Boobus Americanus is CONDITIONED to believe that whenever the
State 'shows' up to 'investigate' or 'prosecute' that they would not
be there were there not some 'wrongdoing' in the first place.
Pull Peddlers get away with using such tactics all the time.
You are correct that it does not have any legitimate authority
provided it by the Constitution but it does so regularly through
regulation, tax codes, etc.
Regard$,
--MJ
Sir, I am convinced that it would be impolitic, as well as unjust, to aggravate the burdens of the people, for the purpose of favoring the manufacturers; for this government created and gave power to Congress, to regulate commerce and equalize duties on the whole of the United States, and not to lay a duty but with a steady eye to revenue. With my good will, sir, there should be none but an ad valorem duty on all articles, which would prevent the possibility of one interest in the country being sacrificed, by the management of taxation, to another. -- John Randolph
At 12:04 PM 2/10/2011, you wrote:
Thats a good way to lose an election.--
Bottom line is the fed (or state) doesn't have the power to tell
private enterprises how to spend its profits.
On Feb 10, 10:52 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> They send the IRS or other alphabet soup agencies to wreak havoc,
> cost dollars and ultimately destroy the business and life of the owner.
>
> Read the FTC vs. FTC piece provided.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> ... the State claims and exercises the monopoly of crime ... It
> forbids private murder, but itself organizes murder on a colossal
> scale. It punishes private theft, but itself lays unscrupulous hands
> on anything it wants, whether the property of citizen or of alien.
> -- Albert Jay Nock, _On Doing the Right Thing, and Other Essays_ (1928).
>
> At 10:43 AM 2/10/2011, you wrote:
>
>
>
> >He can't force them.
>
> >Picture yourself owning a hair dressing shop that made a profit last
> >year. Now the fed shows up and tells you you have to hire another
> >person, or else.
>
> >Or else what?
>
> >On Feb 9, 4:43 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 8, 3:37 pm, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Its more than semantics. unless you can show me where the gubmint has
> > > > to power to tell them what they "have to" do with their profits.
>
> > > > I can't find it.
>
> > > Then wait to find out how he forces them, because you can't find that
> > > either.
>
> >--
> >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
