No apology needed, but it was nice that you thought to do so. You are not such a bad guy ... :))
On Jul 27, 9:40 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > Richard, > > Was not talking about you specifically. I was using the "we" in the > collective sense. My apologies if misunderstood. > > On Jul 27, 6:33 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Not really. First, I was not condoning the complaining about Obama > > not providing a copy of his birth certificate for public consumption. > > In fact, I could care less. Second, I agree with you that doing so > > would set a bad precedent. Third, I used the Bush situation as proof > > of your claim, not as an excuse or as a tit for tat justification. > > Finally, I think the Dan Rather scenario should be a warning to those > > challeging Obama and that is why I mentioned it. Nobody should ever > > wish to sink to that level and entirely undermine their entire adult > > life with a single event. > > > On Jul 27, 3:23 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Richard, > > > > Of course I don't. But we're simply back to playing tit for tat. Non- > > > productive game of "well YOUR assholes are smellier than MY assholes". > > > > On Jul 27, 1:34 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > I don't think he caught my point. I am fairly certain he does not > > > > condone what Rather did. > > > > > On Jul 27, 1:30 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > Guys like Holly only have memories of convenience! > > > > > > *************************************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > On Jul 27, 2:25 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > You don't remember Dan Blather? > > > > > > > He was a Rather obnoxious little man. > > > > > > > On Jul 27, 1:22 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > Fine, we'll all just play partisan tit for tat partisan politics. > > > > > > > Will > > > > > > > this silly shit NEVER end? > > > > > > > How the hell would I know what happened to the guy? I'm their > > > > > > > fucking > > > > > > > King of something? > > > > > > > > On Jul 27, 1:10 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hollywood - > > > > > > > > > That is a very fair point. I could be wrong, but I seem to > > > > > > > > remember a > > > > > > > > lot of whining by some of my liberal friends that Bush did not > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > his National Guard records. As I recall, theu jumped to all > > > > > > > > sorts of > > > > > > > > spurious conclusions and I seem to remember one (not actually a > > > > > > > > friend) claiming that he had official documents proving the > > > > > > > > assumptions. I forget what happened to that liberal .... > > > > > > > > > Maybe you know. > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 11:21 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > > > Maybe we should not be assuming that it was done. > > > > > > > > > It could be as simple as the POTUS feeling that if he caves > > > > > > > > > in on > > > > > > > > > this the demands for proof of this or that will simply NEVER > > > > > > > > > end. > > > > > > > > > What's he supossed to do? Fed Ex a notarized and certifed > > > > > > > > > copy of his > > > > > > > > > birth certificate to each and every American citizen, all 300 > > > > > > > > > million? > > > > > > > > > Can you think of anything less that would shut up certain > > > > > > > > > people? THEN > > > > > > > > > they would bitch about wasting tax-payer money to do that. > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 8:31 pm, RichardForbes > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hollywood - > > > > > > > > > > > I will answer both you and Sarge. As I stated, my > > > > > > > > > > understanding is > > > > > > > > > > that all required documentation was provided. I assume > > > > > > > > > > that part of > > > > > > > > > > the process from election day to electoral college > > > > > > > > > > certification to > > > > > > > > > > innaugaration includes validation of citizenship. I cannot > > > > > > > > > > tell you > > > > > > > > > > who did the verification of citizenship, but I suspect that > > > > > > > > > > we have a > > > > > > > > > > process for that and it was followed. All that said, I > > > > > > > > > > still do not > > > > > > > > > > understand why he has not simply released documentation to > > > > > > > > > > verify his > > > > > > > > > > citizenship. He has more than enough problems on his hand > > > > > > > > > > to allow > > > > > > > > > > this one to keep raising its ugly head. Believe it or not, > > > > > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > > simply looking out for the President on this one and I have > > > > > > > > > > never > > > > > > > > > > questioned his legitimacy. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 8:19 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > > > > > > > > > Prove to whom? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 8:08 pm, RichardForbes > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually Sarge, it is Obama that is supposed to prove > > > > > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > > citizenship. It is not something to be disproved. > > > > > > > > > > > > That said, I was > > > > > > > > > > > > under the impression it had been adequately proven, > > > > > > > > > > > > though I have no > > > > > > > > > > > > idea why he will not disclose the documents. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 7:41 pm, SgtUSMC <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why does it matter? They don't need a Hawaiin birth > > > > > > > > > > > > > certificate. They > > > > > > > > > > > > > need to get the one in Kenya to prove their > > > > > > > > > > > > > accusation.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
