I am just showing you and yours for what you really are holly... Yours have blocked progress of Drilling for many Decades now, and I am going to continue to point that out until November 4th.
Hopefully, intelligent people will finally be fed up with giving those like you any Political power at all. We can only Pray. On Sep 23, 12:30 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gaar, > > Of course I acknowledge your position in the sense of the definition > of "acknowledge" being "to take notice of". How could I NOT "notice" > your position. There, you have what you want. > Now, what is it i want? > Negioate? What is it we are negioating FOR? > You my boy, are not in any more of a position to decide where govt. > funds are allocated and what the priorties are than I am. You are > suffering from delusions of significance again. Are you claiming to be > a spokesman for the Republican party and/or the White house? > > On Sep 23, 11:39 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And yet... > > > You cannot answer what that means in "Real World" Events. > > > I ask what it would take to get YOU to say Drilling is ok, and you > > can't come up with a clear answer, as always. > > > And then you claim you have. > > > Imagine that. > > > So my position, with you, at this point is... > > > Until you can acknowledge MY position, and give me what I want, I am > > not going to give you what you want. > > > That way, you get to see what it is like to have to put up with > > someone who is unmoving in their position, as you have shown yourself > > to be. > > > So until YOU can Learn to negotiate in good faith, no more Government > > Subsidies for any of YOUR Programs for renewable Energy until you bend > > on Drilling for more Oil. > > > Obviously Idiots like you need a Lesson or two in Compromise. > > > On Sep 23, 7:46 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Gaar, > > > > Yes, it's a clear answer. How is it my fault you have poor reading > > > comprehension skills? > > > You've never heard of priortizing? You only able to think or do or > > > consider one thing at a time? Ever heard of the concept of multi- > > > tasking? > > > What is your problem with my statement? > > > > You have my answer. Tough fucking shit if you don't like it. > > > Like you say, I can always simply decide a question does not "need' to > > > be answered, or it is too "silly" to answered, or it has already been > > > addressed adequately on another thread. Right? LMFAO!! > > > > On Sep 23, 12:26 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 22, 9:15 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > No, it means I think it should be a lower priority than both > > > > > conservation and developing alternatives to oil. > > > > > That was your answer, and you believe that is "clear"?!?!?!? > > > > > And you wonder why I call you ignorant, and a Loony Liberal? > > > > > What the Hell "priority" does it "need", in your tiny little Loony > > > > Liberal mind, in order to get you to agree that we should DRILL > > > > NOW?!?!?!?!? > > > > > Now, what do you want to bet you can't answer a simple FUCKING > > > > QUESTION, yet again?!?!?!?!? > > > > > Oh wait, I shouldn't need to ASK because, according to your tiny > > > > little Brain, you believe you have already been "clear" about your > > > > answer, so what question could ANYONE possibly have on your 'concise' > > > > opinion, as stated?!?!?!?!? > > > > > Yeah, I have to say, you have proven, yet again, that you are a > > > > complete Idiot.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
