[Nice post -- summarizes my position exactly on the issue of how the towers
fell.]
zebra77a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "zebra77a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:04:08 -0000
Subject: [911TruthAction] Re: Pugliese and Others vs. the 9/11 Truth Movement
-was: "American Free Press"
They are smearing false dialetics. Steven
Jones is correct, there are
pictures of support columns that were sheared at 60 degree angles, and
mass spectrometry showing that Thermate was indeed used on the support
columns.
However there is also staggering evidence showing that cars burned up
at a distance around their engine blocks, support columns were melted
and twisted, buses caught fire around their engine blocks etc...
Additionally the radio mast dropped into the building about 1/2 to 1
second before the tower itself collapses. It could only have been
caused if the towers themselves had their support columns destroyed.
Do not take my word for any of it, check it out yourself.
The point is it is a effective 'noice maker' to mix no-plane theories
and other BS with real science and research and evidence, and it
dilutes and distracts from the legitimate research.
I do not support any thesis or position without the research to
support it. Lets agree on one simple thing, WTC1,2 and 7 were
deliberately demolished in a controlled demolition no matter what was
used. The hologram no-plane theory is a great way to keep the public
at bay and to discredit real evidence and research.
But do not think that ONLY thermate was used, I think there is a lot
more, and Dr Deagle has some excellent research to support it.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark S Bilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In 2002, Michael Pugliese was attacking Michel Chossudovsky,
> Mike Ruppert, and Cynthia McKinney, for what he called their
> "right-wing conspiracy theories" about 9/11 and the Neocons.
> Now he's popped up again, smearing Alex Jones and the American
> Free Press. Apparently he's been reactivated.
>
> In addition to Pugliese, 9/11 truth researchers (especially
> Steven Jones and David Ray Griffin) are being attacked by about
> two dozen agents in the Webfairy/Haupt/etc No-Planes-Hit-the-WTC
> COINTELPRO gang, and also by Ed Ward, who is currently shouting
> all over the Net that the WTC was blown up by (nonexistent)
> "micro H-Bombs".*
>
> This in addition to the usual smear articles in the mainstream
> press.
>
> We sure must be doing something right!
>
> Mark
>
> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911
>
> * The above-normal levels of tritium in the debris actually
> came from the smashed emergency exit glow signs in the planes.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:45:16PM -0600, Michael Pugliese wrote:
> >On 6/29/07, Sean McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, I've never seen a physical copy of the American Free Press.
> >> If there is a particular article from it which you would like
to discuss, be my guest.
> >
> > On your list there was at least 131 cites of that neo-Nazi faux
> >populist rag but, you who claim to have read hundreds of articles in
> >Commentary dating back to the 40's, have never bothered to check it
> >out directly?
> > Is your standard, well if it opposes what I oppose, I don't care if
> >its underlying politics is Fascist? That would be as politically
> >stupid as old sixties radicals I've known, who grew to hate liberal
> >Democrats like LBJ so much, they had books by John Birch Society
> >writers on their bookshelves. Or old Stalinists, I've known, so bitter
> >in their hatred of Trotskyists and Democratic Socialists (who were
> >correct in their critique of the USSR, when the CPUSA and its fellow
> >travellers persisted in their illusions) they would also cite
> >Right-Wing agitprop against their leftist opponents.
> >
> >--
> >Michael Pugliese
>
