> A primer on the standards of classical scientific method; as contrasted > with the methods > of its principle antagonists.> > This is what real education looks and feels like.
VMANN: scientific knowledge is not possible, as the empirical method only "disproves" previous theories; hence it is incapable of producing positive knowledge. (see below.) it is also based upon metaphysical axioms (presuppositions) which have been disproven for hundreds of years (see farther below). how's that for an education in "science?" the "religion of the age!" http://www.amazon.com/Logic-Scientific-Discovery-Routledge-Classics/dp/0415278449/sr=1-1/qid=1164413166/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-5148696-4516906?ie=UTF8&s=books The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge Classics) (Paperback) by Karl Popper http://www.amazon.com/Enquiry-concerning-Understanding-Oxford-Philosophical/dp/0198752482/sr=1-2/qid=1164413204/ref=pd_bbs_2/102-5148696-4516906?ie=UTF8&s=books An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (Oxford Philosophical Texts) (Paperback) by David Hume
