http://www.wnd.com/2004/11/27300/****

[image: WND.com]****
Kerry's non-honorable discharge****

Published: 11/01/2004 at 1:00 AM ****

There is overwhelming evidence that the Navy gave John Kerry either a
dishonorable discharge or an undesirable discharge – which is the
equivalent of a dishonorable discharge without the felony conviction – and
that, as a result of such discharge, he was stripped of all of his famous
but questionable Navy awards and medals. And the kicker? The evidence is on
his website! ****

Kerry’s oh-so-clever handlers evidently depended on the ignorance of the
public and the press about military records when they posted his 1978
“Honorable Discharge from the Reserves” on his site as part of a carefully
selected partial release of his Navy records (the Navy says it is still
withholding about 100 records). However, one diligent researcher, Thomas
Lipscomb, saw through the scam and exposed it in a New York Sun story on
Oct. 13. Predictably, the major media has shunned the story.****

What Mr. Lipscomb noticed (and I overlooked when I first read the document)
was the date of the posted discharge, Feb. 16, 1978. This was six years
after Kerry’s six-year (1966-1972) commitment to the Navy ended. The
anti-war detractor of our military did not re-up for another six-year term
in 1972, so why the delay of his discharge? The only logical conclusion is
that the 1978 honorable discharge was a second discharge given to replace
an earlier undesirable discharge under less-than-honorable conditions, as
unfit for military service. ****

I was a colonel assigned as director of Operations of Headquarters, Texas
Air National Guard when George W. Bush was a lieutenant in the Air Guard.
Since 1999, I have been besieged by the media, from the London Guardian to
CBS’ “60 Minutes,” NBC, the Boston Globe and others, with allegations and
questions about Lt. Bush’s service in and discharge from the Texas Air
National Guard and U.S. Air Force. I recently appeared on “Fox & Friends”
twice to shoot down CBS’ phony memos about Lt. Bush and allegations about
his discharge. In the interest of fairness and equal time, it is time
scrutiny of John Kerry’s discharge(s) is demanded. ****

The Navy is stonewalling Freedom Of Information Act requests by Judicial
Watch for the rest of Kerry’s records – not surprising, because ever since
the Tailhook flap, the Navy has had a politically correct virus. Feminist
Rep. Patricia Schroeder, D-Colo., figuratively castrated the Navy’s top
brass, and the Navy cringed from political correctness. Pressure and morale
at the top was so low that the chief of Naval Operations committed suicide.
The Navy doesn’t want to admit it succumbed to political pressure to
restore honors stripped from a discredited turncoat. In hiding the truth,
the Navy dishonors even the lowest-ranking sailor who ever swabbed a deck. *
***

Sen. Kerry has said that his medal certificates were reissued because he
lost them (and his dog ate his homework, I suppose). Rewards are certified
in one’s permanent personnel record jacket. If you lose a medal, you can
get a replacement medal if your records show the award. The only way awards
would have to be reissued is if they were rescinded and deleted from your
records. And this narrows the possibilities down to a dishonorable
discharge or an undesirable discharge. As Mr. Lipscomb noted:****

*There is one odd coincidence that gives some weight to the possibility
that Mr. Kerry was dishonorably discharged … when a dishonorable discharge
is issued, all pay benefits and allowances, and all medals and honors are
revoked as well. And five months after Mr. Kerry joined the U.S. Senate in
1985, on one single day, June 4, all of Mr. Kerry’s medals were reissued.***
**

Military sources tell me that an undesirable discharge under
other-than-honorable conditions would also result in a loss of benefits and
awards. Kerry could have received a dishonorable discharge, but that would
have required a court martial and a felony conviction that might be harder
to conceal, so the undesirable discharge is more likely. ****

The experience of my 30-plus years in the Navy, U.S. Air Force, and Air
National Guard tells me that the late-issued honorable discharge was
obviously a cover-up whitewash. Ditto for the re-issuance of Kerry’s medals
shortly after he became a member of the “ol’ boys club” in the Senate. ****

One of the top dogs in that club, Sen. John Warner, has amnesia about “any
representation” about Kerry receiving a less than honorable discharge, even
though he was Nixon’s secretary of the Navy when Kerry delivered his
diatribe against the Navy and other services in the Senate in April, 1971.
In May of 1970, Kerry conferred with the Viet Cong in Paris, and in July of
1971, he demonstrated in Washington to sell their peace proposal – while he
was in the Naval Reserve. This variety of amnesia is common among
Republicans asked to stand up and testify to Democrat crimes and injustices.
****

The Nixon-Ford presidency gave way to Democrat President Jimmy Carter in
1977, which tends to explain the six-year delay in getting the revised
discharge. Mr. Lipscomb adds some insight:****

*Mr. Carter’s first act as president was a general amnesty for draft
dodgers and other war protesters. Less than an hour after his inauguration
on Jan. 21, 1977, while still in the Capitol building, Mr. Carter signed
Executive Order 4483 empowering it. By the time it became a directive from
the Defense Department in March 1977, it had been expanded to include other
offenders who may have had general, bad conduct, dishonorable discharges,
and any other discharge or sentence with negative effect on military
records. In those cases, the directive outlined a procedure for appeal on a
case-by-case basis before a board of officers. A satisfactory appeal would
result in an improvement of discharge status or an honorable discharge.*****

A document on Kerry’s
website<http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Honorable_Discharge_From_Reserve.pdf>is
a form letter from W. Graham Claytor, Carter’s secretary of the Navy,
which grants his Honorable Discharge.****

Secretary Claytor’s letter says that this action to award an Honorable
Discharge Certificate is taken in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code,
Sections 1162 and 1163, which deal with grounds for involuntary separation
of a reserve officer and provide for the action of “a board of officers” to
examine an officer’s records and review previous actions. Obviously, this
was the aforementioned board for appeal resulting from President Carter’s
executive order. Unless Lt. Kerry had previously received an undesirable
discharge, he had nothing to appeal and would not have come before this
board. ****

When he became a senator in 1985, his clout as a senator got his medals
back, even though Reagan was president, but the restoration of the medals
was one more piece of evidence, as Mr. Lipscomb noted, that Kerry’s
previous discharge was not honorable. ****

A man who evidently has been found unfit for military service could become
commander in chief of the armed forces. It is time for the facts hidden in
his records to be disclosed. ****
------------------------------

*Earl Lively is a former colonel who was assigned as director of Operations
of Headquarters, Texas Air National Guard when George W. Bush was a
lieutenant in the Air Guard.*****

** **

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to