Keith how does a civil union endanger YOUR marriage, answer that one for me.
On May 2, 11:27 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > As I said in another thread, I am catching up, its been a busy week. > > Hey Rigs!! > > I only wish that I had a whole lotta women hangin' out here at the Keith In > Tampa Hacienda. I would be delighted to put on a little show!! No, Renee > still comes around, mainly to bitch, gripe, and make me take her out > somewhere expensive. She would definitely be quashing/putting the hiatus on > gals coming over here in the front lawn....It ain't gonna happen I don't > think..... > > Sugarshack and Holly, > > The standard still exists in this Nation, which is that most, the majority > of Americans, believe that it is wrong by a bunch of secularist far left > socialists attempting to change the definition of marriage. Marriage is > still to this day, an ecclisiastical function, there is no such thing as a > "civil marriage" as hard as secularists want to make it so. > > Most Americans have no problem with civil unions, in fact, California has a > civil union law in place now. That was not good enough for folks like Perez > Hilton, they want to redefine marriage, and they want to shove their > lifestyle down our throats, if you disagree, then you are immediately > branded a "homophobe". It has nothing whatsoever to do with equal rights. > NOTHING!!! > > My point being, is your "standards" from the mid to late 19th century is > misplaced Holly, and Sugarshack, wake up and smell the coffee!!! Put down > the cocktails, step away from the pharmaceuticals, and no more ganja for > you!!! > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Let's rewind the tape, The STANDARD is stupidity > > and that is the dumb blond and YOU identify with > > the dumb blond's ideas. So the TWO of you have the > > same STANDARDS, So if attaining the STANDARD is > > Nirvana, do you need me to continue connecting the dots, or are you > > to stupid to make it to nirvana, Dick? > > > On Apr 30, 7:51 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nirvana is when you attained the standard. Since stupidity is the > > > standard, you are not being intelligent and I am not being stupid. You > > > really need to think things through before you respond. > > > > VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > And you are merely average, Nirvana meaning in my case > > > > being intelligent and in your case, stupid. > > > > > On Apr 30, 7:32 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> You must have attained nirvana then. > > > > >> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > >>> Stupidity is a standard we should all be striving for? > > > > >>> On Apr 30, 7:25 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> You really are a putz. The US had standards for a long while and > > this > > > >>>> girl reflected those standards well. They served us just fine until > > the > > > >>>> people like Perez Hilton came along. Believe it or not California > > has > > > >>>> been a part of the US for a good long while and a lot of the country > > > >>>> does agree with the standards Miss California talked about. > > > > >>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > >>>>> California is a country? > > > >>>>> That made sense to you? > > > > >>>>> On Apr 30, 7:02 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> She sure made a lot of sense to anyone who cares about the > > standards the > > > >>>>>> country lived by when it was building this nation. She made a lot > > of > > > >>>>>> sense to anyone who stands for their beliefs rather than spin in > > the > > > >>>>>> wind to point whatever direction is the latest fad. Maybe you > > just > > > >>>>>> failed to understand anyone with standards? > > > > >>>>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> The fact that the woman made no sense had nothing to do with > > > >>>>>>> her losing? So made the dumb blond stereotype seem to be a > > reality. > > > > >>>>>>> When did the Miss America contest become an important issue? > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 29, 12:15 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/29/finding-her-new-cause/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
