They were subpoenaed, however Palin told her husband and staff not to cooperate, HER emails are the 'copies' of the emails being subpoenaed.
On Sep 17, 7:02 pm, "Vox Itar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:36 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > yep, but tampered is tampered. chain of evidence is broken. did SHE > > ever see or know about the back-up?? if not, or claimed not, no good. > > First, those emails are not part of any "chain of evidence" unless someone > in law enforcement had previously subpoenaed them or if Palin had been told > they were evidence and not to delete them. > > Second, as indicated by Gaar, all anyone with subpoena power would have to > do is issue a subpoena to yahoo for the emails - they would have them on > their end, most certainly. > > This is just more silliness, and I'm more than happy to help debunk yet > another Sarah smear. > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
