ridding our nation of zionist warmongers like you is absolutely necessary.
you should leave for israel while you're still able, ziopunk.

On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 11:34:59 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Thank you for showing your true Anti-American colors Sissy-Pus!  
>
> It makes it easier to identify traitors like you.....
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:23 PM, plainolamerican <plainol...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> I am a proud Veteran,
>> ---
>> being proud of killing and destruction is a mental disorder.
>>
>>   and yes, I have stood on the wall to protect folks like you who are 
>> worthless drains and dregs on our society. 
>> ---
>> delusion noted. 
>>
>> You should salute folks like me and be thankful!
>> ---
>> I should piss on your graves and pity your children.
>>
>> On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 11:03:15 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Sissy-Pus!  
>>>
>>> I am a proud Veteran, and yes, I have stood on the wall to protect folks 
>>> like you who are worthless drains and dregs on our society.  
>>>
>>> You should salute folks like me and be thankful!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:54 AM, plainolamerican <plainol...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As a proud Veteran
>>>> ---
>>>> so you're a fucking warmonger.
>>>> those who choose war are the first to die.
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:50:01 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As a proud Veteran, I will compare my acts of Patriotism against yours 
>>>>> any day of the week, Pussy....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:47 AM, plainolamerican <
>>>>> plainol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you justify your Anti-Semitism
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> I don't have anything against semites .. but you do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sem·ite
>>>>>> ˈsemīt/
>>>>>> *noun*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    1. a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic 
>>>>>>    language, including in particular the Jews and Arabs.
>>>>>>    
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ... and you're pos zionist xian and a traitor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:42:31 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Besides not being all that well informed, (you've made clear where 
>>>>>>> you obtain your news and who your sources are);  it's dawned on me the 
>>>>>>> last 
>>>>>>> six or ten months that you're really not all that bright....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do you justify your Anti-Semitism with your obvious support for 
>>>>>>> the likes of George Soros, the Democratic Party; and those who 
>>>>>>> subscribe to 
>>>>>>> the entire Jewish Socialistic/Communistic theorem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's got to be perplexing for you, even though it's abundantly 
>>>>>>> clear that you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer......
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:35 AM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>> plainol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> believe your own lies often?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [image: Image result for US zionist christians]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:15:01 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes.....You do.  Your far left Anti-American rhetoric on a daily 
>>>>>>>>> basis establishes who you support, much less your choice for 
>>>>>>>>> candidates:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Your 2016 Presidential Picks
>>>>>>>>> To: PoliticalForum <politic...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Candidates you side with...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 89%
>>>>>>>>> [image: Hillary Clinton]Hillary Clinton  Democratic
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on economic, domestic policy, healthcare, social, education, and 
>>>>>>>>> environmental issues.
>>>>>>>>> compare answers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1840736686:801556209>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 82%
>>>>>>>>> [image: Bernie Sanders]Bernie Sanders  Democratic
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on environmental, domestic policy, healthcare, social, and 
>>>>>>>>> economic issues.
>>>>>>>>> compare answers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1840736686:801556211>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 61%
>>>>>>>>> [image: John Kasich]John Kasich  Republican
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on environmental and electoral issues.
>>>>>>>>> compare answers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1840736686:585676237>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 56% 
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1840736686:801556201>
>>>>>>>>> [image: Jeb Bush] 
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1840736686:801556201>Jeb
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> Bush  Republican 
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1840736686:801556201>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on healthcare, immigration, and criminal issues.
>>>>>>>>> compare answers 
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1840736686:801556201>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:20 AM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>>> plainol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  the woman who you support for POTUS
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> wrong agian ... I don't vote for democrats or republicans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump courts Republican Jews with offensive stereotypes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WASHINGTON – Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump on 
>>>>>>>>>> Thursday invoked a series of stereotypes about Jews that are often 
>>>>>>>>>> deemed 
>>>>>>>>>> offensive and even anti-Semitic — in an address to Jewish 
>>>>>>>>>> Republicans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> “I’m a negotiator like you folks were negotiators,” the 
>>>>>>>>>> controversial candidate declared to his audience at the Republican 
>>>>>>>>>> Jewish 
>>>>>>>>>> Coalition, as he explained that he would broker a stronger nuclear 
>>>>>>>>>> deal 
>>>>>>>>>> with Iran than the one concluded earlier this year. At another point 
>>>>>>>>>> in his 
>>>>>>>>>> speech, he said: “Is there anyone in this room who doesn’t negotiate 
>>>>>>>>>> deals? 
>>>>>>>>>> Probably more than any room I’ve ever spoken.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> His speech came at the tail end of a morning of addresses in 
>>>>>>>>>> which the other Republican candidates boasted of their pro-Israel 
>>>>>>>>>> credentials and their close ties to the US Jewish community.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Although Trump did reiterate his tight ties with his “friend” 
>>>>>>>>>> Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the audience wasn’t tolerant of 
>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>> mogul’s attempts to duck a question on Jerusalem. Asked about his 
>>>>>>>>>> position 
>>>>>>>>>> on the unification of the Israeli capital, Trump refused to commit – 
>>>>>>>>>> as 
>>>>>>>>>> most Republican candidates have – to declaring the city to be the 
>>>>>>>>>> eternal 
>>>>>>>>>> capital of the Jewish state, and was greeted with boos.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However, the audience did not offer any negative response when 
>>>>>>>>>> Trump told them, “You’re not gonna support me even though you know 
>>>>>>>>>> I’m the 
>>>>>>>>>> best thing that could ever happen to Israel. And I’ll be that.” He 
>>>>>>>>>> continued, evoking a stereotype about Jews, money and control, “And 
>>>>>>>>>> I know 
>>>>>>>>>> why you’re not going to support me. You’re not going to support me 
>>>>>>>>>> because 
>>>>>>>>>> I don’t want your money. Isn’t it crazy?”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> According to AP, he added: “You want to control your own 
>>>>>>>>>> politician.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump backtracked on comments that he made Wednesday in which he 
>>>>>>>>>> suggested that Israelis could sacrifice more than they had already 
>>>>>>>>>> for the 
>>>>>>>>>> sake of peace.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> “It has to be said that Israel has given a lot,” he acknowledged. 
>>>>>>>>>> “I don’t know whether or not they want to go that final step, you 
>>>>>>>>>> know, and 
>>>>>>>>>> that’s going to be up to them. But Israel has not been given the 
>>>>>>>>>> credit 
>>>>>>>>>> that they deserve for what they’ve done, I will say that. I will say 
>>>>>>>>>> that.” 
>>>>>>>>>> At the same time, he added that he didn’t know “if Israel has the 
>>>>>>>>>> commitment to make [a deal with the Palestinians]” or “if the other 
>>>>>>>>>> side 
>>>>>>>>>> has the commitment to make it.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump, who previously questioned whether President Barack Obama 
>>>>>>>>>> was born a US citizen, also reiterated insinuations that the 
>>>>>>>>>> president was 
>>>>>>>>>> hiding something, implying that perhaps he is crypto-Muslim.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> “Radical Islamic terrorism — we have a president who refuses to 
>>>>>>>>>> use the term,” he complained. “There’s something going on with him 
>>>>>>>>>> that we 
>>>>>>>>>> don’t know about.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Earlier Thursday, the head of the Republican Party in Israel said 
>>>>>>>>>> that Trump should not not be the president of the United States. 
>>>>>>>>>> Speaking 
>>>>>>>>>> on Army Radio, Marc Zell said that American voters would be sure to 
>>>>>>>>>> recognize that the candidate did not possess the necessary qualities 
>>>>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>>>>> lead his country.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> “The voters understand that to lead the United States, you need a 
>>>>>>>>>> person who knows more than how to sell products, with all due 
>>>>>>>>>> respect to 
>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump, and everything he has achieved in his career,” Zell 
>>>>>>>>>> said. “In 
>>>>>>>>>> my opinion, he cannot be president of the United States.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 9:16:34 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Plain Ol?  How is it that you can obfuscate and totally ignore 
>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that the woman who you support for POTUS is an Open 
>>>>>>>>>>> Borders/Open 
>>>>>>>>>>> Trade" far left liberal extremist, who has championed increasing 
>>>>>>>>>>> Syrian 
>>>>>>>>>>> Rebels/Refugees by 550%?  
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nevermind.  It's really quite clear when one thinks about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:52 AM, plainolamerican <
>>>>>>>>>>> plainol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Hillary Clinton’s “Open Borders” Dream*
>>>>>>>>>>>> *---*
>>>>>>>>>>>> RELIGIOUS 'CHARITIES' PROFIT FROM OPEN BORDERS
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thousands of Central American children crossing the border 
>>>>>>>>>>>> illegally could soon turn into asylum seekers armed with 
>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration 
>>>>>>>>>>>> lawyers provided by church groups and paid for by federal tax 
>>>>>>>>>>>> dollars.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WND reported Friday 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/church-raising-money-for-illegals/> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Catholic Charities USA and other religious groups were working 
>>>>>>>>>>>> behind the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> scenes with the federal government to temporarily house and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> resettle the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> children in dozens of communities across the United States.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Catholic Charities is running a fundraising campaign to help 
>>>>>>>>>>>> finance the resettlement of the illegal aliens, WND reported. But 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> religious charities get the bulk of their funding not from private 
>>>>>>>>>>>> donors 
>>>>>>>>>>>> or church members putting checks into a basket. They get it from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> federal government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandria, Va.-based Catholic Charities USA reported receiving 
>>>>>>>>>>>> $1.7 million in government grants in 2012, according to its IRS 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Form 990 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://catholiccharitiesusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/CCUSA-2013-990.pdf>
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But one of the largest recipients of government funds to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> resettle immigrant children is the U.S. Conference of Catholic 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bishops. The 
>>>>>>>>>>>> USCCB helps resettle not only unaccompanied alien children, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> UACs, who 
>>>>>>>>>>>> enter the country illegally but also refugees fleeing persecution 
>>>>>>>>>>>> overseas 
>>>>>>>>>>>> who enter through legal channels.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The USCCB is one of nine agencies that receive hundreds of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> millions in tax dollars to resettle refugees and asylum seekers in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the U.S. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> under contract with the federal government. Six of the nine 
>>>>>>>>>>>> contractors are 
>>>>>>>>>>>> religious groups, WND has learned, including the Lutheran 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Immigration and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Refugee Service, Episcopal Migration Ministries, the Hebrew 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant Aid 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Society, the Church World Service and World Relief Corp., which 
>>>>>>>>>>>> includes a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> plethora of evangelical groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Catholic Bishops alone received $65.9 million in federal 
>>>>>>>>>>>> grants to care for unaccompanied alien children and refugees, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> according to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2012 annual report 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.usccb.org/about/migration-and-refugee-services/upload/Annual-Report-2012.pdf>
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By contrast, the group raised $1.4 million from its own church 
>>>>>>>>>>>> members while federal loans and private-sector grants made up the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> remainder 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the $71 million spent on the resettlements that year. That 
>>>>>>>>>>>> means 93 
>>>>>>>>>>>> percent of the USCCB’s spending on charity work with UACs and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> refugees was 
>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the American taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kevin Appleby, director of USCC’s Migration and Refugee 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Services Office, did not respond to calls and emails from WND 
>>>>>>>>>>>> seeking 
>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Similar funding ratios have been found to be the norm with the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lutheran effort.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service reported total 
>>>>>>>>>>>> income of $41.7 million in 2012, and government grants accounted 
>>>>>>>>>>>> for $40.4 
>>>>>>>>>>>> million, or 96.8 percent of that amount, according to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> nonprofit’s most 
>>>>>>>>>>>> recently reported Form 990 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/132/574/2012-132574854-0989f698-9.pdf>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>> a disclosure that nonprofits must file with the Internal Revenue 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Service. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The group raised only $1.3 million from private donors.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Miji Bell, press spokeswoman for Lutheran Immigration, also did 
>>>>>>>>>>>> not return calls Tuesday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The money for refugees and asylum seekers may not even include 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the federal money funneled to Catholic Charities USA and other 
>>>>>>>>>>>> religious 
>>>>>>>>>>>> groups to resettle illegal border crossers coming into Texas, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> New Mexico who arrive by themselves. The charities often 
>>>>>>>>>>>> subcontract with 
>>>>>>>>>>>> other charities, making it difficult to track the money.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The numbers of UACs coming through the Southern border have 
>>>>>>>>>>>> increased dramatically since 2009, and so have the costs, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> according to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Office of Refugee Resettlement, which operates within the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Department of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Health and Human Services.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Eight years ago, the program averaged 6,775 referrals a year. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> In fiscal 2013 the number reached 24,668. Now, the agency is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> expecting 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 60,000 referrals in 2014 at a cost to the U.S. government of more 
>>>>>>>>>>>> than $750 
>>>>>>>>>>>> million, up from less than $500 million in 2013 and less than $250 
>>>>>>>>>>>> million 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2009.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The University of Texas at El Paso’s National Center for Border 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Security and Immigration conducted a study 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://ncbsi.utep.edu/documents/UAC%20Project%20Site%20Visits/UTEP%20NCBSI%20Final%20Report%20March%2020%202014.pdf>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  published 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in March in which it laid bare the major cause of the problem – 
>>>>>>>>>>>> exploitation of weak border enforcement policies by the U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “Both Border Patrol and ICE ERO officers agreed that the lack 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of deterrence for crossing the U.S.-Mexican border has impacted 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the rate at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> which they apprehend UACs. Officers are certain that UACs are 
>>>>>>>>>>>> aware of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> relative lack of consequences they will receive when apprehended 
>>>>>>>>>>>> at the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. border,” the authors wrote on page 3 of the UTEP study. “UTEP 
>>>>>>>>>>>> was 
>>>>>>>>>>>> informed that smugglers of family members of UACs understand that 
>>>>>>>>>>>> once a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> UAC is apprehended for illegal entry into the United States, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> individual 
>>>>>>>>>>>> will be re-united with a U.S. based family member pending the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> disposition 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the immigration hearing. This process appears to be exploited 
>>>>>>>>>>>> by illegal 
>>>>>>>>>>>> alien smugglers and family members in the United States who wish 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to reunite 
>>>>>>>>>>>> with separated children.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How many of the Central American children will seek asylum is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> not clear at this point. The United Nations is considering 
>>>>>>>>>>>> granting some 
>>>>>>>>>>>> type of legal status to children in Guatemala, El Salvador and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Honduras who 
>>>>>>>>>>>> can show evidence of being persecuted. An asylum seeker differs 
>>>>>>>>>>>> from a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> refugee in that the person comes into the U.S. on his own, often 
>>>>>>>>>>>> crossing 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the border illegally, and then seeks to gain asylum through legal 
>>>>>>>>>>>> channels.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Included in President Obama’s $3.7 billion emergency aid 
>>>>>>>>>>>> package for dealing with the border crisis is $1.1 million for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration 
>>>>>>>>>>>> lawyers to represent the illegal alien children. Another $1.8 
>>>>>>>>>>>> billion would 
>>>>>>>>>>>> go toward resettling the children as opposed to deporting them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don Barnett, a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> said he would like to see the feds rein in the grants and loans to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> charities that resettle refugees and UACs seeking asylum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The federal government gives out not only grants but loans, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the nonprofit charities are able to pocket 25 percent of whatever 
>>>>>>>>>>>> they 
>>>>>>>>>>>> collect on those loans, Barnett explained. He said many of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> loans are 
>>>>>>>>>>>> made to refugees or UACs for travel purposes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “They actually hire collection agents to get the money back 
>>>>>>>>>>>> from the refugees,” he said. “It’s very profitable for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> nonprofits, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> really quite profitable, and it has introduced perverse incentives 
>>>>>>>>>>>> into the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> whole process, into decision making and policy,” he said. “It 
>>>>>>>>>>>> totally 
>>>>>>>>>>>> disincentivizes rational thinking.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> These same religious charities can also be found lobbying 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Congress and the Obama administration for amnesty legislation and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> other 
>>>>>>>>>>>> policies that immigration watchdogs see as encouraging more 
>>>>>>>>>>>> illegal 
>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants to cross the border.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On July 2 the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> letter  <http://www.usccb.org/news/2014/14-118.cfm>to Obama 
>>>>>>>>>>>> urging him not to send any of the unaccompanied children who had 
>>>>>>>>>>>> illegally 
>>>>>>>>>>>> crossed into the U.S. back to their home countries.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “Current law permits children from non-contiguous countries to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> remain in the country until their request for asylum or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration relief 
>>>>>>>>>>>> is considered by an immigration judge,” said Eusebio Elizondo, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary 
>>>>>>>>>>>> bishop of Seattle and chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bishops’ 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee on Migration. “This is a very vulnerable population 
>>>>>>>>>>>> which has 
>>>>>>>>>>>> been targeted by organized crime networks in Central America. To 
>>>>>>>>>>>> return 
>>>>>>>>>>>> them to these criminal elements without a proper adjudication of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> their 
>>>>>>>>>>>> cases is unconscionable.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And in 2011, the Catholic Bishops advocated for passage 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=15398>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the DREAM Act, which would provide permanent legal status, some 
>>>>>>>>>>>> call it 
>>>>>>>>>>>> amnesty, to young people under 35 brought into the U.S. illegally 
>>>>>>>>>>>> by their 
>>>>>>>>>>>> parents if they had been here in the country since the age of 16 
>>>>>>>>>>>> or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> younger, provided they had completed two years of college or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> military 
>>>>>>>>>>>> service.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Conflicts of interest?*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan Cadman, with the Center for Immigration Studies, says it’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>> a conflict of interest for a group that benefits financially from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration – both legal and illegal – to try to influence 
>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration 
>>>>>>>>>>>> policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “It bothers me that any private organization is using a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> government funding stream for that purpose, not only Catholic 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Charities but 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lutheran World Service, the Episcopal Church, they’ve all got 
>>>>>>>>>>>> their hands 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the pie,” Cadman said. “The thing is that everyone understands 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> with a wink and a nod, this so-called emergency money (from Obama) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> is not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> going to result in any substantial number of individuals being 
>>>>>>>>>>>> deported. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s just not. How ironic to see an emergency budget supplemental 
>>>>>>>>>>>> request 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and then when you look at the details you see it’s all going to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>> chewed 
>>>>>>>>>>>> up for things like brick and mortar buildings for resettlement and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> not used 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in any useful way to stop this tidal wave of human beings.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cadman said there is “no doubt in my mind” that the religious 
>>>>>>>>>>>> NGOs or “non-governmental organizations” are working with the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> United 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nations to get the children qualified as refugees or asylum 
>>>>>>>>>>>> seekers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “The religious charities have had a hand in that,” he said. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> “There’s no doubt in my mind they are looking to afford people 
>>>>>>>>>>>> status in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> any way, shape or form because the end game is to not get them 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sent back to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> their country of origin.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Children don’t qualify as refugees*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Frank Head Jr., director of Immigration Services for Catholic 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Charities of Arkansas, said the Central American children would 
>>>>>>>>>>>> not qualify 
>>>>>>>>>>>> as refugees under the current United Nations definition, but it’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>> not out 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the question that a special legal status could be created for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> children.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “There’s no easy pat answer to that,” he told WND. “They will 
>>>>>>>>>>>> not get refugee status. That’s never been the case. There is a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> special set 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of regulations for children not accompanied by parents, but no 
>>>>>>>>>>>> immediate 
>>>>>>>>>>>> status. They get put into a special adjudication system. They 
>>>>>>>>>>>> never get 
>>>>>>>>>>>> called ‘refugees’ but there is a category, a process where a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> juvenile who 
>>>>>>>>>>>> is basically an orphan with no family to claim them could get a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> certain 
>>>>>>>>>>>> status (as an asylum seeker) after a lengthy court battle.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That court battle could be fought with federally funded 
>>>>>>>>>>>> lawyers, a development even more likely if Obama’s $3.7 billion in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> emergency aid gets passed by Congress.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “The actual answer, everyone wants to know (about the status), 
>>>>>>>>>>>> but the Obama administration has proposed a new set of regulations 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and $3.7 
>>>>>>>>>>>> billion to fund it,” Head said. “A juvenile, aside from the fact 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that they 
>>>>>>>>>>>> get special treatment if caught, and only in recent years have 
>>>>>>>>>>>> they been 
>>>>>>>>>>>> afforded that special status – they used to get thrown into adult 
>>>>>>>>>>>> jails – 
>>>>>>>>>>>> they now get treated as a juvenile. But there isn’t any immediate 
>>>>>>>>>>>> status. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely there is intensive meetings going on to possibly create 
>>>>>>>>>>>> some new 
>>>>>>>>>>>> status because the current refugee law doesn’t apply. They 
>>>>>>>>>>>> couldn’t 
>>>>>>>>>>>> qualify.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s because a refuge by definition is someone who has been 
>>>>>>>>>>>> pre-screened by the U.N. and then allowed to legally enter a host 
>>>>>>>>>>>> country.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “But these kids for the most part don’t qualify as refugees 
>>>>>>>>>>>> because you have to be part of a designated group facing political 
>>>>>>>>>>>> or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> religious persecution, but these are just kids fleeing from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> violence. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> They’re not running off all right-wing children or all left-wing 
>>>>>>>>>>>> children 
>>>>>>>>>>>> or government-inclined children,” Head said. “It’s not a religious 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sect, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s not a political group, so they wouldn’t qualify for asylum 
>>>>>>>>>>>> status and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> so you would ultimately just ship them back and that’s what a lot 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of people 
>>>>>>>>>>>> want to do. You have a pretty good idea who that is.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Head said he doesn’t expect the Obama package to pass the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican-dominated House.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pursuing the U.N.’s channels would be a totally separate 
>>>>>>>>>>>> approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “That would have to be for people who hadn’t entered the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> country yet,” Head said. “The U.N. would have to setup an office 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in say 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Guatemala or El Salvador and you could come there, make a case and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly 
>>>>>>>>>>>> get refugee status and get a safe place to come. Even if the U.N. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> approves 
>>>>>>>>>>>> you it doesn’t mean the U.S. will let you in. But if someone’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>> already here 
>>>>>>>>>>>> you have to apply for asylum status.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He said the U.S. lets in 75,000 to 85,000 foreign refugees a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> year. “And at any given time there’s several million in the world.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is separate from the unaccompanied alien children who 
>>>>>>>>>>>> illegally cross the border and offer themselves up to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>> apprehended by 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Border Patrol agents then get turned over the Health and Human 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Services and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> given a piece of paper ordering them to appear at a deportation 
>>>>>>>>>>>> hearing two 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to three years down the road.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Read more at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/religious-charities-profit-from-open-borders/#S3JjHEIbWJ61tGx8.99
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 8:39:39 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, 13 October 2016 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Will Hillary Clinton’s “Open Borders” Dream End Up Deciding 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Election — for Trump? *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Written by  William F. Jasper 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/itemlist/user/53-williamfjasper>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Description: Will Hillary Clinton’s “Open Borders” 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dream End Up Deciding Election — for Trump?] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/media/k2/items/cache/88753bd16644c0558ada2e5c88abfccd_XL.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategists surely breathed a huge 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sigh of relief when the 2nd Presidential Debate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24245-media-s-anti-trump-bias-obvious-in-second-presidential-debate>ended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without any mention of Clinton’s “open borders” comments, which 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> had 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently been released by WikiLeaks. They know that, as with the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brexit vote 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/23501-independence-day-historic-brexit-victory-uk-votes-to-leave-eu>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the UK in June, the deadly reality of “open borders” could end 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> up having 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a much greater impact on Election Day than the pro-Hillary media 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> polls are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> showing. British voters revolted against the massive “Project 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fear” campaign 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/23488-brexit-crunch-time-cameron-co-ratchet-up-project-fear-before-vote>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> waged by Prime Minister David Cameron, President Obama, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtually all 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the British political, banking, academic, and media 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> establishment. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> British voters demanded a return of their independence and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sovereignty. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Especially, they demanded control over their own borders, defying 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> European Union’s claim of the right to decide who (and how many) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> may 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> migrate to Britain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, Team Hillary’s strategists were undoubtedly relieved when 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CNN’s Anderson Cooper and ABC’s Martha Raddatz did them a big 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> favor in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> second presidential debate last Sunday by saving their candidate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> having to face her record and policies on open borders, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refugees, illegal alien amnesty, and trade treaties. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Specifically, Cooper 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Raddatz made sure nobody brought up the matter of Hillary 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> speech to Brazilian bankers in which she told of her “dream” of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an EU-style 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hemispheric union of “open trade and open borders.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The “open borders” speech was one of many Clinton bombshells 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be dropped by the WikiLeaks organization, in a dump of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thousands of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hacked e-mails, two days before the debate. It goes to the heart 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> timely and vital issue that millions of American voters consider 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> very 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> important. However, Cooper and Raddatz were intent on avoiding 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the open 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> borders issue and insisted on obsessing instead on the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conveniently leaked 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> video of Donald Trump’s vulgar comments from more than a decade 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Specifically, in a speech to the Brazilian megabank, Banco 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itau, Mrs. Clinton said: "My dream is a hemispheric common 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> market, with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> open trade and open borders, sometime in the future with energy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> opportunity for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> every person in the hemisphere."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The social chaos, terrorism, debt, banking crisis, currency 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> crisis, and other crises under which the European common market 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> disintegrating, offer little to commend the European Union as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hemispheric 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> model for Americans. The ongoing migration tsunami that is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wracking and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruining the EU gives us a pretty good picture of what “open 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> borders” look 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like. Europeans are finding out that the ugly reality is far 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> different from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rosy pictures painted for decades by their politicians — 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> politicians of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same internationalist mold as Hillary Clinton. Borders 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter; if you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don’t have them you can’t enforce them, and you don’t really even 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> country.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton is extremely vulnerable on this issue, even if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we do not experience another terror attack by Islamic extremists 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> country before the November election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton has leapfrogged over her former boss, President Obama, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and called for an even more radical Syrian refugee policy than 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> his very 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unpopular program. In fact, she called for more than six times 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the number 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of refugees proposed by Obama. In a 2015 interview, she said the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> United 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> States should accept 65,000 refugees from Syria; President 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obama’s Syrian 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refugee plan, at the time, was for 10,000.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "We're facing the worst refugee crisis since the end of World 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> War II and I think the United States has to do more," the former 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> secretary 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of state said on CBS's *Face the Nation*. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-u-s-should-take-65000-syrian-refugees/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  "I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to see us move from what is a good start with 10,000 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 65,000 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and begin immediately to put into place the mechanisms for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vetting the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people that we would take in."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, the “mechanisms for vetting people” comment was an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> obligatory throwaway line meant to placate voters’ national 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> security 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerns. But it was totally devoid of content, since our top 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> security officials have repeatedly pointed out 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/21638-no-vetting-of-syrian-refugees-in-obama-s-resettlement-invasion>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no way for us to properly vet these “refugees.” However, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refugee issue is only one part of Hillary’s “open borders” 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> equation; she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has also spent a political lifetime — as first lady, senator, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> secretary of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> state, Clinton Foundation chieftess — promoting and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-and-immigration/>illegal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alien amnesty, increased immigration, entitlements of every kind 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants (legal and illegal) and fast-track citizenship, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fast-track 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beyond the refugee/migrant/immigrant matters that are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> big-ticket items for the large pool of voters Donald Trump is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aiming at, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is the “open trade” and “hemispheric common market” 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> component that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> crosses party and ideological lines, energizing huge numbers of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conservative Republicans, Ron Paul Libertarians, and Bernie 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats and Independents. To this broad swath of Americans, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WikiLeaks 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> “open borders” leak confirms Hillary’s firm commitment to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deadly trade 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deals such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/21010-10-reasons-why-you-should-oppose-obamatrade>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the past year and a half, Hillary has been trying to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince voters that despite her role in helping craft the TPP 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and TTIP (as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> secretary of state), publicly praising it more than 45 times (as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the pro-Clinton CNN notes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/15/politics/45-times-secretary-clinton-pushed-the-trade-bill-she-now-opposes/>),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> having described the TPP as the “gold standard” of trade 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreements. Much 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the opposition to the TPP, the TTIP, and other multilateral 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "trade" 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreements of this type has focused on the enormous economic harm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NAFTA has done, especially in terms of millions of lost jobs and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the loss 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of America's once world-dominant manufacturing and technology 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> base. Equally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> important, though less understood, however, are the numerous 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attacks on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> national sovereignty woven into the fabrics of NAFTA, TPP, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TTIP. Like 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the various treaties that have incrementally transformed the EU 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> centralized and increasingly tyrannical behemoth it has become, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regional "trade" treaties actually establish bodies with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislative, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> executive, and judicial functions that are designed to gradually 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> transform 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> into a regional government that will override our own 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutionally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> limited government. Hillary Clinton is well aware of these 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dangers that she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has helped build into the TPP and TTIP. The believability of her 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenient 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> flip-flop on this crucial issue is about zero; she can be counted 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> flip again, if she gets to the Oval Office. Her current anti-TPP 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stance is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> most certainly her “public position,” at the moment, but what 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> really intend to do on the matter? One of the other inconvenient 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clinton) WikiLeaks revelations concerned her admission of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> duplicity, in one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of her high-paid speeches to high-end investors, asserting that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> politicians 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to be two-faced, having "both a public and a private 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> position."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Project Fear/Project Smear*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The political/business/media/academic elites that targeted the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brexit vote for defeat with “Project Fear” are the same 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> combined forces that have targeted Donald Trump with Project 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Smear 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/23440-bilderberg-elites-stop-trump-boost-hillary-stop-brexit-boost-migration>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Brexit victory, an obviously chastened Richard Haass, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> president of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> world government-promoting, pro-EU, pro-open borders Council 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Foreign Relations 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/1213-council-on-foreign-relations>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  (CFR), 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commented 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-brexit-warning-trump-2016-6>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  "For 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton's campaign, this is something of a warning not to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> underestimate this disaffection, not to underestimate political 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> economic nationalism."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton, who, while secretary of state, famously said 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (in the presence of her “good friend” Richard Haass) that she 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> depended upon 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CFR to tell her what to do and what to think (see video of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> her 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confession here 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/15288-cfr-brookings-celebrate-obama-lovefest-for-international-criminal-court>),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is obviously listening to the advice of Haass. She has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> flip-flopped on TPP 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and has sort of flip-flopped on migration-refugees. She is trying 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to appeal 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to all sides; appealing for the Hispanic/immigrant vote by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> “comprehensive immigration reform” — the longtime code phrase for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amnesty 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and open borders — while at the same time attempting to appeal to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Middle 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> America by insisting she intends to implement stringent vetting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refugees/immigrants. The open question is how many American 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> voters will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe her new “public position” on open borders — and how many 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe — or be influenced by/distracted by — Project Smear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> software. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> __._,_.___
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <beo...@westerndefense.net> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit Your Group 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMzgwdTJwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzY0MDIzNzE->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlN2sxc2c4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3NjQwMjM3Mg-->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Privacy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> __,_._,___
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>  
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to