> If Douchebag Palin is innocent, then there should be no problem. I > think there IS a problem, however, and that is why they've gone to the > bunkers.
Or, it could be because the investigation team of French and Elton can't be trusted. >From Alaska’s Joint Judiciary Committee hearing on Sept 12: Investigator Steven Branchflower admitted he had ceded control of his subpoena list to Sen. Hollis French (D.) during Alaska’s Joint Judiciary Committee September 12 hearing that was scheduled to approve subpoena requests. French is a partisan who has endorsed Palin’s Democratic presidential ticket rival Barack Obama for president and is actively supporting his candidacy. Lawmakers approved 13 of Branchflower’s subpoena requests that day, which included one for Palin’s husband, Todd. Four other subpoenas were approved for aides Branchflower believes participated in a meeting called by Palin’s former chief of staff Mike Tibbles where Wooten’s firing was allegedly discussed. Rep. David Guttenberg (D.) asked Branchflower why he was requesting subpoenas for only those people attending the meeting and not Tibbles himself. Branchflower said he would "have to defer that question to Mr. French." "I put the list together with, talking to Mr. French", Branchflower added. Sen. Gene Therriault (R.) told Branchflower, "I don’t understand why you would have to defer that question to Sen. French. If it’s your list you’re in complete control of the list, then why can’t you answer the question?" Branchflower had no explanation. He only offered, "I’m not sure why his name was removed. My initial request was to have him on the list." At that point, French interjected. "It appeared to me there wasn’t the political will to subpoena Tibbles." "Something’s fishy here," Therriault replied. "I mean either Mr. Branchflower conducts his investigation without direction, and now we know he’s been directed on the date and changing what he’s doing and how he’s doing it because of the time pressure he is feeling. And now we’re hearing that people that he’s trying to get information from, there’s direction going on on that, too." On Sep 22, 5:07 pm, PoliticalAmazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's called following the law. We don't get to pick and choose which > laws we follow based on whether we agree with them. > > If Douchebag Palin is innocent, then there should be no problem. I > think there IS a problem, however, and that is why they've gone to the > bunkers. > > ---------- > > On Sep 22, 1:42 pm, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:53 AM, PoliticalAmazon > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > Of course, Todd Palin, "The First Douchebag," refusing to perform on a > > > subpoena has them REALLY ticked off. > > > "refusing to perform?" what, like a trained seal? LOL. no wonder you > > don't like him, PA...anyone that doesn't slurp at the teet of the DNC is to > > be maligned by you, it seems. i like the first dude...loved his interview > > with Greta - he's cool. i love the fact that he's standing up to the > > bullies of the DNC who want to politicize a personnel matter that is > > supposed to be handled administratively, and i love, LOVE the fact that > > there ain't shit the Obamabots can do about it....GO GET 'EM SARAH!!!- Hide > > quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
