Reagan never compromised his principles! ---- LMAO!!! Reagan was a liar and an idiot. The Iran-Contra Affair and amnesty for illegals in the USA is proof enough.
On Jan 30, 10:38 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks: Understanding the fix the USA is in will be easier if more of > you can read my highly expert analysis of Barack Obama's and Ronald > Reagan's handwriting. Please talk about what I'm saying. For too > long, people in this country have been letting the media crooks do > most of the talking. > > 8/05/08 > > Dear Tom: No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan > and Barack Obama! If you haven’t read, I am a lifelong graphologist— > one of, if not the best analyzers of handwriting in the entire World! > Ronald Reagan’s handwriting shows someone with a nervous temperament. > But that’s not a “losing it” nervous temperament like John McCain > has. Reagan was a conventional thinking man; i.e., his value system > was like that of most good people. His personality showed that he was > responding to pressures from various fronts, but he could bend rather > than break. What that means is: Reagan never compromised his > principles! Those who show a legible, normal-sized and formed > writing, that also have a nervous but controlled temperament, are salt- > of-the-Earth people! > Reagan’s letter forms were legible, but not fussily exact. That > means that he was practical-minded and not overly concerned with > details. Writers like that are like the majority of good executives: > They can delegate authority, and are trusting enough to leave the > ‘petty details’ to subordinates. Reagan’s signature and the body of > his texts were similar and conventional. His letter forms were > consistently rounded and easy-flowing. So, I know that he was > friendly and well liked. The latter was the primary social trait of > Reagan, which was evident in his smile, humor, easy body language, and > gestures. Those things caused Reagan to inspire trust and confidence! > On the personal side, Reagan was lonely. That fact is indicated > by the above average space between his words. He’d speak his mind, > then leave people alone to do the work required. His relationship > with his family was more detached than he wanted. He had simple, non- > materialistic ideals. The achieving of worthy goals meant more to him > than riches. And those were off-the-table if there were family > pressures. The goals came first, the family second. He was a > trusting parent—not an overly doting one. To him, hard knocks helped > build strong character. Sometimes that was tough-love, but it was > love! > > Barack Obama is as artificial and unconventional as his biracial > parentage tells. From birth, he had identity issues that are ruling > him to this day. He has an almost schizophrenia-like way of bottling- > up his emotions. As a kid, he learned to keep his true feelings to > himself. That’s why he never developed the facial expressions and > body language of a normal person. Such a lack was the first abnormal > thing I noticed about him when he addressed the 2004 Democratic > Convention. > Obama’s inferiority complex demanded that he rise above his > heritage. With each little success, his ego swelled—as did his > capital letters. Those with huge egos make very poor executives. > It’s their way or no way. Obama would be a misfit in any group > dynamic such as in the Executive Office. He would keep getting in the > way of even desirable goals. People will resist him, because he is so > cock sure. The ideas of others seem small by comparison. > Yes, Obama has charisma. Basically, that means that he draws > attention to himself because of his bearing and “poise” in public > situations. But the majority of what passes as “poise” with Obama is > his from-birth, personality flaw of not showing appropriate emotions. > Many must be impressed that he doesn’t show nervousness. His control > over his outward emotions is so developed—but is actually pathological— > that he could pass any lie detector test with ease. The man is > emotionally dead. Obama’s dominant ‘tone’ is that of someone who > isn’t happy. He seems to be successful in rallying those who are too > shy to express their own unhappiness. > Obama PRINTS too many of his letters. Even in the body of his > writing he uses printed letters. He makes those forms with such > exactness that he reveals himself to be a pedant and a perfectionist. > Both of those characteristics mean that he has few if any friends. > He’s an individualistic, loner. His best contribution would be to be > left alone to work out the details, but he insists on controlling > every aspect of every activity around him. Obama has the personality > of a dictator and a demagogue, not a “Reagan-like” delegater and > listener. > Most people with unique personalities, whose writing shows flare > that’s lacking in average people, have superior intelligence. But > Obama has excessive deliberateness in his writing. Deliberateness > means artificiality, lack of spontaneity, phoniness, self-centeredness > and being overbearing. It also shows someone who places form above > substance. Because printing is slower than cursive writing, his IQ > isn’t as high as his verbal fluency hints. When Obama must express > his feelings, extemporaneously, he does so in a most broken and > halting matter, and his talking speed is much too slow! Some view > that as his being “really affected” by what he is saying. But I view > it as the expressions of someone with such mixed emotions about things > that he must PLAN his words. People who do that are UNTRUSTWORTHY. > That’s why I keep referring to Obama as: THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE. > Those who are too impressed by his poise-under-fire need to realize > that he’s got the selfish ego of the anti Christ. With Obama, > disaster will be omnipresent! > > So, Tom, how is it that someone smart like you, who now lives in > China, has the idea that Obama has a snowball's-chance-in-hell of > improving the World condition? The US Congress—with the majority, > there, having huge egos, too—won’t be swayed by rhetoric. Every day, > rhetoric slides off of their backs like water on ducks. His “I’m > angry-toned” speeches appeal to some would-be voters. But after his > first term bogs down, words won’t be enough. Obama doesn’t have the > LIKABLE personality of a “bridge builder”. He doesn’t have the > character and the “knows the difference between right and wrong” > aptitude to be a respected leader. For the good of the nation, Barack > Obama should never be allowed to “get his picture” on any of our > currency, or on any paintings hung on the Capital walls. The survival > of the World is depending on it! > Your damning characterization of “McCain” are equally true of > Obama. Obama has already addressed those Jewish jerks, live, while > standing in front of that rusting war junk in Israel. In unambiguous > words, Obama promised to “support” Israel (with our military might). > He is being held captive by those &@$#1 Jews, too. But I’m using > every ounce of my being to see to it that NEITHER Obama nor McCain > become President! Electing LIBERTARIANS will send a massage to the > World that we Americans are as fed-up with our government as those in > foreign countries are. My New Constitution will instate—for the first > time in our history—democracy and FAIR PLAY in America! And there > will be swift consequences to any American business not being fair and > respectful to those less fortunate in other lands. By “cleaning-up- > our-own-act”, here, the World will soon know that the USA is its best > friend. > Obama promises ‘changes’… while he is leading us to our doom. > But be it known: “A fair, just and pro democracy NEW CONSTITUTION is > the only ‘change’ that we need!” Pass it on! — NoEinstein — AKA > John A. Armistead, Patriot > > On Jan 29, 11:47 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Dear Readers: > > > It continues to enlighten me how “right-on” many of my previous > > essays, relating to my odyssey to save the USA, have been. Here is > > one which I wrote to counter the LIE that Tim Russert had been an > > admirable public figure: > > > 6/24/08 > > > TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT’S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA. > > > Many would suppose that it is… the ‘American way’ to advance from a > > lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the ‘most watched’ > > leaders of the media. But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as > > they come. Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on > > the ‘weaknesses’ of his many guests. And he sometimes punctuated > > those attacks with looks of cynicism. But, getting good Nelson > > Ratings shouldn’t be the standard by which any media figure is judged. > > > While Russet’s star was just rising, I had the ‘inside scoop’ on > > felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators. > > Sounds like… ‘news’, doesn’t it? But over several years—while I kept > > trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the- > > core. To wit: The media assumes that so-called ‘public figures’ > > aren’t required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other > > citizens. > > > Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who ‘attacked’ his news > > stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included > > pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5” floppy disks. But > > Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media ‘icons’ whom I > > contacted would even consider that… ‘news’ might come from someone who > > isn’t a celebrity. What gets covered as news in this country must > > pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through. It > > is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the > > top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert > > as anti-American. The tacit role of the media is to inform the > > Citizens. Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
