http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010080111207/editorial/12-reasons-to-ignore-ra
dical-islam.html

12 Reasons to Ignore Radical Islam
SUNDAY, 01 AUGUST 2010 17:12 FRESNOZIONISM.ORG <http://fresnozionism.org/>

Parents and spouses of firefighters lost on 9/11 take part in a protest
against the Ground Zero mosque on June 6, 2010
NY Times:
An influential Jewish organization [ADL] on Friday announced its opposition
to a proposed Islamic center and mosque two blocks north of ground zero in
Lower Manhattan, intensifying a fierce national debate about the limits of
religious freedom and the meaning of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Wrong.

It is not about "the limits of religious freedom". Nobody wants to limit the
freedom of Muslims or anyone else to practice their religion, always
assuming that the practice thereof violates no laws.

It is not about the meaning of 9/11. Even Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf agrees that
that was a terrorist attack perpetrated by radical Islamists.

No, it's not about those things. It is about whether we should allow  a
monument for the first step in the Islamic conquest of America - because
that is how it will be seen in the Islamic world - in a place where 2,750
people were burned or crushed to death in the name of Islam.

And here's another thing it's not about: domestic politics. The Times
writer, Michael Barbaro, wants us to think that it's just another partisan
issue:
...around the country opposition is mounting, fueled in part by Republican
leaders and conservative pundits. Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican
vice-presidential nominee, has urged "peace-seeking Muslims" to reject the
center, branding it an "unnecessary provocation." A Republican political
action committee has produced a television commercial assailing the
proposal. And former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has decried it in speeches.

Yeah, that's it. The whole thing is 'fueled' by nasty Republicans and worse.
Sarah Palin is radioactive to most Democrats and centrist Republicans, so
Mr. Barbaro makes sure to mention her, although her statement is
comparatively mild.

Newt Gingrich, on the other hand - who, I will remind you, holds a Ph.D in
History - nailed it when he said.

"The World Trade Center is the largest loss of American life on our soil
since the Civil War," Mr. Gingrich said. "And we have not rebuilt it, which
drives people crazy. And in that setting, we are told, why don't we have a
13-story mosque and community center?"

He added: "The average American just thinks this is a political statement.
It's not about religion, and is clearly an aggressive act that is
offensive."

Indeed. Anyone who can't see the strands of politics and ideology - a
particularly nasty form of expansionist politics and an anti-democratic,
medieval ideology - woven throughout Islam, is blind.

The ADL didn't go there. The ADL's statement that the Times said "touched
off angry reactions from a range of religious groups," merely suggested that
in deference to the expressed feelings of many of the 9/11 families, the
mosque should be built somewhere else.

This argument - an appeal to decency -  ought to be enough. But it's not,
for reasons which I am just beginning to analyze.

Some suggest that opposition to the mosque stems from 'bigotry', which in
their circles is the worst imaginable personality defect. But interestingly,
many of the same people wax furious about the Christian Right. Somehow, it
is bigoted to attack some forms of religious ideology, but not others.

Here are some of the reasons for not seeing the danger posed to the US by
radical Islam:

1. You are a Muslim who thinks it would be better if the US were governed in
accordance with Shaaria

2. You benefit in some way from Saudi petrodollars (this group includes
several ex-presidents)

3. You are an anti-Zionist or antisemite who wants to stick it to the Jews

4. You are Jewish and want to show your goyische friends that you're a
regular guy

5. You are afraid that Islam will be victorious and you want your future
rulers to like you

6. You are afraid but want to hide it, so you pretend that there's no danger

7. You want to back the 'strong horse'

8. You are a progressive and you see other progressives (including the
President) pretending that there's no danger, so you imitate them

9. You want to be on the other side of Newt Gingrich and especially Sarah
Palin

10. You are white and think opposing Islamic expansionism is racist and you
feel guilty for slavery and racism

11. You are black and think Islam is on the side of oppressed people of
color (never mind Sudan, the history of slavery, etc.)

12. You listen to KPFA [a Berkeley radio station] and have become convinced
that the US really is the great Satan and anything bad that happens to it is
good

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to