First of all her responsibility is to the people not McCain, whose responsibility is also to the people. Secondly, if you don't know the tenets on which the party you represent stand upon you should not be eligible to hold a position of authority within the organization, such is the desperation of her appointment.
Such is the stultification of political consciousness in the US that her referral to Bushes world doctrine goes unnoticed. So the US has a world doctrine has it? That's right it includes preemptive strikes for one thing doesn't it? Palin saw nothing wrong with a world doctrine which can only mean a doctrine of the US doing as it pleases, when it pleases in line with the interests of US business. In other words the world must cower in subservience to the diktats of US imperialism. What a woman, mother and humanitarian of the year material. She's got the lot hasn't she? Ignorance and stupidity bound up with a big dose of Christian fundamentalist lovin'...........what the world needs now is Sarah's love sweet love PS I don't support Obama either. And whatever his short comings maybe, they don't in anyway detract from Palin's. On Sep 14, 3:07 pm, MANOJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is ABC ? > > American Broadcasting Company or the first three letters of English > alphabet. > > When Sen. Barack Obama can make a trip abroad to boost his foreign > policy credentials, why Gov. Palin can't do the same. > > Why the VP should know about the word 'Bush Doctrine', when every > American know the actual statement as it was part of President Bush's > speech. > > There is one person, who need to be satisfied about her capability. He > is her boss - Sen McCain. > > The point to be noted that in worst case American people might feel > comfortable in considering a VP Palin to take on the job training; but > they will certainly remain uncomfortable for a President Obama to take > on the job training. > > -MP > > On Sep 12, 7:09 am, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sarah Palin, in her ABC interview, displayed her political ignorance > > and incompetence by failing to answer the most basic of political > > questions regarding her attitude towards the ‘Bush Doctrine”. > > > What is Bushes doctrine? Bushes doctrine is that of the political, > > social and economic policies of the Republican Party. He is elected as > > president to carry out the doctrine of the Republican party not of > > George Bush the individual (lord knows, he can’t read nor write). > > > The answer to the question, if she was a competent politician and not > > a clown, would have simply needed to be, George Bushes doctrine is > > that of the Republican Party and I am a Republican. That is the answer > > of a diplomat of a a bona-fide politician that has a political > > understanding an ideology that goes beyond “God’s will” as the all > > pervasive answer to everything. > > > However, so badly compromised is this moribund corpse of an > > organization, that it is at present trying to distance itself from the > > disasters it has orchestrated under the Bush leadership, attempting to > > sell the idea that the disastrous Bush doctrine is not the failure of > > the Republican Party, but the fault of a puppet of the party who is > > functioning illiterate. > > > It is therefore possible that Palin could not answer this question > > because of the thoroughly compromised state of this soon to be defunct > > organization. Whatever the reason the fish stinks from the head. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
