KIT, All I ever saw was ACORN encouraging people to get out and vote for the candidate of their choice.
Blog? Blogs are not the news media. Any fool can start a blog and say whatever the fuck he/she wants to. I sincerely hope any group of "dozens" who voted "hundreds of times" was caught, prosecuted and sent to jail. Where did this happen? On Jun 19, 10:45 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Holly, > > From a constitutional standpoint, I am not opposed to any group encouraging > individuals to vote, but not using my tax dollars while at the same time > endorsing a candidate that I don't support. That is illegal, and ACORN as > well as "Get Out The Vote" got away with it, unscathed. > > What ABC News is doing here next week is unprecedented. You, I, or no other > American has ever seen such a thing. There are laws that allow for the > President to be covered, on national television when he has a news > conference. That is not what ABC News is doing. > > When I say, "hardly cover"; I am talking about the hypocrisy in coverage. > By example, Fat Boy out in Orange County made the Moonbat's blog (and > probably the NYT's front page tomorrow). The dozens of ACORN Law students > who fraudulently voted hundreds of times didn't. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Hollywood > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > KIT, > > > What defines "enough" coverage for you? > > How do you define "hardly cover"? > > "Infomercial"? Any time the President of the United States opens his > > mouth, that's a legit news story. Sorry, that's the way it is. > > > Why would you be against ANY organization encouraging, even helping, > > people to exercise their Constituional right to vote? > > > On Jun 19, 9:52 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Holly & Studio, (And Richard!!) > > > > It's not that I dispute it, I just point out the hypocrisy. RIchard's > > > example of the New York Times and something like seven other news/media > > > organizations including McClatchie, Knight-Ridder, Hearst, Time Magazine > > and > > > others, joined in, and under the Florida Sunshine laws gathered the > > > information that indisputably established that President Bush won the > > > election here in Florida, yet as Richard pointed out, the story was > > buried. > > > This is true with so many stories, current events and issues, and > > frankly, I > > > don't recall our news organizations being so partisan and in the tank as > > > they are today. > > > > Here is ABC News doing an "infomercial" in the White House next week, and > > > hardly anyone or any media entity is mentioning this first of a kind > > event. > > > > Back to the point, I just sent links to a similar story that was hardly > > > covered only seven months ago, and yet the events surrounding ACORN and > > "Get > > > The Vote Out" was hardly covered by mainstream media. > > > > Neither Holly or Studio ever focus upon issues like this; it is only when > > > FOX News doesn't cowtow to some far left, minute story. > > > > Incidentally, I have been watching CNN for the last hour and a half, and > > > there has been nothing on CNN or Headline News regarding this story in > > that > > > amount of time..... > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Hollywood <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > bruce, > > > > > Do you dispute it or not? Simple enough question. > > > > > On Jun 19, 9:30 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > lame response > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 7:36 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Studio!!! > > > > > > > > I say this respectfully......Yea......You are....... > > > > > > > Then I'm running dead last then. > > > > > > > I posted a story from a blog, and there's nothing hypocritical > > about > > > > > > it unless it's the Fox News non-coverage of it because it's GOP > > > > > > related. > > > > > > > It might be one guy, I don't know, but he heads a company that does > > > > > > it, and was found guilty. > > > > > > > Do you dispute this?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
