brunner is doing her best to steal this election for nobama.  to her
dismay she has been caught.

On Oct 14, 6:00 am, "[ the last  patriotic Republican  ]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner on Voter Rights, Faulty
> Electronic Voting Machines, Voter Fraud and GOP Voter 
> Challengeshttp://www.truthout.org/101308VA
> Ohio is a key swing state that ended up deciding the outcome of the
> 2004 election. But the state was riddled with voting problems, ranging
> from breakdowns in electronic voting machines to accusations of
> widespread voter disenfranchisement. We speak to Democrat Jennifer
> Brunner, who was elected secretary of state of Ohio in November 2006.
>
>     Juan Gonzalez: Ohio is a key swing state that ended up deciding
> the outcome of the 2004 election. But the state was riddled with
> voting problems, ranging from breakdowns in electronic voting machines
> to accusations of widespread voter disenfranchisement.
>
>     Amy Goodman: Democrat Jennifer Brunner was elected Secretary of
> State in Ohio in November of 2006. She replaced Republican Kenneth
> Blackwell. Since then, she has faced fire from virtually every side-
> Republicans operatives, voting machine companies, voting rights groups
> and more-as she has worked to resolve some of the voting problems from
> four years ago.
>
>     Most recently, the GOP asked a federal judge on Sunday to force
> Secretary of State Brunner to match voter registration information,
> such as a driver's license number, against information in the state
> Bureau of Motor Vehicles database. Republicans filed the complaint
> Sunday as an extension of a previous action against a week-long period
> in which Ohioans could register and vote on that same day.
>
>     Juan Gonzalez: Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner joins us
> on the telephone now. Welcome to Democracy Now!
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: Thank you, Juan. Good morning, Amy.
>
>     Amy Goodman: It's good to have you with us. Why don't you talk-to
> start off by talking about what this latest controversy is, this
> lawsuit?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: This is currently pending in the federal
> district court in the Southern District of Ohio in Columbus, and the
> judge will be hearing arguments on this this morning at 11:00. The
> Republican Party had this lawsuit in place when they were fighting the-
> what we call the overlap voting, which is when absentee voting
> started, before the close of voter registration, which allowed people
> to go to an early voting site, register to vote, request an absentee
> ballot, and vote it on the spot.
>
>     In that original lawsuit, they were denied relief, first by the
> federal judge, and then again by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
> But what they did was to try to renew a motion for a temporary
> restraining order and now push this effort. And what really concerns
> me is that the way these papers are pled, they're looking for a list
> of all the mismatches by October 12th, and this is in light of the
> fact that at this point in time we are informed that the Social
> Security Administration will be shutting down its computers for the
> comparisons from the 10th to the 13th for maintenance over the holiday
> weekend. And they want that in time to-the Republican Party wants it
> in time to be able to file challenges twenty days before the election,
> to require ID, which is already required in Ohio, and also to push
> people into provisional voting.
>
>     Juan Gonzalez: Well, I'd like to ask you, you've been now
> Secretary of State-you replaced the infamous and controversial Kenneth
> Blackwell. And in the first year, you had a report called "EVEREST"
> that looked at the situation in the voting system of Ohio. Could you
> tell us about some of the main concerns that you had out of that
> report?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: We focused on four areas. We focused on
> security; reliability of the equipment and the systems; the
> configuration, whether all of the systems throughout the state were
> configured to the same software level; and also whether or not
> procedures that local officials used were mitigating some of the
> concerns that we found.
>
>     Unfortunately, all of the equipment failed-I hate to say the word
> "miserably," but it was a very big disappointment when we compared the
> equipment, which is essentially computer-based equipment, to general
> standards for security in the computer industry, computers that we
> would use for banking, for travel, for communication. The type of
> security that would be required was just not engineered in this
> equipment. Not to say that it can't count correctly, but there were so
> many risks presented that we took this to the legislature, asked the
> legislature to fund us for all-paper ballot systems throughout the
> state. But unfortunately, I think in part due to budget problems in
> Ohio, but also due to the partisan nature of how that body is
> operating, they were silent on providing us with any relief.
>
>     So, what we did instead was to move forward with a bipartisan team
> of election officials, devise best practices for security during every
> step of the voting process, and then we have required security plans
> from every board of elections. So we're making the best of it. In the
> process, we discovered that the Diebold system, as memory cards from
> the individual voting machines were being uploaded into the server in
> one county, votes were dropping. So we are in the middle of litigation
> against Diebold for that.
>
>     Amy Goodman: We're talking to the Secretary of State of the swing
> state of Ohio, Jennifer Brunner. More than 666,000 new voters have
> been added to the voter rolls. How are you going to deal with the
> numbers? The famous pictures of the past, with people waiting hour
> after hour in the pouring rain-of course, that's going to lead to
> people leaving the polling place before they vote. You're going to-how
> are you dealing with close to 700,000 new voters?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: What we did was to look at what happened in Ohio
> in 2004. In counties like Franklin County and Columbus and where
> Kenyan College is, in Knox County, there was an inadequate number of
> voting machines to serve those voters. So we have given the boards of
> elections guidelines for what they need for the adequate distribution
> of voting machines, but-and we've also said to the boards, you need to
> actually publish to the public by the middle of October how many
> voting machines you will have per precinct, and if you're not meeting
> the guidelines, explain why.
>
>     But we're not leaving it there. We have fifty-three of our eighty-
> eight counties who use the touch-screen machines, which we understand,
> aside from security issues, poses a straight supply-and-demand
> concern. So we have backup paper ballots in the amount of 25 percent
> of the number of people who voted in those precincts in the last
> presidential election. And those boards of elections using the DREs
> also have to provide to us a way that voters can move in two lines,
> rather than one, to sign into their poll books and opt for a paper
> ballot if they prefer not to vote on the electronic voting machine. We
> think that's going to alleviate the congestion.
>
>     And in addition, this is the first time Ohio had had absentee
> voting for anyone who prefers to do that without any reason at all. So
> we're seeing record numbers of people voting early, and a conservative
> estimate is that 25 percent of Ohio's registered voters, or the number
> of voters voting, will have voted before Election Day.
>
>     Juan Gonzalez: The New York Post today has a front-page article
> that touches in part on situations going on in Ohio, claiming that the
> group ACORN has been involved in fraudulent voter registration at
> apparently massive levels, according to some of their reports. What is
> your concern about these allegations of fraud in voter registration
> and people voting more than once?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: We have things built into our law so that
> anytime someone registers, even if they register and vote on the same
> day, a notification card is sent to them at their address. If that
> card comes back, that certainly puts that registration into question.
> The poll book is marked, and if that person were to show up at the
> polling place, Ohio law now requires that Ohioans show ID, although
> our ID law is much more liberal than, for instance, Indiana's.
>
>     So-and then also our boards of elections do enter those voter
> registration applications into a database that automatically is sent
> to the Secretary of State's database. We're connected with T1 lines.
> We run that, of course, through the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, who
> sends it on to the Social Security Administration if it can't get a
> match on driver's license.
>
>     So, we think there are some excellent safeguards built into the
> law, but our own experience with ACORN in Ohio is there have been some
> problems in the past, but the person who we work with, when there are
> questions from ACORN is Katy Gall, who is a very experienced and
> conscientious, and we've had nothing but good experiences working with
> her.
>
>     Amy Goodman: Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, what is Ohio's
> laws on people who've served time in prison? This is confusing all
> over the country. Many who have come out of prison do not know that
> they actually can vote in most states. I mean, in places like Vermont,
> you can actually vote from prison. But what are Ohio's laws here?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: In Ohio, it's very simple. If a person has been
> convicted of a felony, as long as they are not incarcerated on that
> felony, they can register and vote. Now, for instance, if they're
> convicted of, say, possession of cocaine, a fifth-degree felony, and
> they're placed on probation, they can certainly be registered and
> vote. If, for instance, they violate their probation and they're
> incarcerated on that probation violation, they would not be able to
> vote during that period of time. But that is-and interestingly enough,
> if someone is in jail on a misdemeanor, they can vote from jail, or if
> they're in jail awaiting trial on new charges and not convicted of
> something, they can vote from jail.
>
>     Juan Gonzalez: One of the things that all of us remember from the
> 2004 elections were these long lines in some polling places in Ohio
> versus no lines in others. Now, we understand that each county
> basically controls its own election apparatus, but what have you been
> able to do to assure an equitable distribution of voting machines so
> that every person in Ohio has basically the same access to exercise
> their right to vote?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: Well, for the first time, we've issued a
> directive that tells the boards of elections, here are the factors
> that you need to consider when allocating your voting machines, things
> like past turnout, new registrations, any recent purges under the
> NVRA, the National Voter Registration Act, in addition to how many
> ballot issues you have on the ballot, because it takes longer for
> people to vote ballot issues. And we've said you've got to have a
> minimum of one machine per 175 voters, when we're talking about the
> touch-screen machines, and if you are not meeting those guidelines,
> you have to explain to us why. But then, as we said before, the safety
> net there is the backup paper ballots, which can be used if machines
> malfunction, if a voter simply prefers a backup paper ballot, or if
> the lines get to be too long.
>
>     Amy Goodman: It is highly unusual, what happened in Ohio. You can
> register and vote on the same day. When was that period? When did it
> just end? How many people voted? And again, the numbers you have now,
> quite amazing, after registration just finished on Monday: 8,184,138,
> the highest number of registered voters ever in the state. What
> happened? And do you see this as a model, of registering and voting on
> the same day, something Republicans fought?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: The period of registration where you could still-
> where you could register and vote on the same day began on September
> 30th, and it ended Monday, October the 6th. We requested information
> from all the counties on those voting figures, which we should be
> getting back today.
>
>     I can tell you, for instance, in Cuyahoga County, just the number
> of people who showed up to vote early, whether or not they registered
> in that week period of time, was 8,000. In one day, the Cuyahoga
> County Board of Elections handled 2,500 voters at the Board of
> Elections. I was at the board yesterday in Cuyahoga. It's an amazing
> operation. They have about, I believe, forty-five stations, where
> people can check in, have their registration checked, get a ballot,
> and it's-they have two different floors people can vote on and 400
> parking places. It's a fantastic operation.
>
>     Second part of your question, Amy, I'm sorry, I lost that one.
>
>     Amy Goodman: The second part is, nationally, being a model, the
> idea of voting and registering on the same day?
>
>     Jennifer Brunner: This is not something new. States like Minnesota
> and North Dakota already do-and I believe Montana-already do this for
> all of their voters. And interestingly enough, in Minnesota, there's
> no need for a provisional ballot.
>
>     The fears that were being expressed and pushed to the national
> media by the Ohio Republican Party really are unfounded. When you look
> at what happened in a period-a four-year period in Ohio, in terms of
> actual voter fraud, we had four individual cases with nearly eight
> million registered voters in a four-year period, and one was a husband
> and wife. As I said before, we've got the notices that go out when a
> person registers.
>
>     So, I think, you see, what's happened here is that the Republican
> Party wants to push out that somehow the Secretary of State made this
> up. Unfortunately for them, the Republicans have held the Ohio Senate
> for twenty-four years and the Ohio House for fourteen years. And
> apparently, when they adopted in 2005 this no-fault absentee voting,
> they just didn't figure out what the consequences were.
>
>     I look for, in the lame-duck session, the Republicans, who will
> still be in control, to move to eliminate this five-day window. But,
> you see, if you look at Ohio law-and there is such thing as a
> provisional ballot for absentee voting-Ohio law does not kick that
> provisional voting in for absentee until the twenty-eighth day before
> the election. And when you think about this five- to seven-day period,
> you have the voter there, the voter is registered, the voter has
> provided ID, and the voter has their ballot. You have everything that
> you need from this voter. Now, if it would be someone who's going to
> take a risk to their liberty and commit a felony, we're probably going
> to find out about it, because when we send that notice to them and
> they don't respond and it comes back and they don't live where they
> say they live, prosecutors are going to go after them.
>
>     Amy Goodman: Well, Jennifer Brunner, we want to thank you very
> much for being with us, Ohio Secretary of State. We're going to
> continue our voting special after break with a new study by the
> Brennan Center for Justice on voters across the country, voting being
> purged through a process that's shrouded in secrecy.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to