There's nothing wrong with the article, any more than there is nothing wrong 
with an article with an article from 2002 promoting a new rock group that's 
being touted as the next supergroup, but which winds out disappearing from 
public view within a few years.
Same with the attempts by Hamer discussed in the APA article--it just never 
panned out, an in fact has hit a brick wall, although silly press hype about 
Hamer's work at the time ("Gay gene found!!") were not really Hamer's fault.

Sean McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                  Ok -- 
what's wrong with this particular article?

tigerbengalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
                             Actually, I very much consider the American 
Psychological Association to be on the fringe, at least scientifically 
speaking. I'm not a science worshipper, and find plenty problematic with Big 
Science, but no one in the scientific community would consider the APA terribly 
relevant to scientific concerns or research, except maybe wonks in Big Pharma, 
to the extent that the APA can help them push Prozac.

Sean McBride  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
                             [Behavioral genetics is very mainstream these days 
-- unless you consider the American  Psychological Association to be on the 
fringe.]

http://www.apa.org/monitor/sep02/genes.html

APA Monitor on Psychology
Volume 33, No. 8 September 2002

APA forms working group on genetics research issues

Members of the BSA working group

Searching for genes that explain our personalities

Identifying such genes could eliminate the distinction psychologists make 
between personality and psychopathology.

BY BETH AZAR

Finding any real "personality" genes is decades away. But researchers have a 
good start.

In fact, more researchers are jumping into the complex fray of behavioral 
genetics each year, fueled by the  hope that identifying genes related to 
personality traits will not only help them better understand what makes people 
tick but also what goes wrong when normal "ticking" turns pathological.

The goal is to discover  genes that affect brain functions that in turn affect 
how people interact  with their environments. The research is slowed by the 
complexity of the search: Many genes are responsible for various aspects of 
people's temperament, and those genes appear to interact with each other in 
complicated ways that influence several traits at once--and then likely only in 
very subtle ways, with any one gene likely accounting for only 1 or 2 percent 
of the variance in a trait.

Researchers do, however, believe that their work will eventually pay off and 
they'll have a new, more comprehensive, understanding of personality and 
psychopathology as well as the complex play between genes and environment in 
shaping personality.

Progress to date

Scientists  have a strong foundation for their search for personality genes 
from the years of basic psychology and neuroscience studies that have explored 
just exactly what personality is and how personality-related behaviors might be 
 influenced by specific neural mechanisms. And although researchers  still 
debate exactly how to define personality, they have identified certain core 
personality dimensions that are consistent across cultures, including 
novelty-seeking, neuroticism and agreeableness.

Intriguing to people has been research in animals and humans that links certain 
neurotransmitters with some of these dimensions or traits. For example, many 
studies have found a connection between high levels of the neurotransmitter 
dopamine and behaviors related to novelty-seeking. That gives researchers a 
place to start looking--genes related to dopamine--among the nearly 50,000 in 
the human genome.

To date, there are only two real candidate genes that anyone speaks of  with 
any confidence. The first potential link is between some behaviors related to 
the Big-Five trait novelty-seeking and a gene that produces the protein 
responsible for creating a dopamine receptor called DRD4. While some  studies 
have failed to replicate this connection, others have identified  a link 
between the DRD4 gene and other traits linked to novelty-seeking, such as drug 
abuse and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. The indication is that this 
gene--or perhaps some other gene related to it--may influence all these 
interrelated characteristics.

The second candidate--linked to the Big Five trait neuroticism--is commonly 
called the "Prozac" gene because it produces a protein related to the 
neurotransmitter serotonin. Also known as the serotonin transporter gene or 
5-HTTLPR, it has the strongest evidence linking it to neuroticism and other 
anxiety-related traits, such as harm avoidance.

Even so, the gene appears to account for only about 1  to 2 percent of the 
variance for these traits, says National Cancer Institute molecular biologist 
Dean Hamer, PhD, one of the first scientists to search for personality genes. 
"If that's as good as it gets," he says, "everything  else is likely worse." 
That means perhaps hundreds of genes influence  each of our personality traits 
ever so slightly.

In fact, the work is so difficult from a molecular biology point of view, Hamer 
is all but abandoning it.

"After 10 years or so, it's quite clear to me that at least for most traits 
there are a very large number of genes involved," he says. The only area he'll 
continue working on is sexual orientation. There he feels there's a better 
chance of finding just a few key genes.

Blurring lines between 'normal' and pathological

The difficulty of the work isn't stopping others who anticipate the promise of 
a greater understanding of personality as well as psychopathology. Already, 
research has begun to blur  the traditional line delineating personality and 
psychopathology as separate entities.

For example, over the past decade, studies have established a connection 
between high scores on the standard personality trait of  neuroticism and major 
depression. In fact, high neuroticism scores can predict  whether someone will 
develop major depression, says Kenneth Kendler, MD, director of the Psychiatric 
Genetics Research Program at Virginia Commonwealth University, who conducted 
some of the research showing this link. Other studies by Kendler suggest that 
neuroticism and depression share as much as 60 percent of their genes. In fact, 
most researchers in this area expect they'll find that many of the genes that 
influence general personality also play a role in many forms of psychopathology.

Such findings would suggest that conditions such as depression, anxiety 
disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder are one end of a 
continuum that includes normal  personality traits.

"Once we get genes for psychopathology, we'll get genes for personality" and 
vice versa, says Robert Plomin, PhD, deputy director of the Social, Genetic and 
Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre in the  Institute of Psychiatry at 
King's College, London. "At least for more common  disorders, such as 
hyperactivity, all the evidence points to a continuum of traits. Activity and 
hyperactivity are just variants of each other."

Understanding environment through genes

The research could also revolutionize how psychologists define psychopathology, 
which is currently diagnosed by symptoms, says Plomin.

"All our concern about diagnosis based on symptoms might be off base," he says. 
Instead, psychopathology could be defined and diagnosed based on genes and 
their interaction with the environment to produce certain outcomes. This would 
allow clinicians to detect people at risk for a certain disorder and, perhaps, 
prevent symptoms from  ever occurring by modifying a person's environment.

Of course, the reality of using genetic markers to diagnose psychiatric 
disorders--not to mention to assess personality traits--is likely decades away. 
In fact, some  researchers think it's unlikely because of the number of genes 
involved in any one  trait.

"One can fantasize about replacing self-report inventories with genetic assays 
to assess personality traits," says psychologist Jeff McCrae, PhD, a 
personality psychologist at the National Institute on Aging (NIA), "but I doubt 
it will ever become a reality. The link between genes and traits is too 
imperfect, and we would need to discover all the genes associated with each 
trait and how they interact in order to come up with a gene-based personality 
assessment." More likely--and equally important for personality researchers--is 
the idea that they will be able to include genetic markers among the criteria 
they use to validate their personality  measures.

"[Genetic markers] could provide one more objective indicator against which to 
evaluate our instruments," says McCrae.

In addition, finding genes is sure to help researchers better understand how 
environment and  genes interact to shape personality. That's the idea behind 
research by  McCrae and his long-time NIA collaborator Paul Costa, PhD. They 
have developed the Five-Factor Theory, which says that personality traits 
themselves are genetically based, but that characteristic adaptations--habits, 
beliefs, values, self-concepts, roles, relationships, skills--are shaped 
jointly by genetically determined traits and the environment.

Once they and other researchers pin down at least some of the genetics of the 
traits, they could much more easily evaluate the environmental contribution to 
these characteristic adaptations.

"For example," says McCrae, "we might find that people high in Gene A 
everywhere in the world cried when they  were depressed, but that they only 
attempted suicide in certain cultures."

That might, he says, suggest that the environment has little to do with the 
physiological expression of affect, but is crucial for understanding and 
preventing  suicide.

Though concrete answers are far off, "Understanding the  genes and their 
interactions will most certainly also help us understand environmental 
influences," says University of Illinois personality and social psychologist Ed 
Diener, PhD. "We will be able to see when the environment 'overrides' the genes 
and why. And we will be able to see how environmental variations interact with 
genetic variations."

Beth Azar is a writer in Portland, Ore.

PsychNET®
© 2002 American Psychological Association


     
             
   

---------------------------------
It's here! Your new message!
Get  new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
     
            

     
                       

       
---------------------------------
Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. 

Reply via email to