*The Patriot Act, Fox News, the TSA and Feeling Less Free*
1 June 2011 by Szandor Blestman
The Patriot Act, in my opinion, has been one of the most egregious,
liberty violating acts that has ever been passed by congress. It was a
knee jerk reaction to the 9/11 attacks. It is so huge and was passed so
quickly after that event that any thinking person must realize it had to
be written well before the attacks took place, was waiting for just such
an attack so it could be introduced, and could not have possibly been
read and its implications understood by anyone who voted for it. I doubt
very much that any congress critter has yet to read it in its entirety.
Here it is almost ten years later and it still sullies the political
landscape of this once great republic.
It seems that most common folk don't fully understand what the Patriot
Act truly is. If the polls are to be believed (I personally don't trust
most polls) then they seem to think that the Patriot Act has somehow
made our nation more secure. They seem to believe the propaganda that is
spewed forth from corporate establishment media giants that the Patriot
Act has done its job and protected us. Yet it wasn't the Patriot Act
that stopped the shoe bomber or the underwear bomber, it was the
passengers themselves. And every time a plot is reported foiled, it is
later determined that the plot only occurred because some federal
security agency or another helped it along. So one might wonder, if the
Patriot Act has been doing its job, will they finally get rid of it if
it fails and another terrorist event occurs? I doubt that very much.
That's too much like hoping that once Osama Bin Laden is finally and
officially killed in some special forces raid that the wars of
occupation will end and our troops will come home.
Recently, three of the most soviet like, Big Brother type provisions of
the Patriot Act were set to expire. Congress didn't want to deal with
them earlier in the year, likely because they were worried about
backlash. The Senate did what they so often do, put off the vote until
the last minute and then rushed the legislation through without proper
debate because they don't want the legislation scrutinized. They passed
a four year extension on this monstrosity complete with its most
controversial provisions because, in my humble opinion, they don't want
to give up power and they'd love to be able to arrest their political
adversaries should push come to shove.
Rand Paul, the freshman senator from Kentucky, was the only one who
stood up to this abuse of power. He was the only one who questioned the
power of the party leadership, on both sides of the aisle. He merely
asked for a debate on introducing amendments meant to protect freedoms
we as Americans are supposed to enjoy. For all his efforts he was
excoriated by the establishment for not following like a sheep instead
of applauded for his stand and his most American individualist ideals.
Now, I'm not one to watch corporate television news programs, but I came
across a Fox program with a bunch of talking heads discussing this
issue. I was appalled to hear them more or less condoning a police state
in our nation. They are taking a thousand years of struggle against
authoritarianism and throwing it away, defending a doctrine that allows
government agents to spy on people going about their daily business
without just cause. They are defending a doctrine that claims everyone
is guilty until they can prove themselves innocent. It was this kind of
tyranny that the founding fathers fought against. This kind of tyranny
led to the writing of the Declaration of Independence. This kind of
tyranny was the reason they included the Bill of Rights in the
constitution. The Patriot Act is as un-American, fascist, soviet-esque
and unpatriotic as it gets. It violates the natural rights of
individuals in almost every way they can be violated and yet these men
continue to support it without so much as batting an eye, and then they
call Rand Paul extreme. To them, the senator from Kentucky is extreme
because he values the principles America was founded upon. One can only
assume they consider all individualists, constitutionalists,
libertarians and anyone who wants a smaller, more accountable federal
government as extreme. To them, an extremist is one who challenges the
supremacy of their corporate masters.
One of the most remarkable statements came from Charles Krauthammer. He
claimed that all those warnings about America becoming a police state
didn't pan out. Has he been living under a rock for the last ten years?
He asked something along the line of is their anyone who thinks their
freedoms have been curtailed? He suggested that he hadn't heard of
anyone who felt that way. Well, I for one feel that way, Mr.
Krauthammer, so now you have heard of someone.
How about all those people who are subjected to naked body scanners at
the airports and TSA gropings? Do you think they might feel a little
less free? I know that I'd like to feel like I could fly places, but I
don't want to subject myself to their intrusions. I seem to recall that
others have even protested against such measures. How could you call
that anything but a police state provision? It is the Patriot Act that
has given us the TSA, and now they're coming out of the airports and are
soon to be seen on a street, in a mall, or at a prom dance near you.
They needed to do more than just debate amendments to the Patriot Act,
they need to repeal the entire bill.
How about the checkpoints that are popping up, especially in border
states? Do you think that the people who have to pass through them feel
less free? Do you think that they might start to have an inkling that
something has gone wrong and this is no longer the free nation it has
been claimed to be? How about all those people who want to drink raw
milk? Do you think they feel less free when the Feds tell them they
can't decide for themselves what to put in their own bodies? How about
the peaceful Amish, do you think they might feel less free when their
farms are raided by SWAT teams for selling the milk others ask for? How
about the dancers at the Jefferson Memorial? Do you think they might
feel a little less free as they were handcuffed for prancing around a
little or gently swaying in place? These are things that have all been
normalized because of the Patriot Act and similar legislation. It is the
federal government that has become extreme. It is they who are cracking
down on peaceful individuals and restricting normal human activity they
should have no business even caring about.
Do you like the fact that FBI agents can now write their own warrants
without having to so much as show a judge probable cause, just like the
king's men were able to do in the 1700s? Do you like the fact that they
can break into anyone's home they want when no one's home and steal
whatever they wish without a warrant, simply on a suspicion, and not
have to be accountable to anyone? Do you think it's ok that they can
proclaim someone an enemy combatant at anytime they wish and hold them
indefinitely without a trial? Do you believe that I'm a little extreme
for mentioning such provisions and that your government would never do
such things? The Patriot Act grants government agents the legal
authority to take such actions, and when someone has such power it is
only a matter of time before that power is abused and some innocent
individuals suffer because of that abuse. Besides, just because you may
not have heard about such things happening doesn't mean such events
haven't already occurred. You certainly can't count on the corporate
media to inform you of such abuses when they do happen.
There are plenty of people that feel their freedoms have been curtailed.
There are plenty of people who feel less safe because of government
intrusion, not more secure. Everyday more and more people become victims
of state agents. Everyday new police brutality videos come out. Everyday
stories of the police state grow more and more egregious. Everyday the
politicians show us they don't give a damn about individual rights and
care only about their own power. Everyday the corporate media shows its
true colors by defending collectivist doctrine and the agenda of the
power elite. I believe, however, that one day enough people will finally
be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back. On that day, it
will be remembered who supported natural individual rights and who
fought for the authoritarian collectivist agenda.
http://fr33agents.net/2011/06/01/the-patriot-act-fox-news-the-tsa-and-feeling-less-free/
--
Freedom is always illegal!
When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
have any possibility of being free.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
