Keith, you idiot, I heard this BEFORE you posted! On May 4, 9:42 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Sugarshack, > > If you heard that "talking point" from three other "talking heads" this > week, then I am quite flattered! That means that whoever you are listening > too, is reading my posts here on PoliticalForum! > > With regard to your "spin"; for you to attempt to pin Nazi's, Skin-Heads > and the KKK on the Republican Party is laughable, when clearly, the only > announced members of the KKK were Democrats and socialists. Once again, > it demonstrates my point about those who claim to be "more tolerant, kinder, > gentler, and more enlightened", are none of the above, and genuinely have an > agenda. If one crosses that agenda or disagrees with it, then the far left > extremist smear machine gears up, and all folks like you can do is start > tossing personal barbs and insults. > > Again, for you to attempt to compare Bill Clinton to Ronald Reagan shows > your naivety, or just plain, outright ignorance. > > But I still enjoy ya!!! > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:53 PM, VT VirtualTruth > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Clinton had higher approval ratings than Reagan at the end of their > > Presidency's so your comment is not true. > > > Also once again you are repeating words and ideas other have spoon fed > > you or you have heard from the talking heads. > > > I heard the exact phase of 3 times in my lifetime the Republican > > party..... > > from 3 different talking heads this week end. Keith please try to be > > original or at least change the words! > > > On May 2, 8:36 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Studio, Studio, Studio, > > > > In my adult life, of which I have been politically active, I have seen > > > predicted, and witnessed folks like you profess the demise of the > > Republican > > > Party at least three times. When I was just able to vote, shortly after > > > the Nixon/Watergate era, (and which was the first and only time I ever > > voted > > > for a Democrat Presidential candidate) folks like you were predicting > > that > > > the demise of the Republican Party was imminent, that it was a "Brand New > > > Day, A Brand New World". After four years of Jimmy Carter, our Nation > > > overwhelmingly elected Ronald Reagan, the greatest American President in > > > yours and my lifetime, (Despite what my most esteemed moderator "The > > > Annointed One" believes!!! LOL!!!) > > > > Then, after "A thousand Points of Light" and the mediocrity of George > > > Herbert Walker Bush and his wife who remarkably resembled George > > Washington, > > > the Nation went into "Clinton-Mania". After two years of "I feel your > > pain" > > > and folks like you once again professing that "The Republican Party > > > Is Toast"; it wasn't two years later, that the Republicans gained > > control > > > of both the Senate and the House, as well as most all State legislatures > > and > > > local elected offices. > > > > I will concede, as I have previously, that the Republicans are a House in > > > disarray right now. That we lost our way, with a number of individuals > > who > > > infiltrated our Party who are not conservatives, and who were for the > > most > > > part, big spending egalitarians who hurt our Nation. > > > > Having said that, what has happened on your side of the aisle, (and Sean > > > "Sugarshack" VT's) is far more sinister. Americans are catching on to > > the > > > whole concept of "Change We Can Believe In", the tea parties were just a > > > taste. > > > > In eighteen months, the House will once again be controlled by thinking > > > Americans. Your socialist party os over my friend! Enjoy it while you > > > can!!! > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:17 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On May 2, 2:22 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey Studio!! > > > > > > Well, first, if we were going to get into political parties and, > > > > "racism", > > > > > you clearly identified the wrong party. I am unaware of any policy or > > any > > > > > plank of the Republican National Comittee that could even remotely be > > > > > construed as "racist"; albeit I know that a lot of "clueless" > > individuals > > > > > would somehow attempt to frame or promote such platforms as racist. > > > > > First off, the thread was started by Travis, not a political party, > > > > but one in > > > > which he clearly supports calling the President a "Muzzie", which he > > > > is clearly not. > > > > > Second, you must not think your party is very smart not to have > > > > included policy > > > > which would obviously shrink their ranks even further than it is now. > > > > > Third, there is no such stated policy in the Democrat platform > > > > either, > > > > so by your logic, would nullify all that you just stated. > > > > > > What was it you were saying about Republicans being, "racist"? Do > > you > > > > care > > > > > to revise this position Studio?? > > > > > No I don't, they are. > > > > But it's not a stated policy, rather a understated "soft racism" with > > > > a nod and a wink. > > > > Both parties have it, I never said they didn't. > > > > But it's slightly worse in the Republican Party. > > > > You won't find any statistics supporting this, I generally use my own > > > > ears and eyes > > > > instead of some phony Web site or reporters claims. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
