> What do you mean here, Vig? [see below: Relevance?] One definitely can > argue that Zbig has the advantage of being outside the power circles > that acted on / or had to act in the post 9/11 environment.
VMANN: so? whether or not luke is secretly evil has no relevence to the matter at hand. neither does zbig's access to the POST 911 power circles, i would suggest. As one could> definitely confront him with his own earlier decisions, BUT whatever> despot Saddam was, Iraq was secular and not "islamofascist". This should> not be allowed to slip down the memory hole. This is a very central > issue. And it is at the center of interest for many people,> > understandably. > > Now what could make you want to attack Brzezinski now, he is among the > few that has apparently been a consistent critic of the WWIII/IV > neocon strategy? And that is the reason why people are listening to Zbig > now. VMANN: well, luke and the boys also confronted willian kristol, iirc. zbig just happened to be speaking at the local YMCA. > I can't believe this mad act is a neocon directed op, but I ask myself > what feeds the heightened emotionality of this guy, his anger his > madness his prejudice and stupidity. And the only thing that comes to > mind in this context is the constant fear rap and ideas from right wing > circles. VMANN: what evidence is there of heightened emotionality, prejudice and/or stupidity? also, give relevance. > What is this guy's intent? What makes him so sure that Zbig is the > ultimate evil NOW? The only motive I can see is he does not want people > to listen to him, why??? Is he supporting the government, the war on > terror? > Don't you agree it was a badly planned and stupid act? VMANN: well, to be honest, seeing these young kids doing this stuff warms my heart. i was in a similar position with the feminazis, back in the day. vigilius haufniensis
