AP Continues to Perpetuate US-Kyoto 1997 Mythology
  
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2009/03/28/ap-continues-to-perpetuate-us-kyoto-1997-mythology/>

Filed under: Economy <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/economy/>, 
Environment <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/environment/>, MSM 
Biz/Other Bias <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/msm-biz-bias/>, MSM 
Biz/Other Ignorance 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/msm-biz-ignorance/>, Taxes & 
Government <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/taxes-government/> --- 
TBlumer @ 11:04 am

No environment-related historical myth seems stronger than the one 
claiming that if it weren't for the Republican Congress in the late 
1990s and President George W. Bush after that, the US would have 
ratified the Kyoto Treaty and would be under mandatory strictures 
designed to combat alleged "global warming" --- which, as frequently 
noted here and elsewhere, has been, depending on the source referenced, 
on hiatus for eight years to over a decade 
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3624242/There-IS-a-problem-with-global-warming...-it-stopped-in-1998.html>.

In an article about the Obama administration's upcoming involvement in 
international negotiations about so-called "climate change" after what 
he calls "eight years on the sidelines" ("US takes new climate change 
agenda to global talks"), the Associated Press's Dina Capiello continued 
the wire service's dishonorable long-term perpetuation of the GOP-bad, 
Dems-good myth (just a few previous posts on other AP examples are here 
<http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/04/02/here-we-kyoto-again-ap-lets-false-claim-bush-pulled-out-stand>,
 
here 
<http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2007/12/12/ap-bookends-year-repeating-kyoto-myth>,
 
and here <http://newsbusters.org/node/10190> at NewsBusters; here 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/04/02/here-we-kyoto-again-ap-lets-false-claim-that-bush-pulled-out-stand/>,
 
here 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/12/12/ap-bookends-the-year-by-repeating-a-kyoto-myth/>,
 
and here 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2007/01/16/this-is-really-ignorant-even-by-ap-standards/>
 
at BizzyBlog) by writing that 
<http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLIMATE_NEGOTIATIONS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2009-03-28-07-11-41>:

    And unlike 1997, when the Kyoto Protocol was drafted, there is now a
    Democratic-controlled Congress moving to embrace mandatory limits on
    greenhouse gases.

Yeah, if it weren't for those nasty Republicans, Bill Clinton and Al 
Gore would have gotten Kyoto ratified, and all would be right with the 
world.

Uh, not exactly.

For the umpteenth time, this is the truth about what happened in 1997, 
as noted in this 2005 Wall Street Journal editorial 
<http://www.opinionjournal.com/weekend/hottopic/?id=110007665>:

    In 1997, the U.S. Senate adopted the Byrd-Hagel Resolution by 95-0,
    urging the Clinton Administration not to sign any climate-change
    protocol that "would result in serious harm to the economy." In 1998
    Al Gore signed the Protocol. Yet President Clinton .... never
    submitted it to the Senate.

At the time, there were 45 Democrats 
<http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/one_item_and_teasers/partydiv.htm> 
in the Senate. Obviously, at least 40 Democrats voted for the Byrd-Hagel 
Resolution.

Another clear and inconvenient truth is that Gore's signature was only 
symbolic.

The difference between 2009 and 1997 is not, as Capiello implies, that 
Congress is controlled by Democrats. It's that there is a Congress that 
happens to be controlled by Democrats may be, as Capiello claims without 
qualification and without providing clear evidence, "moving to embrace 
mandatory limits on greenhouse gases."

One thing that hasn't changed is AP's dogged and disgraceful insistence 
on misleading readers about what really happened with Kyoto.

/Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org./


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to