d.b. Why is it important that, in your opinion, Mr. Gibson is an MSM hack, and WHAT is it more important than?
I know, and being more concerned about superficial appearances rather than substance and truth will be the death of us all yet. On Sep 11, 7:50 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's more definitive than "all options are on the table"? Even the > MSMers should understand that, just substitute "lattes" for > "options." > > Can't really comment on Lincoln/Douglas, I wasn't there. More > importantly, Charlie Gibson is an MSM hack, which made it simple for > Sarah to fill the shoes of either Lincoln or Douglas. > > Interesting, my 80-year-old aunt, a fan of Gibson, called to say how > disappointed she was in his condescending attitude - that he was not > "himself" - like he was a "hostile interrogator." No, Aunt, I said, > you just met the real Charlie Gibson, an elitist buffoon of the > highest Marxist order. > > So you see, Jimmy Rocket, appearances ARE important in the minds of > everyday people, even fans of the extraordinary and blinding Mr. > Gibson. Because he sat there like a schoolboy twisting his very > expensive shoe into a state of appalling dizziness. > > On Sep 11, 7:37 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > d.b. > > > The only answer she actually gave was one i could teach to a fucking > > parrot, "all options are on the table". That's it period, the sum > > total. > > > The rest of your post concerned only how she looked and your opinion > > of how Gibson looked. Sorry, but BFD. Not exactly a Lincoln/Douglas > > debate. Maybe, just maybe he asked the question again because he > > wanted something more definitive than "all options on on the table". > > > On Sep 11, 6:30 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sep 11, 7:13 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > man I forgot it was on. did she kick his butt? put him in his place? > > > > Polite but firm, looked him straight in the eye... said she was ready > > > to take over as president if necessary. Gibson pressed on the Bush > > > doctrine of "preemption," specifically regarding Pakistan - she > > > responded "all options are [remain] on the table." He asked again, > > > claiming he was lost in the avalanche of words, he, and intellectual, > > > an elitist, a man of astounding stature - "lost." > > > > Interesting, Sarah looked confident, assured - Gibson did not, > > > constantly twisting his foot, while trying to appear superior, > > > elitist. Still, he seemed almost appalled by her directness, her stare > > > - like, 'how dare she!' And looking down his nose like a typical > > > liberal schmuck just out of NYU. > > > > I suspect Gibson wants a do-over. With all his wonderments he couldn't > > > rattle her.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
