Once again you surprise me with your insight Woody. : - ))) CW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hollywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PoliticalForum" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 08:07 Subject: Re: McCain: Americans don't want a sore loser
gaar, No more than you have a problem with wncs NOT doing so. You confuse being ABLE to do something with being WILLING or WANTING to. Like I said, control freak. The ladies fucking HATE that. On Nov 12, 6:40 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Never said she had or needed to, just pointing out CW is able to > discuss her position... > > Not sure why you have a problem with that? > > Again you don't address what I said, but rather what YOU believe I > said. > > Imagine that. > > Hypocrite. > > On Nov 12, 4:30 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > Appear to be grown women, and quite rational. Maybe they just don't > > give a fuck what you want them to do and could care less about > > infoming you of their motives. Women can get like that you know. > > > CW discussed her position with you so now wncs HAS and/or needs to? > > You got control issues lad. > > > On Nov 12, 5:48 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It doesn't enrage me, it just makes me want them to LOOK and DISCUSS > > > the FACTS, so I can see what the motives for their position are... > > > > Please note: CW had no problem discussing her position with me. > > > > On Nov 12, 3:39 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > This is absolutely fucking fascinating. Two ladies who normally do > > > > not > > > > see eye to eye on political issues seem to have, at least for the > > > > time > > > > being, found some sort of common ground and are attempting to have > > > > civil dialoge. > > > > > And it seems to ENRAGE you. VERY revealing. > > > > > On Nov 12, 4:41 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 12, 2:26 pm, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > ...you are actually one of the > > > > > > more reasonable and thoughtful people on the board (for the most > > > > > > part). > > > > > > Yeah, as long as you don't cherish the Constitution, and the > > > > > things it > > > > > stands for... > > > > > > And as long as you don't mind your decisions being the cause of > > > > > the > > > > > breakdown of not only our Capitalistic System, but also that suc > > > > > things help lead to the demise of our Constitution. > > > > > > The last time we had so many things stripped from our Constitution > > > > > was > > > > > during FDR's Administration. > > > > > > Why do you think I keep suggesting you BOTH go LEARN your > > > > > History?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
