*"Just this past weekend, nearly 1,300 rabbis and a number of cantors from
all streams of American Jewry joined together to call on the US Congress to
pass comprehensive immigration reform."*


This is three/four years old.....

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Just this past weekend, nearly 1,300 rabbis and a number of cantors from
> all streams of American Jewry joined together to call on the US Congress to
> pass comprehensive immigration reform.
>
> In a letter sent to the Congress, which they also published on their
> website
> <http://rac.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=23267&pge_prg_id=16390&pge_id=2541>,
> the rabbis said that immigration reform was “in keeping” with the “Jewish
> High Holy Days” demand of “the spirit of self-examination as individuals
> and as a society.”
>
> The letter was signed by leading clergy of the Reform, Conservative,
> Orthodox, and Reconstructionist movements and called for “common sense
> immigration reform” to reflect a “shared commitment to a path to
> citizenship, improved family reunification policies, humane and effective
> border security, sensible worker visa policies, and avenues for refugees
> and asylum seekers.”
>
> The letter went on to say that Jewish history “coupled with the most-often
> repeated Biblical commandment to love the stranger inspires our advocacy
> for immigration reform…”
> [image: Sammie Moshenberg, operations director of the Washington NJWC
> gives Communist salute during sit-in pro-immigration protest in D.C. this
> past week.]
>
> This is not the only such statement by the organized Jewish community in
> America. Just this past week, the director of Washington operations for the
> National Council of Jewish Women, Sammie Moshenberg , was among more than
> 100 activists arrested for a “sit-in” pro-immigration protest at the US
> Capitol building.
> <http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/national-news/jewish-womens-group-head-among-100-arrested-immigration-protest>
>
> The American Jewish Congress (AJC), the single largest Jewish organization
> in America, has a special advocacy group set up to promote “immigration
> reform.”
>
> According to the AJC website devoted specially to promoting nonwhite
> immigration into America
> <http://www.ajc.org/site/c.7oJILSPwFfJSG/b.8467015/k.CC42/Immigration_Reform.htm>,
> that Jewish organization boasts that it “promotes a fair and just
> immigration policy consistent with our position that a strong America is
> vital for global freedom and security.
>
> [image: AJC1]
>
> “National conflict over immigration undermines America’s strength and our
> country’s commitment to democratic and humanitarian values. With our shared
> immigrant experience, the Jewish people understand that upholding the
> rights of immigrants is vital to a strong America,” the AJC says.
>
> An article in the Jewish newspaper, the *Daily Forward,* announced that “Jews
> Unite Behind Push for Immigration Reform
> <http://forward.com/articles/179296/jews-unite-behind-push-for-immigration-reform/?p=all>”
> and significantly added that “Ethics and Self-Interest Drive Unusual
> Nationwide Effort.”
>
> [image: forward012]
>
> The *Daily Forward* article says that those “leading an active push for
> the [immigration reform] bill, which will offer a path to citizenship for
> some of the nation’s 11 million undocumented aliens, include the Hebrew
> Immigrant Aid Society, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation
> League, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Bend the Arc and the
> National Council of Jewish Women.
>
> “The Senate vote—and the even harder struggle that will follow in the
> Republican-controlled House—represents the fulfillment of a sustained
> campaign by the Jewish community for immigration reform, which has built
> momentum over the past decade.
>
> Quoting the president and CEO  of an organization called the Hebrew
> Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS)—which used to promote Jewish immigration, but
> now promotes all nonwhite immigration into America,  Mark Hetfield, the *Daily
> Forward* said Jews promoted immigration because it was in their
> ‘strategic interest.’
>
> “It’s the ethical thing to do,” said HIAS president and CEO, of the
> community’s immigration reform activism. But he quickly added, “It’s in our
> strategic interest.”
>
> However, in Israel—which all of these Jewish organizations and individuals
> quoted above support fanatically—an immigration policy which is the exact
> opposite is rigorously enforced.
>
> Israel’s “Law of Return” immigration policy is actually based upon the
> Nazi Nuremburg race laws, which defined a Jew as anyone with two or more
> Jewish grandparents.
> READ  Artist Reveals Ultimate Truth that Race Is Genetic
>
> <http://newobserveronline.com/artist-reveals-ultimate-truth-that-race-is-genetic/>
>
> This law of return is not based on religion—because Jewish atheists also
> qualify for settlement in Israel. They do not have to be believing Jews to
> come to Israel—all they have to have is biological Jewish ancestry.
>
> In addition, it is illegal for Jews to marry non-Jews in Israel
> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/12/israel-civil-marriage-ban_n_3429764.html>—another
> direct carryover from the Nazi laws concerning race.
>
> [image: jewish-marriage1]
>
> Israel also has a zero tolerance policy for asylum seekers. They have set
> up concentration camps in which thousands of Africans are interred awaiting
> deportation
> <http://972mag.com/photo-essay-a-desert-prison-built-to-hold-thousand-of-refugees/58970/>,
> and most recently, the Jewish state announced that it was deporting all
> Africans to Uganda, no matter which country they originally came from.
> <http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/30/israel-plan-deport-african-migrants-uganda>
> [image: Israeli concentration in southern Israel set up to hold African
> asylum seekers.]
> <http://972mag.com/photo-essay-a-desert-prison-built-to-hold-thousand-of-refugees/58970/>*Israeli
> concentration in southern Israel set up to hold African asylum seekers.*
>
> [image: israel-deports-Africans1]
>
> Finally, Israel has recently announced that it is to start testing
> immigrants for Jewish DNA before allowing them to settle in Israel.
> <http://newobserveronline.com/israel-starts-using-dna-to-check-for-jewishness-of-immigrants/>
>  This
> significant move (because it confirms a biological basis to Judaism) came
> about because of concern in Israel over suspected non-Jews entering Israel
> from the former Soviet Union countries.
>
> [image: TOI-DNA2]
>
> Israel, therefore, has a completely racially-based immigration policy, and
> only allows people of biological Jewish descent to immigrate to that nation.
>
> This policy is directly contradictory to the position taken by Jewish
> groups in America and other European nations—yet these same Jewish
> organizations will defend Israel to the last.
>
> To put this into perspective: If America, or any nation for that matter,
> had to adopt racially based immigration policies and check the DNA of
> potential immigrants before allowing them to settle, these Jewish
> organizations would be up in arms and screaming “Nazi” and “holocaust” from
> the rooftops.
>
> Yet Israel can adopt such policies without anyone raising so much as a
> peep of protest. On the contrary, these same Jewish organizations will
> fanatically support Israel’s “right to be a Jewish state.”
> READ  How Many More Must Die?
> <http://newobserveronline.com/how-many-more-must-die/>
>
> Why do Jews promote nonwhite immigration into European nations while
> simultaneously supporting Israel’s racially based immigration policies?
> This is a topic which cuts to the core of the question, and is addressed in
> the last section of this book.
>
> *This article has been extracted from the forthcoming book *The Fall of
> Jerusalem: Rome, Jews, and the Origins of Jewish Racism* by Arthur Kemp.
>
> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 10:03:57 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Yes we do....Secular Progressives like you, and the Democratic Party.;
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:58 PM, plainolamerican <plainol...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't support sanctuary cities or religious groups who give aid and
>>> support to illegals.
>>> We know who promotes open borders and why.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 9:28:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think a better question, is what do we call folks like you, a Secular
>>>> Progressive who supports  government agents, and a government that promotes
>>>> this illicit activiyty, and allows for these Sancturay Cities?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:58 PM, plainolamerican <plainol...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> cities that violate our immigration laws by shielding illegal aliens
>>>>> from detection are referred to as “sanctuary cities.”
>>>>> ---
>>>>> what should christian and jewish charity organizations that give aid
>>>>> and support and profit from ME refugees be called?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 3:00:47 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264416/election-2016-threat-
>>>>>> immigration-anarchy-hangs-michael-cutler
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Election 2016: The Threat of Immigration Anarchy Hangs in the
>>>>>> Balance*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Opening the doors to terror.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> October 11, 2016
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Michael Cutler* <http://www.frontpagemag.com/author/michael-cutler>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *6*
>>>>>> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264416/election-2016-threat-immigration-anarchy-hangs-michael-cutler#disqus_thread>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AddThis Sharing Buttons
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Share to Facebook*76*Share to TwitterShare to More*84*Share to Print
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Description:
>>>>>> http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2016/10/mexico-train.jpg?itok=sKqyvUf2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Election Day is rapidly approaching. In considering what is at stake,
>>>>>> it is important to understand that, as I recently noted, “*The Three
>>>>>> Most Important Issues For 2016: Immigration, Immigration, Immigration*
>>>>>> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263869/three-most-important-issues-2016-immigration-michael-cutler>
>>>>>> .”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most polls skew how the concerns of the majority of Americans are
>>>>>> reported by the media. Most Americans are most concerned about the 
>>>>>> threats
>>>>>> posed by terrorists and criminals.  All too many Americans fear losing
>>>>>> their jobs and are concerned about the opportunities that their children
>>>>>> will have in these United States. Generally, when polls and surveys are
>>>>>> conducted, participants cannot pick more than one item that they consider
>>>>>> to be the most important issue. When those polled need to decide what is
>>>>>> their biggest worry, they tend to ignore the fact that failures of the
>>>>>> immigration system profoundly undermine national security and have a huge
>>>>>> impact on nearly every other issue of great concern.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the Orwellian world of politics and journalism, cities that
>>>>>> violate our immigration laws by shielding illegal aliens from detection 
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> referred to as “sanctuary cities.” I addressed the threat that such
>>>>>> jurisdictions create in my article, “*Terrorism, Enclaves and
>>>>>> Sanctuary Cities*
>>>>>> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262320/terrorism-enclaves-and-sanctuary-cities-michael-cutler>:
>>>>>> *How sanctuary cities facilitate the growth of terror enclaves in
>>>>>> America*.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In point of fact, on October 3, 2016 the New York Times ran an
>>>>>> article with the breathless title, “*Millions at Risk of Deportation
>>>>>> as Justices Refuse to Rehear Case*
>>>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/us/politics/supreme-court-immigration-obama.html?emc=edit_th_20161004&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=27504654&_r=0>
>>>>>> .”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The “millions at risk” are aliens who either entered the United
>>>>>> States without inspection. In the parlance of immigration enforcement
>>>>>> personnel, such aliens are referred to as Entrants Without Inspection
>>>>>> (EWI).  They were not vetted and their presence in the United States is a
>>>>>> violation of our laws that are supposed to prevent the entry of aliens 
>>>>>> who
>>>>>> pose a threat to the safety and/or well-being of Americans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Such “at risk” aliens also include those who, subsequent to being
>>>>>> admitted into the United States, went on to violate the terms of their
>>>>>> admission by remaining in the United States beyond their authorized 
>>>>>> period
>>>>>> of admission if they were admitted as non-immigrant (temporary) visitors.
>>>>>> Foreign students who fail to attend school or fail to maintain proper
>>>>>> grades are subject to removal.  Aliens who take jobs for which they lack
>>>>>> authority are subject to removal, as are aliens who are admitted under 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> provisions of temporary work visas and fail to report for those jobs or
>>>>>> leave those authorized jobs, but remain in the United States without
>>>>>> permission.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, aliens who commit a variety of serious crimes may be subject
>>>>>> to removal even if they were admitted as lawful immigrants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would the New York Times run a report about efforts to get more drunk
>>>>>> drivers off the road by saying that stepped-up police efforts to identify
>>>>>> and arrest drunk drivers put those drunk drivers “at risk” of arrest? It 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> more likely they would accurately report that such enforcement programs
>>>>>> were aimed at making our roads safer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aliens who work illegally, it must be noted, are likely displacing
>>>>>> American and/or lawful immigrant workers. In this faltering economy where
>>>>>> so many Americans are unemployed and under-employed, a job is a valuable
>>>>>> commodity.  Somehow the nonsense spewed by the media makes it appear that
>>>>>> there is nothing wrong with aliens who are present in the United States
>>>>>> provided that they are working, even if they have stolen the jobs of
>>>>>> hard-working Americans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Additionally, every year hundreds of billions of dollars are wired or
>>>>>> otherwise sent from the United States to the home countries of aliens
>>>>>> working legally and illegally in the United States, hobbling our economy
>>>>>> and driving up our national debt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our immigration laws are not about bias, but about protection
>>>>>> -- protection for America and Americans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Claiming that Obama sought to “protect” illegal aliens through his
>>>>>> executive orders and misuse of “prosecutorial discretion” is as Orwellian
>>>>>> as it gets.  The same could be said of “sanctuary cities.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If our government ought to be protecting anyone, it should be the
>>>>>> citizens of the United States. Our government should be seeking to 
>>>>>> protect
>>>>>> victims of crimes committed by aliens who have no right to be present in
>>>>>> the United States and American workers who are displaced by foreign 
>>>>>> workers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is essential to note that often the victims of criminal aliens are
>>>>>> members of the ethnic immigrant communities in which these criminal 
>>>>>> aliens
>>>>>> live.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When illegal aliens evade the inspections process, there is no record
>>>>>> of their entry.  We don't even know that they are here. This is a matter 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> national security.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless, Hillary Clinton would, if elected president, fill the
>>>>>> current vacancy at the Supreme Court presumably with an appointee who 
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> be predisposed to support her proposed massive amnesty program.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There would be no way to interview those millions of illegal aliens
>>>>>> or conduct field investigations to verify their identities, entry data 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> other pertinent facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There would be no way to even know if they are actually citizens of
>>>>>> the countries they will have claimed to be citizens of. There will be no
>>>>>> way to verify their true identities or when they actually entered the
>>>>>> United States.  All that the beleaguered adjudications officers of USCIS
>>>>>> (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) would have to go by
>>>>>> are the responses that these aliens provided in their applications.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be relative child's play to defraud this system. It was
>>>>>> noted by the 9/11 Commission that immigration fraud and visa fraud were 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> key methods by which terrorists enter the United States and embed
>>>>>> themselves.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Having raised the issue of fraud, the Daily Caller ran an article on
>>>>>> October 3, 2016 showing that the lack of integrity of the immigration
>>>>>> system apparently mirrors the lack of integrity demonstrated repeatedly 
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> Ms. Clinton.  The title of that article was, “*EXCLUSIVE: DHS
>>>>>> Refuses To Investigate Top Official Who Fast-Tracked Visas For Hillary’s
>>>>>> Brother*
>>>>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/03/exclusive-dhs-refuses-to-investigate-top-official-who-fast-tracked-visas-for-hillarys-brother/>
>>>>>> .”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This hard-hitting news report began with this excerpt:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Both the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of
>>>>>> Government Ethics have refused to fully pursue an ethics investigation
>>>>>> against Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, and
>>>>>> now-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, despite findings that DHS official
>>>>>> Alejandro Mayorkas gave preferential visa treatment to a company founded 
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> Rodham.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *This is likely a breach of federal law.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *The DHS’s **inspector general determined*
>>>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/US/top-homeland-official-alejandro-mayorkas-accused-political-favoritism/story?id=29868429>*
>>>>>> in 2015 that Deputy Secretary Mayorkas, who at the time served as 
>>>>>> director
>>>>>> of Citizenship and Immigration Services, had improperly involved himself 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> fast-tracking visa applications under the E-5 investor visa program for
>>>>>> Rodham and McAullife’s company GreenTech Automotive, which McAullife was
>>>>>> involved in four years before he became the governor of Virginia in 
>>>>>> 2013.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Federal regulations state that the director of the Office of
>>>>>> Governmental Ethics (OGE) **“may recommend” that the head of an
>>>>>> agency launch an investigation*
>>>>>> <https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2638.503>* if the OGE
>>>>>> director “has reason to believe” a violation has taken place. These
>>>>>> regulations also empower the agency to take “appropriate disciplinary or
>>>>>> correction action.”*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The article concluded this way:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *In other words, neither agency filed reports on Mayorkas’ major
>>>>>> ethics violations.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Rodham launched GreenTech Automotive in 2010. The company has in
>>>>>> large part been financed by EB-5 investors, in addition to receiving
>>>>>> millions in support from Mississippi and the U.S. government. The EB-5
>>>>>> funding came through Gulf Coast Management LLC, which Rodham operated. 
>>>>>> When
>>>>>> Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, Rodham traveled through 
>>>>>> China
>>>>>> **funneling investment through Gulf Coast*
>>>>>> <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/hillary-clinton-brother-tony-rodham-terry-mcauliffe-116447>*
>>>>>> via the EB-5 program into GreenTech.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Still, the company **has not sold a single electric car*
>>>>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/03/exclusive-mcauliffes-former-green-car-company-hasnt-sold-any-cars-video/>*
>>>>>> and has only manufactured 25 vehicles, even though it projected the 
>>>>>> **production
>>>>>> of 30,000 cars every year since 2014*
>>>>>> <http://www.desototimes.com/news/car-company-for-real/article_b77e491c-6802-5bda-9964-4ed545c760a2.html>*
>>>>>> and after. The type of car GreenTech has produced, called MyCar, can’t go
>>>>>> any faster than 25 miles an hour because of regulations.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *GreenTech is also currently being investigated by the Securities and
>>>>>> Exchange for securities fraud, **the details of which are unknown*
>>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/greentech-formula-has-made-big-profits-for-mcauliffe/2013/09/21/3c6e332c-2136-11e3-b73c-aab60bf735d0_story.html>
>>>>>> *.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Neither the DHS, nor OGE responded to a request for comment from The
>>>>>> Daily Caller News Foundation.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For all too many of our corrupt politicians, the lack of integrity to
>>>>>> the immigration system is a cash cow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For terrorists, it is something quite different.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As noted in a Washington Post article written by Bob Woodward, “*In
>>>>>> Hijacker's Bags, a Call to Planning, Prayer and Death*
>>>>>> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/18/AR2007111800569.html>,”
>>>>>> for terrorists, the failures of the immigration system open the doors to
>>>>>> terrorists. Take, for instance, these chilling words found in the 
>>>>>> notebook
>>>>>> of Mohamed Atta, the ringleader of the terror attacks of 9/11, quoted in
>>>>>> Woodward's article:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Oh, God, open all doors for me. Oh God who answers prayers and
>>>>>> answers those who ask you, I am asking you for your help. I am asking you
>>>>>> for forgiveness. I am asking you to lighten my way. I am asking you to 
>>>>>> lift
>>>>>> the burden I feel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Oh God, you who open all doors, please open all doors for me, open
>>>>>> all venues for me, open all avenues for me."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Metaphorically, America's doors are found at our nation's 325 ports
>>>>>> of entry.  Most of those terrorists were admitted into the United States
>>>>>> through those “front doors” and thousands of innocent people were
>>>>>> slaughtered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those “doors” were also open to the other terrorists who subsequently
>>>>>> went on bloody, murderous rampages at Boston, San Bernardino and 
>>>>>> elsewhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our borders and our immigration laws are our first line of defense
>>>>>> and our last line of defense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __._,_.___
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <beo...@westerndefense.net>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Visit Your Group
>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcGdranBtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzYyMjYwNDU->
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups]
>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYnVqbTBnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3NjIyNjA0NQ-->
>>>>>> • Privacy
>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
>>>>>> Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __,_._,___
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to