(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in > military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the > United States.
I am quite sure that it does not say that they may NOT hold a US citizen under this rule, Keith. What makes you think they won't if given half a chance?? On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Constitutional.Reset < [email protected]> wrote: > No. You missed it. Notice the word 'requirement'. That leaves > 'option to' - though by the statute instituted in perpetrated felony > and instituted NOT pursuant to our Constitution. I hope that was an > honest mistake on your part as the alternative leaves you with issues > that are God's business to remedy. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
