This is a machine translation.. I don't have time to do it myself..... The adoption of laws that promote homosexuality is a severe setback in our society made up the core of the family... The gay lobby not struggle for "human rights" fighting for public acceptance of sexual behavior that is socially rejected, and the victimizarse strategy used to achieve such acceptance. The reality is that "homosexuals" enjoy all fundamental human rights (freedom of expression, access to health, education, decent work, etc.), their rights are guaranteed by our Constitution, our State does not discriminate and the "cohabitation societies law" what he wants is an extension of civil rights for a group of people with a certain unusual sexual behavior; What they do not enjoy (or enjoy) is acceptance of publishes for its conduct. What the gay lobby seeks not are "human rights", it is imposing the model of "diverse sexuality" (homosexualizar) to children and to the Costa Rican youth. The "cohabitation societies law" is not another thing that "homosexual marriage" to the clear detriment of the family; Social insurance, the labour code, the family code and our model of State are in function of defending the family into which form the future citizens. "Homosexuality" is indefensible from any point (biological, social, theological, etc.)... In Western society no one is convicted criminally be "gay"... Homosexuality is not an ideology, it is not a race, not a social class, summary are not a marginalized group that has to defend... Homosexuality is an unusual sexual behavior practiced by a group of people (according to numerous studies and articles not representing or 3% of the populations of countries in first world), if it is always been present in societies human and it is undeniable... The issue is that you like unusual behavior, it is practiced in the personal and private level (to the end of the day each who is responsible for their own physical and spiritual health)... never before in the history of mankind had intended to "homosexualizar" society, the State not incumbent legislation to give legal status to the preferred sex of an individualsexual preferences remain in an area deprived of every citizen; It is so ironic as if we will try to create laws for all groups of people with some particular conduct... On the other hand this seriously attentive behaviour against public health, something which does not say the gay lobby is the rate of sexually transmitted diseases afflicting the population "gay" and they say no because it does not suit their interests and would generate them a widespread rejection of Governments and of public opinion, only in the case of HIV, the gay population has a greater percentage (corroborated by many items, including here the CCSS made one last year) that the women's worker sexual, statistically is many times less likely to get HIV in a casual relationship with a sex worker who with a "gay". "Homophobia" is a myth, the real discrimination against homosexuals do not exist, given that, as already mentioned before, enjoy all the fundamental rights as any citizen, intolerance occurs when systematically attacks without arguments to an individual or to a group... However reject conduct against morals, of the family and take a position against intolerance is not... Those who defend the family, not ofend the dignity of any "gay", descalificamos behaviour in them specifically, but their value as human beings... The firm values defense is not "homophobia" or intolerance, is reason. (Translated by Bing )
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
