Yep, and if that is all I said, then it would be an insult only post.
On Nov 9, 6:15 pm, wncs woke up in a blue state <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "against the person" > > Would calling someone an "ignorant ass" repeatedly count as an > argument against that person? > > On Nov 9, 8:35 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 9, 5:31 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Empirical evidence. Hmmm! > > > Yes, the type we can both look at and then supposedly discuss in an > > Adult manner... > > > Like your posts on this Forum. > > > Everyone can see the things you say, and understand that you are > > making your argument "against the person" rather than the points the > > person has made (Ad Hominem). > > > That is Empirical Evidence of the first Order. > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
