Again when Clinton did try to do something about Bin Laden the Republican obstructionists started shouting 'Wag the dog', how quickly you fools forget!
On May 1, 3:52 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > You are rewriting history again. Clinton was offered bin Laden several > times and the only attempt he made was to bomb a baby milk factory. He > asked for and got legislation that approved a regime change for Iraq if > Saddam did not continue allowing the UN testers in to verify the > destruction of WMD. Other than that they never stopped him going after > the ones attacking our embassies or our troops. He just never went > after them except when he needed to get the news off his mistakes. It > may be more coincidence than causality but every time Clinton got in a > corner Saddam got bombed. Funny, that. > > VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > Actually when he tried Republicans blocked Clinton > > with the 'wag the dog' BS. > > > How quickly we forget > > > On May 1, 1:26 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Just like doing nothing for 8 years while the WTC was attacked, our > >> embassies were attacked, our military were attacked, the USS Cole was > >> attacked and Al Qaeda eventually decided that it was safe to attack the > >> WTC on 9/11, all the while that the primary intelligence agencies were > >> specifically kept from sharing what they knew thanks to the > >> wrong-headedness of an attorney general and her primary assistant. That > >> did a whole lot for our image. > > >> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > >>> Killing 100.000 s of innocent Iraqis kept the US safe how? > >>> Torturing hundreds of Iraqis kept the US safe how? > >>> Keeping innocent people in prison for 7 years kept the > >>> US safer how? > >>> Not getting Bin Laden and allowing Al qaeda safe haven > >>> in Pakistan to reconstitute and become an even greater threat > >>> with the possibility of getting Pakistan nuclear material kept the > >>> US safer how? > > >>> THAT is the full scope of the problems Bush Apologists NEVER > >>> address. > > >>> On May 1, 12:47 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Our beloved Zero made noises about sending them all home or somewhere > >>>> not in a prison. This now states that at least Zero understands that > >>>> some of these guys are really dangerous. That is one thing he learned. > >>>> He has also backtracked on a lot of the other things he was going to do > >>>> right away once he realized the full scope of the problems. I still > >>>> don't trust him in the job. > > >>>> Hollywood wrote: > > >>>>> dick, > > >>>>> Anyone ever claim that NONE of the prisoners were legimate? > > >>>>> On May 1, 10:38 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>http://www.mercurynews.com/nationworld/ci_12266824?source=email --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
