*The answer is no.
*
On 9/21/10, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Question is did those who have been discharged and were outed by others
> make a pass at those others repeatedly and were outed to get some peace from
> the harassment or why were they outed.  I would doubt that you can really
> tell us the reasons for the outing but it sounds very much as if there were
> a bunch of ActUp people there or their equivalent.   They also ruined a lot
> of lives and careers and reputations and crowed about doing so.   Pot,
> kettle, fire?
>
>
> On 09/21/2010 03:20 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>
>  *False.*
> **
> *Many who have been discharged have been outed by others.*
>
>
> On 9/21/10, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Tommy Boy,
>>
>> The law is quite literal...(extremely rare these days).. Don't Ask,
>> (the military doesn't) Don't Tell... that is left entirely up to the
>> individual... it must come FROM his or her mouth...( Little drum
>> roll ).... Not in it, to be valid as a career killer.
>>
>>
>> On Sep 21, 10:31 am, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > *No, Keith. Wrong. *
>> > *There have been countless backstabbing "efforts" and vendettas to "out"
>> > closeted and silent members of the military, including baiting,
>> spreading
>> > rumors, searching possessions and correspondence, entrapment, etc.*
>> > *It is those who chose to "enforce" the policy,  who caused it to fail.*
>> > **
>> > *Billions have been wasted on these witch hunts and discharges.*
>> > *DADT is a failure. Always has been. Since 1993. *
>> > **
>> > *Repeal it NOW, no further "delay". *
>> >
>> > On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > No Tom, the policy has worked fine.   It has been those who chose to
>> > > violate the policy who have had their "lives and carreers ruined".
>> >
>> > > Again, the military is no place for a "Gay Parade".......If you think
>> that
>> > > rescinding the DADT policy is going to somehow allow you and your
>> buddies to
>> > > get up and announce, "We're Here And We're Queer"; you are sadly
>> mistaken.
>> >
>> > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> *No, Keith, the DADT policy is a complete falure and it has never
>> worked.
>> > >> *
>> > >> **
>> > >> *Thousands of lives and careers have been ruined.*
>> > >> **
>> > >> *No further biased "study" or delay should be tolerated.
>> > >> *
>> >
>> > >>   On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >>> No Tom, the DADT was enacted, by the Clinton Administration in
>> 1993.  The
>> > >>> policy has worked, successfully for seventeen years.
>> >
>> > >>> Is it time to rescind the policy?  I tend to agree that it is, but
>> not
>> > >>> until such time as the military has a chance to weigh in, and
>> determine the
>> > >>> effects of such a change in policy, and "how/what" type of policy to
>> > >>> implement as a replacement.
>> >
>> > >>> Sexual practices has no place in our military.  There have been Gays
>> in
>> > >>> our military who have fought and defended our Nation since 1776.
>> No policy
>> > >>> is going to change that.   We especially don't want a military that
>> is
>> > >>> weakened by a bunch of folks with an agenda!!
>> >
>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Tommy News <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> > >>>> *No, Keith.*
>> > >>>> **
>> > >>>> *The Pentagon has had since 1993 to review this failed policy which
>> has
>> > >>>> ruined thousands of lives and careers.*
>> > >>>> **
>> > >>>> *No further delay is acceptable.*
>> > >>>> *Delay means do nothing.
>> > >>>> *
>> >
>> > >>>>  On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >>>>>   No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by some
>> > >>>>> secondary issue.
>> >
>> > >>>>> First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and
>> determine how
>> > >>>>> repeal of DADT will effect the military.  Second, and more
>> importantly, the
>> > >>>>> goal by the Marxists is to lock the Republicans out of amending
>> the proposed
>> > >>>>> Defense  Appropriations bill now before the Congress.  I don't
>> trust the
>> > >>>>> likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and a host of other Marxists
>> > >>>>> controlling the vote over Defense Appropriations.  You shouldn't
>> either.
>> >
>> > >>>>>  From CNN:
>> >
>> > >>>>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html
>> >
>> > >>>>> But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator Susan Collins
>> > >>>>> (Confused, Maine)  said she would side with the rest of the GOP
>> because the
>> > >>>>> Democratic leadership of the Senate "intends to shut Republicans
>> out of the
>> > >>>>> debate."
>> >
>> > >>>>> Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
>> Staff,
>> > >>>>> Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply not fair." But she said
>> Senate
>> > >>>>> Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give Republicans and
>> Democrats
>> > >>>>> "an equal opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense bill.
>> >
>> > >>>>> "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on the
>> majority
>> > >>>>> leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an agreement
>> so that the
>> > >>>>> Senate can debate the defense bill this week," Collins said.
>> >
>> > >>>>> In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would support a
>> > >>>>> Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be allowed a full
>> debate on
>> > >>>>> the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would vote on
>> repeal
>> > >>>>> before the military has completed its review.
>> >
>> > >>>>> "We should all have the opportunity to review that report which is
>> to
>> > >>>>> be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy and the
>> > >>>>> implementation of any new changes," Snowe's statement said.
>> >
>> > >>>>> The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense policy
>> bill,
>> > >>>>> would not rescind "don't ask, don't tell" until after the Pentagon
>> completes
>> > >>>>> a review of the repeal's impact on the military. The review is due
>> in
>> > >>>>> December and would serve as the basis for necessary certification
>> by the
>> > >>>>> president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
>> Staff that
>> > >>>>> the military could handle repealing the policy.
>> >
>> > >>>>> --
>> > >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > >>>>> For options & help seehttp://
>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > >>>>> * Visit our other community 
>> > >>>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >
>> > >>>> --
>> > >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> > >>>> Have a great day,
>> > >>>> Tommy
>> >
>> > >>>> --
>> > >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > >>>> For options & help seehttp://
>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > >>>> * Visit our other community 
>> > >>>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > >>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > >>> * Visit our other community 
>> > >>> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >
>> > >> --
>> > >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> > >> Have a great day,
>> > >> Tommy
>> >
>> > >> --
>> > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > >> * Visit our other community 
>> > >> athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > > * Visit our other community 
>> > > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> > Have a great day,
>> > Tommy
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at 
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>  --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>



-- 
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to