Competitive intelligence | Market intelligence |
| Emotional intelligence | Military intelligence | Critical thinking |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
