Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: Conflict Of Interest?
Report Says Goldman Sachs ‘Among Biggest Beneficiaries’ Of Paulson’s
Bailout via Think Progress by Satyam on 9/22/08
In making his push to administer the largest federal bailout of Wall
Street in history, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is seeking
unfettered authority. McClatchy poses the question today, “can you
trust a Wall Street veteran with a Wall Street bailout?,” referring to
Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs:

But the conflicts are also visible. Paulson has surrounded himself with
former Goldman executives as he tries to navigate the domino-like
collapse of several parts of the global financial market. And others
have gone off to lead companies that could be among those that receive
a bailout.

In late July, Paulson tapped Ken Wilson, one of Goldman’s most senior
executives, to join him as an adviser on what to about problems in the
U.S. and global banking sector. Paulson’s former assistant secretary,
Robert Steel, left in July to become head of Wachovia, the
Charlotte-based bank that has hundreds of millions of troubled mortgage
loans on its books.

Goldman Sachs cashed in under Paulson, with earnings in 2005 of $5.6
billion; Paulson made more than $38 million that year. A 2005 annual
report shows that “Goldman was still a significant player” in issuing
mortgage bonds. The conflict of interest is increasingly clear today,
as Bloomberg reports that “Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley
may be among the biggest beneficiaries” of Paulson’s bailout plan:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley may be among the biggest
beneficiaries of the $700 billion U.S. plan to buy assets from
financial companies while many banks see limited aid, according to Bank
of America Corp.

“Its benefits, in its current form, will be largely limited to
investment banks and other banks that have aggressively written down
the value of their holdings and have already recognized the attendant
capital impairment,” Jeffrey Rosenberg, Bank of America’s head of
credit strategy research, wrote in a report today, without identifying
particular investment banks.”

McClatchy adds that the administration’s draft law “also would preclude
court review of steps Paulson might take.” Joshua Rosner of Graham
Fisher & Co. remarked that Treasury’s ability to “without oversight,
determine [that] a financial institution [is] an agent of the
government” could be used to mask previous illegal activities at
Goldman. The Wonk Room notes six months ago, Paulson claimed, “our
banks and investment banks, are strong.”

The conflict of interest provides all the more reason for the bailout
legislation in Congress to have more stringent oversight that the
administration opposes.

Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Think Progress using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

Reply via email to