-------- Original Message --------
Subject: A Touch of "The Hidden Hand"? - Please read and forward - it
could help massively.
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:23:40 +0100
From: Andrew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A Touch of ?The Hidden Hand??
*Is the Next False Flag Attack on US Soil Near?*
Andrew Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), July 28^th 2007
*_Please Forward/Re-post far and wide and ASAP_*
I write this piece having some feelings of guilt, which may seem silly
or strange, but that is how I feel.
I was, on July 26^th , scheduled to chat with a man called Ambrose Lane
on a show called "We Ourselves", which goes out on a channel called ?XM
Channel 169 - The Power?
(http://www.xmradio.com/onxm/channelpage.xmc?ch=169). Ambrose has other
unrelated shows on WPFW a Pacifica station covering the Washington D.
C. metro area as far north as Bailtimore and as far south as Richmond
VA. Ambrrose's shows are archieved at
http://www.weourselves.org/show/index.html. However, the call for me to
go on the show on July 26^th , at 8pm (BST), never came - and I wondered
why. The following day, I found out. The Network "XM Channel 169" which
hosted the "We Ourselves" show had cancelled it and fired the host
(Ambrose Lane). This came as a shock to everyone and, as far as I know
at the time of writing, XM have given Ambrose Lane no credible reason
for their sudden decision.
In this article, I have tried to put together the main points that I was
hoping to have discussed in the interview.
On the show, I was due to be speaking with Dr Judy Wood as well - about
the latest evidence she has found which shows that an advanced but
unknown type of Directed Energy Weapon was used to destroy /most/ of the
WTC complex (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html).
Over the last few months and weeks I have been in regular communication
with Dr Judy Wood regarding her ongoing study and presentation of this
evidence. There are a number of reasons for counting this as the
strongest hypothesis - it explains the most evidence, such as:
* Lack of large debris (most of the material the towers were made of
was almost instantly ?dustified?, with only a few steel girders
left ? the ?steel was shipped to china? statements seem to have
been a cover story - as we have seen no evidence this ?shipping?
actually happened).
* Lack of molten metal (this is commonly spoken of and is mentioned
in some 9/11 truth videos and testimonies, but there is no
photographic evidence of its existence. Indeed, the photographs
that Dr Wood has shown us contradict the idea of its existence.
For example, there is no ?steam explosion? when rain fell on the
area where molten metal was supposed to have been in the immediate
period following the destruction of the WTC).
* The Bath tub was not sufficiently damaged by the enormous amount
of debris which should?ve fallen into it ? we know that Lower
Manhattan was never flooded.
* ?Toasted Cars? ? over ½ a mile from the WTC.
You can see all the evidence laid out at http://www.drjudywood.com
<http://www.drjudywood.com/>.
Following a number of stories that have recently appeared in the Press
and on the Web, and following discussions with a mutual friend of Dr
Wood and myself, Frank Ferguson, we had developed a concern that this
weapon (because we accept it exists) could be used again in the next
False Flag operation - perhaps to "fake" the "threatened" Al Qaida
Nuclear attack - on US soil in, shall we say, a very significant place ?
such as Washington DC.
Our concerns were amplified in recent days, as we have heard more and
more ?terror talk? from the likes of Michael Chertoff e.g.
http://www.newsday.com/news/printedition/nation/chi-070710chertoff,0,6464324,print.story
in which he is quoted as saying:
/"I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased
risk?Summertime seems to be appealing to them," he said of al-Qaeda. "We
do worry that they are rebuilding their activities."/
Also, Air Force Gen. Victor "Gene" Renuart has said:
(http://infowars.com/articles/terror/dhs_general_attack_could_happen_any_day.htm)
/?that while the terrorism threat within the nation's boundaries has
increased in the past year. He added, "Am I concerned that this will
happen this summer, I have to be concerned that it could happen any day."/
Additionally, on 19^th July Paul Craig Roberts -- a former Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan was quoted as saying:
(http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Oldline_Republican_warns_somethings_in_works_0719.html)
/"The administration figures themselves and prominent Republican
propagandists ... are preparing us for another 9/11 event or series of
events," he said. "You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda is not
going to do it, it is going to be orchestrated."/
Added to these ominous statements, one of the main items we wished to
discuss was an article that appeared in the Washington Post on 10 May
2007, entitled ?Bush Changes Continuity Plan?
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/09/AR2007050902719.html)
In this article it mentions:
/?The prospect of a nuclear bomb being detonated in Washington without
warning, whether smuggled in by terrorists or a foreign government, has
been cited by many security analysts as a rising concern since the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks.? /
towards the end of the article it says:
/?White House's Homeland Security Council staff. [Frances Fargos]
Townsend is to produce an implementation plan *within 90 days*. Homeland
Security Secretary Michael Chertoff will continue to coordinate
operations and activities, the directive said.?/
An item of particular interest to me which has received no mainstream
and little if any alternative media coverage (such as on Infowars.com),
is contained in portions of a discussion that took place at the
Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference on June 24, 2007. This bizarre
discussion was between Brigham Young University (BYU) Physics Professor,
Steven E Jones and Dr William Deagle. In it, Dr Deagle stated that ?22
US cities have been pre-wired with nukes.? They were also discussing the
possibility of ?another 9/11 type attack? and, Prof Jones was heard to
say (about 30 minutes into the discussion):
(http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/Jones_Deagle_transcript.html
)
/?One other exercise is that we have learned that with evidence we can
learn a great deal so if there is an event and - we won?t even name a
city - lets just say an American city - blamed on Iran, certainly there
will be 9/11 truthers nearby and I hope they realize the importance of
collecting a sample [right] whether that?s dust ? [also radiation] right
- having a radiation detector handy if you?ve got one ? whether it?s
Geiger - if you send me a sample I?d be glad to look at it and I?m sure
you would too, Bill . So, if there is such an event the point ? the
reason I?m emphasizing this is because it?s a bit of a warning if there
are perpetrators thinking about ? such another 9/11 they?d better think
twice because 9/11 truthers are out there ? we?re watching. We will get
samples ? we know what to do ? evidence-based studies ? we can do very
quickly and we can put an end to lies - on the next 9/11 if it
[inaudible] ? which I hope we?ll avoid? /
(the page above links to the Google-video of the discussion. An
audio-only copy can be heard here http://tinyurl.com/29xtwz ). These
really are extraordinary statements to come from two supposedly
well-qualified scientists.
There seems to have been a concerted and probably co-ordinated effort on
the Internet to either attack Dr Wood herself, or divert attention from
the data she presents. For example, the new association called
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/) has
not discussed or mentioned in any detail Prof Wood?s extensive study ?
even though Prof Wood herself has degrees in engineering subjects.
Ancillary to the study of the WTC photographic evidence that Dr Wood has
studied, it has been found that a number of companies that NIST
contracted to contribute to the NCSTAR 1 report have links to Directed
Energy research or products. One example is ARA (Applied Research
Associates ? www.ara.com <http://www.ara.com/>) who produced the plane
crash animations. They also are a defence contractor and Silver Level
Founding Sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) -
see http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html)
As a note to this area of study, former transport secretary, Norman
Mineta, is frequently quoted as someone who tried to highlight anomalies
in the story of VP Cheney?s account of what happened with the supposed
plane which hit the Pentagon. (Mineta stated to Lee Hamilton, of the
9/11 Commission, that Mineta was in a bunker when Cheney apparently
/declined/ to give a shoot down order for a plane that was about to
crash into the Pentagon ? see
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/alibis/cheney.html) Note that /if/
the events went as Mineta described, the fellow coming and going from
the room wouldn't have had time to leave the room and return. If the
"plane" were actually travelling at 550 mph, 10 miles is covered in
about 1 minute. Part of that time would be spent in the dialog, "do the
orders still stand?" So, it would seem unlikely that this fellow would
have time to even leave the room and return for the next dialog. It
turns out that Mineta himself was former Vice President of Lockheed
Martin (see http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/mineta-bio.html) ? one
of the world?s biggest defence contractors and also one the primary
contractors in the Airborne Laser Project which is described as
?America's first directed energy weapon system?
(see http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_000408a.html
<http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2000/news_release_000408a.html>)
Conclusion
We therefore seem to have a range of evidence that a directed energy
weapon was used as the primary method of destruction a number of the WTC
buildings. We have also seen the links between certain people who would
seem to support ?9/11 truth? and directed energy contracts or projects.
We have seen a number of statements suggesting that a large-scale or
nuclear attack on the USA by Al Qaida is imminent. Within certain
quarters of the 9/11 truth movement, we have seen the suggestion that
?mini-nukes? were used in the destruction on the WTC and that US cities
already have them ?pre-wired?.
If we posit that the mini-nuke idea is another ?cover story? for what
happened on 9/11, and we consider that the Directed Energy Weapon might
be orbital, it would potentially allow the 9/11 perpetrators to fake a
nuke attack on a target of their choice. The main point here is that any
/real/ nukes being moved by land, air or sea would probably be, at some
point, detected if any of the current security systems actually function
in any useful way. However, the Directed Energy Weapon cannot be
detected by any of the usual land-based systems (and who would be
looking for it anyway).
If the 9/11 perps have a plan similar to what I have suggested above,
then it makes sense that they would try to shut down any discussion of
ideas which may uncover it, and they would try to attack or discredit
those involved in such discussion. I am therefore given to wonder, was
this the motive behind Ambrose Lane?s show being cancelled on the very
day on which these issues were due to be discussed?
There is, of course, the possibility that part or parts of this
conjecture could be entirely wrong ? I hope all of it is wrong actually.
Weighed against the possibility that a false flag attack on US soil
equalling or exceeding the scale of 9/11 will happen soon, am I, as the
author of this article, prepared to be criticised for being
unrealistically rash, extremist or plain silly in my conclusions? You
bet your top, middle and bottom dollar I am.
Please forward this article to everyone who may take it seriously ? as
soon as possible.
