The definition was not given to change any Statute.
Your continued inability to spin it, and obfuscate notwithstanding.
On Nov 9, 10:08 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> they did not and could not change statute. your boys fucked up.... and they
> knew it when they asked the question.
>
> On 11/8/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Then why do you suppose the COURT allowed the Prosecution, for
> > purposes of the Deposition, to give Clinton a DEFINITION of Sex, which
> > included the acts that Clinton committed, BEFORE HE ANSWERED THE DAMN
> > QUESTION?!??!?!?!?!?
>
> > You think he missunderstood the WRITTEN WORD IN FRONT OF HIS FUCKING
> > FACE?!?!?!?!?
>
> > You are either as ignorant as shit, or you are Partisan out yer Ass.
>
> > And I believe it is likely both.
>
> > On Nov 8, 7:10 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > in the DC congressionally approved statute they have separate
> > definitions.
> > > I never said sodomy was not sex.
>
> > > he lied if you allow that by statute sodomy is sex. in DC ........not.
> > This
> > > is why the prosecuter phrased that question that way.... "For the
> > purposes
> > > of this hearing............" and went on to give definitions "For the
> > > purposes of this hearing..."
>
> > > By DC statute (which to my knowledge has not been changed) he told the
> > > "legal" truth. (extreme hair splitting)
>
> > > with the prosecutors "NEW" definitions for the hearing.... he lied. But
> > > those definitions would NOT stand later if brought to civil trial.
>
> > > They knew which question to ask and which term to use and did
> > not..........
>
> > > or do you prefer to think they hadn't read the statute??
>
> > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:16 PM, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > So Mark, sodomy is not sex?
>
> > > > He lied, to a grand jury, and to the special investigator, and he got
> > > > away with it, something that numerous Americans have been imprisoned
> > > > for. Have you read the statute? He lied.
>
> > > > On Nov 8, 5:52 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > what lie??? read the DC statute as to what constitutes sex. then read
> > the
> > > > DC
> > > > > statute as to what constitutes sodomy. Under the statute he told the
> > > > truth
> > > > > (he did not have sex, he did commit sodomy), under the "special"
> > > > > term/definition invented just for his questioning (never used before
> > OR
> > > > > after his inquisition) the special council tried to trick slick willy
> > > > into
> > > > > answering the charge...... he stuck with statute and got off (again).
> > > > Smart
> > > > > man.
>
> > > > > Had they asked him about SODOMY and he lied (said no) it would have
> > been
> > > > al
> > > > > over for him. They knew that, he knew that, people like you do not
> > know
> > > > that
> > > > > because they don't do their homework.
>
> > > > > It was a GAME!!!!
>
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:41 PM, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > You are kidding. A guy who perfected the lie?
>
> > > > > > On Nov 8, 2:10 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Bill would make a great justice.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 8, 1:50 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Ramakazee,
>
> > > > > > > > Better check first to see if they have a football team.
>
> > > > > > > > On Nov 8, 1:39 pm, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Ireland here I come if that happens...
>
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 8, 10:52 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Even worse: both of them on court.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Kamakazee <
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > She was a valient lil trooper the last few weeks, working
> > her
> > > > > > chubby
> > > > > > > > > > > hips almost to the bone campaigning in FL and OH (both of
> > > > which
> > > > > > Obama
> > > > > > > > > > > won).
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Now the question becomes, what goodies does she get?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I dunno, but it's gonna be good I thinik.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Watch. Wait. See.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > PS. Worst case scenario: Hillbilly Bill on the USSC.
>
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mark M. Kahle
> > > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me-
> > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > Mark M. Kahle
> > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me-
> > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Mark M. Kahle
> Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- Hide
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
