Folks: The "ritual" mentioned in the original post concerns the "great traditions" of Congress, and the wasted pomp and circumstance of such things as judges and justices wearing robes on the job. It also concerns our must-be-blind acceptance of much that the media throws at us. Barack Obama, and a surprising number of newscasters and guests on "news" shows keep dropping the word... democracy, as if to say: "Isn't everything great, here!" No, everything is not great in the USA. The country is being torn apart, and the majority simply suppose that's the way GAMES between Democrats and Republicans are supposed to be. Most people place more importance on which team will win the Super Bowl than they do learning about some man from SC who has penned and polished a New Constitution that can free our grandchildren from the burdens of excessive government and waste. Of course, that concern will be of little worth if the wacky Muslims succeed in fomenting WW III. By ratifying my New Constitution, radical religions will be squelched, at least in the USA.
I've proposed making 75% across-the-board cuts in government. The interest on the national debt that we are paying to China can be defaulted-on. It is a leftist ploy to suggest that the consequences of going "bankrupt", just on the INTEREST, will have consequences more dire than paying that interest. Right now, the world is at least 50% in a Great Depression. Surviving that, without bowing to the same old socialist, communist promises, will set the stage for the revitalization of the world economy. It is up to each of us to survive the hard times, and that should be outside the realm of responsibility of government of any type. The next time you favor your diversionary sports over the best interests of the country, ask yourselves: "How important will sports be to your grandchildren, if there is no US economy?" The following essay highlights the some of the largely ignored "cancers" in our government, media, and way of life. 10/01/08 POWER TO THE PEOPLE! By a margin of 20 to 1, the People on “Main Street” have rejected the idea that government should bailout failed businesses. Even a partisan Congress should never have tried to “buck” the Will of the People by even putting that bailout of banks up for a vote! Now, Congress is showing its utter hopelessness by trying to write another bailout proposal that ‘might’ can be passed. More than economics is on-the-line, here. The future of Congress—as presently constituted—is on the line as well. And THAT is the best thing that has ever happened to the USA! Barack Obama, the Anti-Christ of the Human Race, continues to drive straight ahead in his determination to bring this country down. Using ‘his’ new slogan—which he plagiarized from me: “Change We Need”—Obama continues to snow naïve mentalities with his VOMIT of details on everything, including the kitchen sink. Obama is the darling of liberal, news commentary shows. When asked a simple question, he goes into these unending, monotone, diatribes. His idea of appropriate communication is too keep talking long enough, so that no one will be able to recall what the last question, or point, was, which had been stated by anyone but him. If Obama ever becomes President (God forbid…), he will try to be an executive (Ha!) by “getting a group of people together in a room.” Obama claims that he is “good” at getting such a group to come to a consensus. But nothing could be further from the truth! What Obama does before any group, is to express his own ideas in such boring detail, that those in the group will “agree” with that idiot, just to get him to SHUT his mouth up! But Obama likes to claim that a “consensus”, so reached, is proof that he is qualified to be our country’s Chief Executive. An inveterate, successful executive listens 90 percent of the time and talks 10 percent of the time. Apparently, such basic business management wasn’t taught to Obama in his… “community organizer” classes. And none of his Band of Crooks will dare to burst his bubble by telling him that he simply talks too much. If Barack Obama is so SURE that he can produce the ‘Change We Need’, he should be given such opportunity BEFORE the election. Instead of gallivanting from state to state to make diatribe speeches, with his sleeves rolled up, and his… red, white and BLACK flags in tow, Obama should be give one week to BE President! During such time he would be allowed to make any speeches, before any committees of Congress, and to address the American People, with all of the persuasiveness that he believes that he has—but which not a single soul in the USA will be moved by. If Obama could be given such an opportunity, as above, he would realize how totally futile it is to have his Black Ass be elected president. The racial issue, here, isn’t the ‘color’ of his ass, it’s that such ‘color’ has aligned a non-thinking, lock-step, criminal- sympathizing and democracy-threatening, Black BLOCK vote—which, even now, is jeopardizing not just the USA, but the survival of the entire Human Race. For the past year I’ve been urging the American People to realize that governments—local, state, and federal—are screwed up. Mainly, the latter is so, because of the unjustified influences of unconstitutional, political parties. However, in one-fell-swoop, the American People can correct all of the evolved deficiencies in government, simply by adapting my New Constitution in 2010. But if Obama gets elected… I will lock up such document and never let it see the light-of-day. I’ll keep my options opened, however, if the American People will simply vote McCain-Palin into office. Today, I heard Bob Barr, Libertarian Party presidential candidate, comment that the partisan bickering over the economy is increasing his prospects of becoming President. Folks, Bob Barr is so easy to please, that he rejoices when some polls show him with 6% of the vote. Most will agree that it’ll take a vote larger than that to change the outcome of the race. Though Libertarians have the right ideas, they simply haven’t stepped-up-to-the-plate to knock the props out from under the failed institutions in this country. The news media is #1, followed by government, #2, followed by education, #3. Those failed institutions share the total blame for bringing down America. But if the American People can “be open” to adapting my New Constitution, the hopefulness of that attitude will immediately begin causing most positive things to happen in the USA and in the world! For one thing: The chances of there being any more 9/11 type threats to this country will go DOWN. Few of McCain’s “Muslim extremists” will be rushing to kill themselves, if the “attitude changes” that Muslims seek will be forthcoming. The majority of the American People don’t think that the USA should be… the police force of the world. Being such, is simply too expensive. And it is usually inconsiderate to one or more other nations. Because of media bias, Jews have gotten control of our failed system of government. Things must be “agreeable” to Jews, or Congress is afraid of getting bad press. *** Congress is a failure, because there are simply too many special interests which must sanction what gets done. *** My New Constitution will boot out all special interests— including the tacit ones—with threats of jail time! If Obama becomes President, Blacks will become another “Jew level” negative influence in Washington. But more than that, Blacks will both instigate rioting, and be on the receiving end of violence—the likes of which this country has never seen. Having such… social unrest —or even a sibilance thereof—happen during tough economic times, and with a failed government screwing up more and more of what is going on, doesn’t bode well for our future as a nation. Those 20 people (to 1) on ‘main street’ not favoring any bailouts of Wall Street, should realize the POWER that such unity manifests! Our strength as a nation can be in our unity; and no one should fear that ‘main street’ won’t do what is best for the country as a whole. The hopelessly corrupt news media, and government, will be shaken to their very foundations if, say, Sara Palin—in her debate, or on the campaign trail—will comment: “… You know, this country has some serious problems. And it seems that government is a big part of it. How can serious problems be solved, if the government that is trying to do the solving, needs to be fixed? Someone has said: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” But government is clearly broken. 90% of the American People who have been polled say that it is. That’s why I’m open-to-the-Idea of letting the American People vote on a New Constitution.” Over-the-hill news anchor, Katie Couric, has taken pot shots at Palin regarding her sources of knowledge on international affairs. Couric’s motive was to pigeon-hole Palin as being narrowly informed. But rather than going there, Palin, wisely, answered in a general way: that she gets information from many sources. Somehow, those in the news have the mistaken notion that they are prosecuting attorneys. They must try to seek-and-destroy, as though doing so will elevate their own questionable status. Before Katie Couric left the ’Today’ show, she and Matt Lauer took on the project of re designing the dressing room of their co-host. Lauer did a credible job. But Couric took everything as a big joke. She had a wall-sized picture of her own MUG put on his wall. How “funny”… but how ‘indicative’ it is that we, as a nation, have let those with the biggest egos—like Katie Couric and Barack Obama—try to tell us how we should perceive the little news that we are allowed to hear. CNN’s Anderson Coo-per, with his, the-world-is-coming-to-an-end, Botox face, has implied that Palin wasn’t smart enough to name a newspaper or other source for her facts. But realize this: Any mother, like Palin, with a son who will, perhaps, be going-into-harm’s-way, tends to keep informed about world events. Barack Obama keeps implying, with his boring harangues, that our President must be a cornucopia of knowledge to handle the job. In fact, the only REAL qualification needed in our President is that he or she have a functioning value system—or… knows the difference between right and wrong. If Sara Palin becomes President one day—as I sincerely hope—I’ll sleep well knowing that a “Hockey Mom” cares too much about her own family, and those of her friends and acquaintances everywhere, to do anything that’s not in the best interest of the USA. And because Palin is a fast learner, I’ll bet that she will outpace Barack Obama in getting the… on-the-job training, that the USA can’t afford to let that son-of- a-bitch, Barack Obama, have! Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!” Pass it on! Respectfully submitted, — NoEinstein — Happy Days… ! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9903367481ce7970/ae4338645fbefbf5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=Happy+Days...!#ae4338645fbefbf5 10/01/08 > On Jan 30, 11:38 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks: Understanding the fix the USA is in will be easier if more of > you can read my highly expert analysis of Barack Obama's and Ronald > Reagan's handwriting. Please talk about what I'm saying. For too > long, people in this country have been letting the media crooks do > most of the talking. > > 8/05/08 > > Dear Tom: No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan > and Barack Obama! If you haven’t read, I am a lifelong graphologist— > one of, if not the best analyzers of handwriting in the entire World! > Ronald Reagan’s handwriting shows someone with a nervous temperament. > But that’s not a “losing it” nervous temperament like John McCain > has. Reagan was a conventional thinking man; i.e., his value system > was like that of most good people. His personality showed that he was > responding to pressures from various fronts, but he could bend rather > than break. What that means is: Reagan never compromised his > principles! Those who show a legible, normal-sized and formed > writing, that also have a nervous but controlled temperament, are salt- > of-the-Earth people! > Reagan’s letter forms were legible, but not fussily exact. That > means that he was practical-minded and not overly concerned with > details. Writers like that are like the majority of good executives: > They can delegate authority, and are trusting enough to leave the > ‘petty details’ to subordinates. Reagan’s signature and the body of > his texts were similar and conventional. His letter forms were > consistently rounded and easy-flowing. So, I know that he was > friendly and well liked. The latter was the primary social trait of > Reagan, which was evident in his smile, humor, easy body language, and > gestures. Those things caused Reagan to inspire trust and confidence! > On the personal side, Reagan was lonely. That fact is indicated > by the above average space between his words. He’d speak his mind, > then leave people alone to do the work required. His relationship > with his family was more detached than he wanted. He had simple, non- > materialistic ideals. The achieving of worthy goals meant more to him > than riches. And those were off-the-table if there were family > pressures. The goals came first, the family second. He was a > trusting parent—not an overly doting one. To him, hard knocks helped > build strong character. Sometimes that was tough-love, but it was > love! > > Barack Obama is as artificial and unconventional as his biracial > parentage tells. From birth, he had identity issues that are ruling > him to this day. He has an almost schizophrenia-like way of bottling- > up his emotions. As a kid, he learned to keep his true feelings to > himself. That’s why he never developed the facial expressions and > body language of a normal person. Such a lack was the first abnormal > thing I noticed about him when he addressed the 2004 Democratic > Convention. > Obama’s inferiority complex demanded that he rise above his > heritage. With each little success, his ego swelled—as did his > capital letters. Those with huge egos make very poor executives. > It’s their way or no way. Obama would be a misfit in any group > dynamic such as in the Executive Office. He would keep getting in the > way of even desirable goals. People will resist him, because he is so > cock sure. The ideas of others seem small by comparison. > Yes, Obama has charisma. Basically, that means that he draws > attention to himself because of his bearing and “poise” in public > situations. But the majority of what passes as “poise” with Obama is > his from-birth, personality flaw of not showing appropriate emotions. > Many must be impressed that he doesn’t show nervousness. His control > over his outward emotions is so developed—but is actually pathological— > that he could pass any lie detector test with ease. The man is > emotionally dead. Obama’s dominant ‘tone’ is that of someone who > isn’t happy. He seems to be successful in rallying those who are too > shy to express their own unhappiness. > Obama PRINTS too many of his letters. Even in the body of his > writing he uses printed letters. He makes those forms with such > exactness that he reveals himself to be a pedant and a perfectionist. > Both of those characteristics mean that he has few if any friends. > He’s an individualistic, loner. His best contribution would be to be > left alone to work out the details, but he insists on controlling > every aspect of every activity around him. Obama has the personality > of a dictator and a demagogue, not a “Reagan-like” delegater and > listener. > Most people with unique personalities, whose writing shows flare > that’s lacking in average people, have superior intelligence. But > Obama has excessive deliberateness in his writing. Deliberateness > means artificiality, lack of spontaneity, phoniness, self-centeredness > and being overbearing. It also shows someone who places form above > substance. Because printing is slower than cursive writing, his IQ > isn’t as high as his verbal fluency hints. When Obama must express > his feelings, extemporaneously, he does so in a most broken and > halting matter, and his talking speed is much too slow! Some view > that as his being “really affected” by what he is saying. But I view > it as the expressions of someone with such mixed emotions about things > that he must PLAN his words. People who do that are UNTRUSTWORTHY. > That’s why I keep referring to Obama as: THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE. > Those who are too impressed by his poise-under-fire need to realize > that he’s got the selfish ego of the anti Christ. With Obama, > disaster will be omnipresent! > > So, Tom, how is it that someone smart like you, who now lives in > China, has the idea that Obama has a snowball's-chance-in-hell of > improving the World condition? The US Congress—with the majority, > there, having huge egos, too—won’t be swayed by rhetoric. Every day, > rhetoric slides off of their backs like water on ducks. His “I’m > angry-toned” speeches appeal to some would-be voters. But after his > first term bogs down, words won’t be enough. Obama doesn’t have the > LIKABLE personality of a “bridge builder”. He doesn’t have the > character and the “knows the difference between right and wrong” > aptitude to be a respected leader. For the good of the nation, Barack > Obama should never be allowed to “get his picture” on any of our > currency, or on any paintings hung on the Capital walls. The survival > of the World is depending on it! > Your damning characterization of “McCain” are equally true of > Obama. Obama has already addressed those Jewish jerks, live, while > standing in front of that rusting war junk in Israel. In unambiguous > words, Obama promised to “support” Israel (with our military might). > He is being held captive by those &@$#1 Jews, too. But I’m using > every ounce of my being to see to it that NEITHER Obama nor McCain > become President! Electing LIBERTARIANS will send a massage to the > World that we Americans are as fed-up with our government as those in > foreign countries are. My New Constitution will instate—for the first > time in our history—democracy and FAIR PLAY in America! And there > will be swift consequences to any American business not being fair and > respectful to those less fortunate in other lands. By “cleaning-up- > our-own-act”, here, the World will soon know that the USA is its best > friend. > Obama promises ‘changes’… while he is leading us to our doom. > But be it known: “A fair, just and pro democracy NEW CONSTITUTION is > the only ‘change’ that we need!” Pass it on! — NoEinstein — AKA > John A. Armistead, Patriot > > On Jan 29, 11:47 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Readers: > > > It continues to enlighten me how “right-on” many of my previous > > essays, relating to my odyssey to save the USA, have been. Here is > > one which I wrote to counter the LIE that Tim Russert had been an > > admirable public figure: > > > 6/24/08 > > > TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT’S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA. > > > Many would suppose that it is… the ‘American way’ to advance from a > > lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the ‘most watched’ > > leaders of the media. But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as > > they come. Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on > > the ‘weaknesses’ of his many guests. And he sometimes punctuated > > those attacks with looks of cynicism. But, getting good Nelson > > Ratings shouldn’t be the standard by which any media figure is judged. > > > While Russet’s star was just rising, I had the ‘inside scoop’ on > > felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators. > > Sounds like… ‘news’, doesn’t it? But over several years—while I kept > > trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the- > > core. To wit: The media assumes that so-called ‘public figures’ > > aren’t required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other > > citizens. > > > Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who ‘attacked’ his news > > stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included > > pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5” floppy disks. But > > Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media ‘icons’ whom I > > contacted would even consider that… ‘news’ might come from someone who > > isn’t a celebrity. What gets covered as news in this country must > > pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through. It > > is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the > > top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert > > as anti-American. The tacit role of the media is to inform the > > Citizens. Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
