The woman lost not because of WHAT she said, but HOW she said it! She gave a rambling disjointed answer, that included California being a Country.
Sorry but if I want someone representing me, it is someone who can competently answer difficult questions under pressure. She couldn't, so she lost. End of story. However the Right needs SOMETHING other than torture to defend so they picked this girl. The religious Right is using her, she is using the Religious Right. This is about a sore loser and sour grapes. The better contestant won, and now that the nude photos are out, I am beginning to wonder about her 'clean image'. The only REAL winner in all of this is Trump, who is getting tons of publicity for free! On May 14, 10:38 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > *Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California* by Ann Coulter > Posted 05/13/2009 ET > Updated 05/13/2009 ET > > http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=31863 > > Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the > sight of a sexy Evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, > Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie > Prejean, have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals. > > Christians are supposed to be fat, balding sweaty little men with bad > complexions. It's liberals who are supposed to be the sexy ones. (I know > that from watching "The West Wing" and all movies starring Julia Roberts.) > > But sadly for liberals, in real life, the fat, balding sweaty little guy > with the bad complexion is Perez Hilton and the smoking-hot babe is Carrie > Prejean. > > This apparent contradiction incites violent anger in liberals, triggering > their famous "flight or flight" response. So liberal masturbators are, once > again, launching furious attacks on a beautiful Christian in a fit of pique > similar to the one directed at Joan of Arc. > > First, the Miss USA contest held a press conference to announce that Prejean > had breast implants. Take a Christian position in public and Satan's > handmaidens will turn all your secrets into front-page news. > > Next, a photographer released a single cheesecake photo of Prejean. This > prompted liberal reporters who have never met a Christian to proclaim that > Christians were outraged by the photo. Liberals believe abortion is a > sacrament, but smoking, wearing short skirts and modeling lingerie are > mortal sins. (And if wearing women's underwear is a basis for being > disqualified from the pageant, that's the end of Perez Hilton's judging > career.) > > Then on Monday some genuine "semi-nude" photos were released. These were not > what we'd call appropriate for a Christian. In a curiously similar attack, > the left's final attempt to destroy Paula Jones was to lure her into > appearing naked in Penthouse magazine. Oh well. > > Christians aren't people who believe they are without sin; they're people > who know they're sinners and are awestruck by God's grace in sending his > only Son to take the punishment they deserve. > > This is in contradistinction to liberals, all of whom believe they're on a > fast track to heaven on the basis of being "basically good" people -- and > also believe that anyone who disagrees with that theological view is evil. > > Finally (so far, anyway), reporters gleefully released the divorce records > of Prejean's parents. Because when you want the truth, what is more reliable > than angry accusations traded in the middle of an acrimonious divorce? > > Liberals used the divorce papers to argue that Prejean had some deep-seated > psychological disturbance causing her to oppose gay marriage. Symptoms of > this debilitating illness include a belief in some sort of "god" and a > reverence for the Bible. > > It's not as if Prejean's special talent in the Miss USA contest was to > perform an opposite-sex marriage. (Or, as the president and I call it, > "marriage.") She didn't even volunteer her "controversial" views on > marriage. Rather, she was asked for her opinion on gay marriage and gave it > -- in an answer wrapped in so many layers of sugar it took 10 minutes to get > to the point. > > "Well, I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one way or the > other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite > marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that > marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out > there. But that's how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between > a man and a woman." > > What a vicious hate-monger! Any second there I was expecting her to bust out > a "by golly!" or an "oh my gosh!" Angry gay-marriage supporters should be > happy they didn't get my version of that answer. It contains some terms you > won't find in your Bible. > > Liberals wouldn't attack James Dobson with the amount of bile they've > directed at a 21-year-old beauty contestant. It's not just Christianity -- > it's women liberals hate. > > From Jean-Paul Sartre, Pablo Picasso and Bertrand Russell, who treated women > -- mostly their mistresses -- like dogs, to Teddy Kennedy and Bill Clinton > in our own day, liberals are ferocious misogynists. They share Muslims' > opinion of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also support a > women's right to have an abortion and to perform lap dances. > > You'd be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal > American male. > > I'm not sure we needed a psychological profile of Prejean to figure out why > she holds the same position on gay marriage as: the president, the vice > president, the secretary of state, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards > and his mistress, and the vast majority of the American people. > > But what is crying out for an explanation is why every bubble-head TV news > anchorette from a nice, churchgoing red state ends up adopting the political > views of Karl Marx. > > From Katie Couric on CBS to Norah O'Donnell on MSNBC, the whole stable of TV > anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their liberal masters. > It's the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in the > mainstream media. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity and > severely restricts the vision. > > The only way to protect yourself is to do the liberal male's bidding, as the > bubble-head anchorettes do, or stand on the rock of Christianity. > > Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby > inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn't > care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a > piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her. > > ann_coulter.jpg > 54KViewDownload --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
