It's absurd to suggest that if I am not adopting children I have no
right to try to protect them.

On Jan 13, 2:08 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you are not part of the solution you should not be part of the decision.
> If you don't vote you give up the right to bitch about it.
> If you vote Hamas into power don't cry when you get bombed.
> If you do not obey the law expect to go to jail.
> If you do not have the disease/infliction/problem and it does not personally
> a/e ffect you nor are you asked for an opinion or help it is none of
> your business.
>
> If you insist on being part of the decision process then you must be
> willing to be part of the results.
>
> Which of the above is absurd ??
>
> On 1/13/09, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > JC, I was merely pointing out the absurdity of the notion that if
> > you're not adopting children you can't argue against performing late
> > term abortions.
>
> > On Jan 13, 12:54 pm, "J.C." <eaprent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > You are comparing two different entities.  There are too many
> > > unwanted, and unadoptable, children as it is.  I personally could not
> > > choose to have an abortion, but I do not know, nor understand, the
> > > reasoning of another person, and why this person would choose to have
> > > one.  There are circumstances that may surround the issue which we are
> > > not apprised of, and therefore, cannot make a reasonable decision in
> > > reference to.
>
> > > As for the elderly - again, that should be a personal decision, free
> > > from the controls of the general public.  If someone is terminal, and
> > > chooses to end his life, then his choice should be respected.
> > > Bringing up convicted murderers doesn't even make sense; they are
> > > incarcerated for a reason, and not all liberals oppose capital
> > > punishment - I don't.
>
> > > On Jan 13, 10:39 am, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > TAO,
>
> > > > By this logic; must we assume responsibility for the elderly on life
> > > > support in order to argue against euthanasia?  Must we take home or
> > > > personally fund the incarceration of a convicted murderer in order to
> > > > oppose capital punishment?
>
> > > > On Jan 13, 12:03 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Quakko, how many have YOU adopted to support your position ??
>
> > > > > On Jan 13, 6:00 am, Ohio mark <marsupialm...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > when will your blood lust be satisfied murky?  when there are 50
> > > > > > million bodies tossed in dumpsters?  60, 70, 100 million?  nazi.
>
> > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:31 am, "florida mike  !" <littlemike...@gmail.com> 
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Thank god ! we still have doctors like this one who are willing to
> > > > > > > treat women despite the Nazi like attacks by the right wing of the
> > > > > > > GOP
>
> > > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:25 am, Ohio mark <marsupialm...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > While Kansas doctor George Tiller is still fighting accusations 
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > illegally aborting 19 viable babies, an undercover sting 
> > > > > > > > operation
> > > > > > > > conducted by a pro-life organization revealed his clinic 
> > > > > > > > intentionally
> > > > > > > > underestimating fetal age and viability to dodge state laws.
>
> > > > > > > > According to a sworn statement, a pregnant mother calling 
> > > > > > > > herself
> > > > > > > > "Shaye" received a sonogram from Tiller's clinic determining 
> > > > > > > > her baby
> > > > > > > > was beyond the allowed legal age of abortion, but the test's
> > > > > > > > administrator "threw it into a trashcan" and recalculated a 
> > > > > > > > lesser
> > > > > > > > gestational age. The clinic scheduled Shaye for an abortion 
> > > > > > > > four days
> > > > > > > > later.
>
> > > > > > > > Shaye, working undercover with the pro-life organization 
> > > > > > > > Operation
> > > > > > > > Rescue, later that day received two additional sonograms from 
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > medical centers, both showing the baby beyond the legal 
> > > > > > > > abortion age.
> > > > > > > > Further, even at the age recalculated by Tiller's clinic, the 
> > > > > > > > abortion
> > > > > > > > four days later would have still been beyond the age of 
> > > > > > > > viability.
>
> > > > > > > > "This evidence warrants further investigation by law enforcement
> > > > > > > > authorities," said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman in a
> > > > > > > > statement on ChristianNewsWire. "This is convincing proof that, 
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > spite of already facing 19 criminal charges, Tiller continues 
> > > > > > > > to flout
> > > > > > > > the law to the danger of women and their babies."
>
> > > > > > > > As WND reported, Tiller, whose abortion work was featured in a 
> > > > > > > > recent
> > > > > > > > profile by WND columnist Jack Cashill, faces accusations for 
> > > > > > > > aborting
> > > > > > > > viable babies without obtaining the legally required, 
> > > > > > > > independent
> > > > > > > > second opinion affirming the medical necessity for late-term
> > > > > > > > abortions.
>
> > > > > > > >http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85944-Hidequot...-
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Mark M. Kahle
> Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- Hide 
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to