mark, You understand it was a bi-partisan panel, right? So, how could it be a partisan political attack? Explain that to me. At WORST, it is a BI- PARTISAN political attack.
On Oct 11, 7:19 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it is no more than a partisan political attack. nothing more. > > On Oct 11, 7:55 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > From the Article.. > > > ================== > > > Mrs Palin's lawyer said that the report had not been conclusive. > > > "In order to violate the ethics law, there has to be some personal > > gain," said Thomas Van Flein. > > > "Mr Branchflower has failed to identify any financial gain." > > > And Alaskan state Senator Gary Stevens, a Republican, said there were > > "some problems" with the finding. > > > On Oct 11, 1:18 am, creusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7662820.stm > > > > Would you trust this woman whose redneck behaviour is practised in the > > > halls of government? Who can't dissociate personal animosity from > > > public duty? And then has the gall to throw mud at the Dems? McCain > > > and Palin are showing themselves to be the mudwrestlers that redneck > > > America loves to watch...- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
