Bill should prohibit any Muslim from training at US flight schools


Not necessary if Obama were not trying to import as many muslim terrorists
into the US as possible.



B



http://www.hstoday.us/single-article/house-committee-approves-bill-to-keep-libyans-from-training-at-us-flight-schools/4128e1dd32228088cfbac89997cd5a6d.html



House Committee Approves Bill to Keep Libyans from Training at US Flight
Schools

By: Amanda Vicinanzo, Contributing Editor

09/16/2014 (11:52am)





A bill to stop the Obama administration from lifting a 30-year prohibition
on Libyans coming to the United States to attend flight school, work in
aviation maintenance or flight operations or to study or seek training in
nuclear science was approved by the House Committee on the Judiciary.



Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC),
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va), and Oversight and
Government Reform National Security Subcommittee Chairman Jason Chaffetz
(R-Utah) introduced the Protecting the Homeland Act
<http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-113hr5401ih/pdf/BILLS-113hr5401ih.pdf>
(HR 5410) after the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in July approved
a final regulation to lift the longstanding ban
<http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201404&RIN=1653-AA69>
despite the ongoing turmoil in Libya.



“Lifting this longstanding ban is not in the best interest of the American
people and needlessly places our country at risk,” Goodlatte said. “I am
pleased that the House Judiciary Committee approved the Protecting the
Homeland Act to stop President Obama from implementing this foolish and
dangerous plan so that we protect Americans and our national security from
threats in Libya.”



The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in consultation with the
Department of Defense and Department of State, decided to rescind the
restrictions that deny nonimmigrant status and benefits to any Libyan
national or other foreign national acting on behalf of a Libyan entity who
is engaging in aviation maintenance, flight operations or nuclear-related
studies or training because “most of the restrictions and sanctions imposed
by the United States and the United Nations toward Libya have been lifted.”



The ban first emerged in 1983 amidst strained tension between the US and
Libya after Muammar Qaddafi came to power and Libya became a hotbed for
terrorist activity and training. Later in the decade, Libyans spearheaded
the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland and were involved
in the bombing of a French airliner.



Although the Obama administration claims the relationship between the US
and Libya has since “normalized,” rendering the prohibition irrelevant, the
decision to lift the ban emerges just two years after the tragic terrorist
attacks in the Libyan city of Benghazi that left four Americans dead.



“The United States Government and the Government of Libya have normalized
their relationship and most of the restrictions and sanctions imposed by
the United States and the United Nations toward Libya have been lifted,” stated
the final amendment of the ban released by OMB
<http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201404&RIN=1653-AA69>.
“Therefore, DHS, after consultation with the Department of State and the
Department of Defense, is considering rescinding the restrictions that deny
nonimmigrant status and benefits to a specific group of Libyan nationals.”



In addition to the terrorist attack on the US consulate in Benghazi two
years ago, this summer American personnel working at the US embassy in
Libya were evacuated due to heavy militia violence in the capitol, Tripoli.
A UN envoy recently warned that deepening political division and rapidly
deteriorating security have brought Libya “closer to the brink of
protracted conflict and political strife.”



“The Obama administration continues to turn a blind eye to the current
situation in Libya, Chaffetz said. “The country is far from normal and
remains vulnerable to unchecked terrorist activity. Lifting a decades-old
security ban on a country challenged by instability threatens the safety of
both countries. The Protecting the Homeland Act will stop the
Administration from carelessly lifting this ban. I encourage my colleagues
in the House and Senate to swiftly pass this legislation.”



The Air Line Pilots Association International (ALPA), which represents more
than 51,000 pilots who fly for 31 airlines in the US and Canada, sent a
letter to Goodlatte in which the group strongly opposed the lifting of the
prohibition and expressing concern regarding the dangerous conditions in
Libya
<http://judiciary.house.gov/_cache/files/b1429197-d538-4157-be0c-92005ce9c030/letter-to-house-judiciary---libyan-pilot-training.pdf>.




In the letter, Captain Lee Moak, a former president of ALPA, emphasized
that Libya continues to be a very dangerous region. He noted that the
Federal Aviation Administration currently prohibits US airlines and
commercial operators from entering Libyan airspace. Given the current
political instability in Libya and the transitory nature of the Libyan
government, Moak urged the committee to support HR 5401, stating, “safety
and security concerns must never be set aside as a means to build
diplomatic ties.”



As *Homeland Security Today* reported earlier this year
<http://www.hstoday.us/briefings/daily-news-analysis/single-article/lawmakers-demand-dhs-come-clean-on-libyan-immigration-policy-reversal/0d35862409c07089f94161484b9a444e.html>,
the four lawmakers sent a letter to DHS in November 13, 2013, as well as a
follow-up letter, raising concerns about the administration’s proposed
policy, but “to date DHS has failed to respond and has moved forward with
this proposed policy without disclosing information about it to Congress.”



“Since November 25, 2013, House Judiciary Committee staff has contacted DHS
over half a dozen times to determine the status of our inquiry,” and,
“According to [a DHS memo], you expect ‘the Department to respond to
Congress in a direct, courteous and timely manner’ … Yet the letter we sent
to DHS remains unanswered,” the lawmakers said in the letter to the DHS
secretary.



In the absence of further action, the regulation lifting the ban will take
effect once signed by Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson.



“The chief responsibility of government is the security of its people, and
as those entrusted to govern, we must be vigilant in fulfilling this duty,”
Gowdy said. “Yet, the administration has not been clear as to why repealing
this longstanding rule now, while the situation in Libya is more uncertain
and dangerous, will benefit our national security. I am pleased the
committee passed our bill, the Protecting the Homeland Act, to stop this
policy reversal.”




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZ3UxZmMyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTA5NzUwMTU->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaGYxYm9jBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMDk3NTAxNQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to