I don't support sanctuary cities or religious groups who give aid and 
support to illegals.
We know who promotes open borders and why.

On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 9:28:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> I think a better question, is what do we call folks like you, a Secular 
> Progressive who supports  government agents, and a government that promotes 
> this illicit activiyty, and allows for these Sancturay Cities?
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:58 PM, plainolamerican <plainol...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> cities that violate our immigration laws by shielding illegal aliens from 
>> detection are referred to as “sanctuary cities.”
>> ---
>> what should christian and jewish charity organizations that give aid and 
>> support and profit from ME refugees be called?
>>
>> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 3:00:47 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264416/election-2016-threat-immigration-anarchy-hangs-michael-cutler
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *Election 2016: The Threat of Immigration Anarchy Hangs in the Balance*
>>>
>>> Opening the doors to terror. 
>>>
>>> October 11, 2016 
>>>
>>> *Michael Cutler* <http://www.frontpagemag.com/author/michael-cutler> 
>>>
>>> *6* 
>>> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264416/election-2016-threat-immigration-anarchy-hangs-michael-cutler#disqus_thread>
>>>  
>>>
>>> AddThis Sharing Buttons
>>>
>>> Share to Facebook*76*Share to TwitterShare to More*84*Share to Print
>>>
>>> [image: Description: 
>>> http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2016/10/mexico-train.jpg?itok=sKqyvUf2]
>>>
>>> Election Day is rapidly approaching. In considering what is at stake, it 
>>> is important to understand that, as I recently noted, “*The Three Most 
>>> Important Issues For 2016: Immigration, Immigration, Immigration* 
>>> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263869/three-most-important-issues-2016-immigration-michael-cutler>
>>> .”
>>>
>>> Most polls skew how the concerns of the majority of Americans are 
>>> reported by the media. Most Americans are most concerned about the threats 
>>> posed by terrorists and criminals.  All too many Americans fear losing 
>>> their jobs and are concerned about the opportunities that their children 
>>> will have in these United States. Generally, when polls and surveys are 
>>> conducted, participants cannot pick more than one item that they consider 
>>> to be the most important issue. When those polled need to decide what is 
>>> their biggest worry, they tend to ignore the fact that failures of the 
>>> immigration system profoundly undermine national security and have a huge 
>>> impact on nearly every other issue of great concern.
>>>
>>> In the Orwellian world of politics and journalism, cities that violate 
>>> our immigration laws by shielding illegal aliens from detection are 
>>> referred to as “sanctuary cities.” I addressed the threat that such 
>>> jurisdictions create in my article, “*Terrorism, Enclaves and Sanctuary 
>>> Cities* 
>>> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262320/terrorism-enclaves-and-sanctuary-cities-michael-cutler>:
>>>  
>>> *How sanctuary cities facilitate the growth of terror enclaves in 
>>> America*.”
>>>
>>> In point of fact, on October 3, 2016 the New York Times ran an article 
>>> with the breathless title, “*Millions at Risk of Deportation as 
>>> Justices Refuse to Rehear Case* 
>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/us/politics/supreme-court-immigration-obama.html?emc=edit_th_20161004&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=27504654&_r=0>
>>> .”
>>>
>>> The “millions at risk” are aliens who either entered the United States 
>>> without inspection. In the parlance of immigration enforcement personnel, 
>>> such aliens are referred to as Entrants Without Inspection (EWI).  They 
>>> were not vetted and their presence in the United States is a violation of 
>>> our laws that are supposed to prevent the entry of aliens who pose a threat 
>>> to the safety and/or well-being of Americans.
>>>
>>> Such “at risk” aliens also include those who, subsequent to being 
>>> admitted into the United States, went on to violate the terms of their 
>>> admission by remaining in the United States beyond their authorized period 
>>> of admission if they were admitted as non-immigrant (temporary) visitors.  
>>> Foreign students who fail to attend school or fail to maintain proper 
>>> grades are subject to removal.  Aliens who take jobs for which they lack 
>>> authority are subject to removal, as are aliens who are admitted under the 
>>> provisions of temporary work visas and fail to report for those jobs or 
>>> leave those authorized jobs, but remain in the United States without 
>>> permission.
>>>
>>> Finally, aliens who commit a variety of serious crimes may be subject to 
>>> removal even if they were admitted as lawful immigrants.
>>>
>>> Would the New York Times run a report about efforts to get more drunk 
>>> drivers off the road by saying that stepped-up police efforts to identify 
>>> and arrest drunk drivers put those drunk drivers “at risk” of arrest? It is 
>>> more likely they would accurately report that such enforcement programs 
>>> were aimed at making our roads safer.
>>>
>>> Aliens who work illegally, it must be noted, are likely displacing 
>>> American and/or lawful immigrant workers. In this faltering economy where 
>>> so many Americans are unemployed and under-employed, a job is a valuable 
>>> commodity.  Somehow the nonsense spewed by the media makes it appear that 
>>> there is nothing wrong with aliens who are present in the United States 
>>> provided that they are working, even if they have stolen the jobs of 
>>> hard-working Americans.
>>>
>>> Additionally, every year hundreds of billions of dollars are wired or 
>>> otherwise sent from the United States to the home countries of aliens 
>>> working legally and illegally in the United States, hobbling our economy 
>>> and driving up our national debt.
>>>
>>> Our immigration laws are not about bias, but about protection 
>>> -- protection for America and Americans.
>>>
>>> Claiming that Obama sought to “protect” illegal aliens through his 
>>> executive orders and misuse of “prosecutorial discretion” is as Orwellian 
>>> as it gets.  The same could be said of “sanctuary cities.”
>>>
>>> If our government ought to be protecting anyone, it should be the 
>>> citizens of the United States. Our government should be seeking to protect 
>>> victims of crimes committed by aliens who have no right to be present in 
>>> the United States and American workers who are displaced by foreign workers.
>>>
>>> It is essential to note that often the victims of criminal aliens are 
>>> members of the ethnic immigrant communities in which these criminal aliens 
>>> live.
>>>
>>> When illegal aliens evade the inspections process, there is no record of 
>>> their entry.  We don't even know that they are here. This is a matter of 
>>> national security.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, Hillary Clinton would, if elected president, fill the 
>>> current vacancy at the Supreme Court presumably with an appointee who would 
>>> be predisposed to support her proposed massive amnesty program.
>>>
>>> There would be no way to interview those millions of illegal aliens or 
>>> conduct field investigations to verify their identities, entry data and 
>>> other pertinent facts.
>>>
>>> There would be no way to even know if they are actually citizens of the 
>>> countries they will have claimed to be citizens of. There will be no way to 
>>> verify their true identities or when they actually entered the United 
>>> States.  All that the beleaguered adjudications officers of USCIS (United 
>>> States Citizenship and Immigration Services) would have to go by are the 
>>> responses that these aliens provided in their applications.
>>>
>>> It would be relative child's play to defraud this system. It was noted 
>>> by the 9/11 Commission that immigration fraud and visa fraud were the key 
>>> methods by which terrorists enter the United States and embed themselves.
>>>
>>> Having raised the issue of fraud, the Daily Caller ran an article on 
>>> October 3, 2016 showing that the lack of integrity of the immigration 
>>> system apparently mirrors the lack of integrity demonstrated repeatedly by 
>>> Ms. Clinton.  The title of that article was, “*EXCLUSIVE: DHS Refuses 
>>> To Investigate Top Official Who Fast-Tracked Visas For Hillary’s Brother* 
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/03/exclusive-dhs-refuses-to-investigate-top-official-who-fast-tracked-visas-for-hillarys-brother/>
>>> .”
>>>
>>> This hard-hitting news report began with this excerpt:
>>>
>>> *Both the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of Government 
>>> Ethics have refused to fully pursue an ethics investigation against 
>>> Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, and now-Virginia 
>>> Gov. Terry McAuliffe, despite findings that DHS official Alejandro Mayorkas 
>>> gave preferential visa treatment to a company founded by Rodham.*
>>>
>>> *This is likely a breach of federal law.*
>>>
>>> *The DHS’s **inspector general determined* 
>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/US/top-homeland-official-alejandro-mayorkas-accused-political-favoritism/story?id=29868429>*
>>>  
>>> in 2015 that Deputy Secretary Mayorkas, who at the time served as director 
>>> of Citizenship and Immigration Services, had improperly involved himself in 
>>> fast-tracking visa applications under the E-5 investor visa program for 
>>> Rodham and McAullife’s company GreenTech Automotive, which McAullife was 
>>> involved in four years before he became the governor of Virginia in 2013.*
>>>
>>> *Federal regulations state that the director of the Office of 
>>> Governmental Ethics (OGE) **“may recommend” that the head of an agency 
>>> launch an investigation* 
>>> <https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2638.503>* if the OGE director 
>>> “has reason to believe” a violation has taken place. These regulations also 
>>> empower the agency to take “appropriate disciplinary or correction action.”*
>>>
>>> The article concluded this way:
>>>
>>> *In other words, neither agency filed reports on Mayorkas’ major ethics 
>>> violations.*
>>>
>>> *Rodham launched GreenTech Automotive in 2010. The company has in large 
>>> part been financed by EB-5 investors, in addition to receiving millions in 
>>> support from Mississippi and the U.S. government. The EB-5 funding came 
>>> through Gulf Coast Management LLC, which Rodham operated. When Hillary 
>>> Clinton served as secretary of state, Rodham traveled through China 
>>> **funneling 
>>> investment through Gulf Coast* 
>>> <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/hillary-clinton-brother-tony-rodham-terry-mcauliffe-116447>*
>>>  
>>> via the EB-5 program into GreenTech.*
>>>
>>> *Still, the company **has not sold a single electric car* 
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/03/exclusive-mcauliffes-former-green-car-company-hasnt-sold-any-cars-video/>*
>>>  
>>> and has only manufactured 25 vehicles, even though it projected the 
>>> **production 
>>> of 30,000 cars every year since 2014* 
>>> <http://www.desototimes.com/news/car-company-for-real/article_b77e491c-6802-5bda-9964-4ed545c760a2.html>*
>>>  
>>> and after. The type of car GreenTech has produced, called MyCar, can’t go 
>>> any faster than 25 miles an hour because of regulations.*
>>>
>>> *GreenTech is also currently being investigated by the Securities and 
>>> Exchange for securities fraud, **the details of which are unknown* 
>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/greentech-formula-has-made-big-profits-for-mcauliffe/2013/09/21/3c6e332c-2136-11e3-b73c-aab60bf735d0_story.html>
>>> *.*
>>>
>>> *Neither the DHS, nor OGE responded to a request for comment from The 
>>> Daily Caller News Foundation.*
>>>
>>> For all too many of our corrupt politicians, the lack of integrity to 
>>> the immigration system is a cash cow.
>>>
>>> For terrorists, it is something quite different.
>>>
>>> As noted in a Washington Post article written by Bob Woodward, “*In 
>>> Hijacker's Bags, a Call to Planning, Prayer and Death* 
>>> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/18/AR2007111800569.html>,”
>>>  
>>> for terrorists, the failures of the immigration system open the doors to 
>>> terrorists. Take, for instance, these chilling words found in the notebook 
>>> of Mohamed Atta, the ringleader of the terror attacks of 9/11, quoted in 
>>> Woodward's article:
>>>
>>> "Oh, God, open all doors for me. Oh God who answers prayers and answers 
>>> those who ask you, I am asking you for your help. I am asking you for 
>>> forgiveness. I am asking you to lighten my way. I am asking you to lift the 
>>> burden I feel.
>>>
>>> "Oh God, you who open all doors, please open all doors for me, open all 
>>> venues for me, open all avenues for me."
>>>
>>> Metaphorically, America's doors are found at our nation's 325 ports of 
>>> entry.  Most of those terrorists were admitted into the United States 
>>> through those “front doors” and thousands of innocent people were 
>>> slaughtered.
>>>
>>> Those “doors” were also open to the other terrorists who subsequently 
>>> went on bloody, murderous rampages at Boston, San Bernardino and elsewhere.
>>>
>>> Our borders and our immigration laws are our first line of defense and 
>>> our last line of defense.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 
>>>
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
>>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __._,_.___
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <beo...@westerndefense.net> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Visit Your Group 
>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcGdranBtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzYyMjYwNDU->
>>>  
>>>    
>>>    
>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYnVqbTBnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3NjIyNjA0NQ-->
>>>  
>>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> 
>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use 
>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>>>
>>> __,_._,___
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to