Yes I'd sell off the air and water.

Because then you couldn't pollute it, or overgraze it, etc etc.  because
the owner would sue you.  Anyone who is going to quote someone who doesn't
know what the tragedy of the commons is is t going to get free tutorials
from me.

Go read.

On Tuesday, April 15, 2014, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
wrote:

> In general I'd sell them all off
> ---
> Sell a country!? Why not sell the air, the great sea, as well as the
> earth? Didn't the Great Spirit make them all for the use of his children?"
> - Tecumseh
>
> I'll give you 10 to 1 odds that at least some of the the money from the
> sell would end up in the pockets of politicians.
>
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 7:14:48 PM UTC-5, Bruce Majors wrote:
>>
>> In this case it seems it may have already been in use by the families the
>> government is trying to rent it to, before th government claimed to own it.
>>
>> In general I'd sell them all off, including to things like the Audobon
>> society or the nature conservancy
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Plain Ol' asks a valid question Bruce....What would you do with the
>> federal lands currently owned and controlled by the government?  What about
>> properties like the recent sell off of postal properties that went for a
>> fraction of what the realty was worth?
>>
>> There are a number of scenarios where "federal lands"  are owned and
>> controlled by the government, but in this situation out in Nevada,  what
>> would you specifically do with that land?  Sell it off to the public via
>> auction?   What am I missing here?​
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Bruce Majors <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> I don't believe in the current system of allowing politically connected
>> people to exploit federal land
>>
>> Because I don't believe in federal land
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Your question is nonsensical
>> ---
>> yet you say, 'Politically connected people constantly exploit federally
>> controlled land, and that is no doubt what is behind this case as well?
>> hardly nonsense.
>>
>> Harry Reid lives across the street from me in an apartment he paid
>> $850,000 for and no one in his family has ever made any money outside of
>> land deals based on controlling re-zoning
>> ---
>> and Harry is a socialist!!!
>>
>> There should be no federal land
>> ---
>> opinion noted ... not shared.
>> who would you give it to? Corporations, Illegals, foreigners, or the
>> homeless?
>>
>> no .. that land belongs to the federal government to improve for the
>> benefit of Americans.
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:17:17 PM UTC-5, Bruce Majors wrote:
>>
>> Your question is nonsensical
>>
>> Politically connected people constantly exploit federally controlled
>> land, and that is no doubt what is behind this case as well
>>
>> Harry Reid lives across the street from me in an apartment he paid
>> $850,000 for and no one in his family has ever made any money outside of
>> land deals based on controlling re-zoning
>>
>> There should be no federal land
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Federal land should be homesteader
>> ---
>> opinion noted ... not shared.
>>
>> do you really want people exploiting resources on federal land?
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 4:37:54 PM UTC-5, Bruce Majors wrote:
>>
>> Federal land should be homesteader
>>
>> In this case by the original owner who the government took it from
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> This is a major victory over the goliath known as the federal government.
>> ---
>> a minor victory that will be short lived.
>> he should be forced to pay back grazing fees or prohibited from using
>> public land.
>>
>> On Monday, April 14, 2014 2:44:26 PM UTC-5, Bruce Majors wrote:
>>
>>
>> Subject: Cliven Bundy & Our Fight for Freedom
>> To: Bruce Majors <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>     --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to 
> [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','politicalforum%[email protected]');>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to