"sacred" ...... demonized
---
religious myth to ignore.

On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 6:07:41 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
> August 13, 2013 ****
> Democrats' images are sacred while Republicans' are demonized****
>
> Ethel C. Fenig****
>
> ** **
>
> The double standard, the hypocrisy over treatment of Democrats and 
> Republicans, with a touch of racism and sexism thrown in, is clearly 
> playing out in different attitudes towards images of Democrats and 
> Republicans.
>
> While liberal heads are 
> exploding<http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/08/obama_face_on_rodeo_clown_causes_liberal_heads_to_explode.html%20>about
>  a President Barack Obama (D) clown mask at the Missouri State Fair, 
> liberal heads were relatively intact--as were, alas, Republican heads--19 
> years ago when a private rodeo allowed bulls to charge a President George 
> H. W. Bush (R) mannequin near Philadelphia, The Gateway 
> Pundit<http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/08/flashback-liberals-were-silent-when-george-bush-dummies-were-used-at-rodeos/>reminds
>  us.
> ****
>
> *Back in 1994,* the cowboys used George Bush dummies at the Woodstown, 
> Pennsylvania rodeo.
> For some reason, the liberals didn't seem to mind this too much.****
>
> Philly.com<http://articles.philly.com/1994-08-19/news/25842089_1_bullfighting-clowns-rodeo-arena-clown-smile>reported:
> ****
>
> "The big white gate flew open. The bull came out bucking. The rider 
> flopped from side to side and the bullfighters held back, letting the bull 
> make his moves until the rider dropped off. Licciardello crouched in a 
> heavily padded barrel, a human target should the bull decide to charge. 
> Hawkins waited near the barrel, holding his big inner tube. *A dummy with 
> a George Bush mask stood beside the clown, propped up by a broomstick.*
> "...****
>
> Of course, at the time, our first black president, Bill 
> I-did-not-have-sex-with-that-woman Clinton (D) was in charge so no one 
> complained. ****
>
> Last year on the popular (for some) HBO Game of Thrones series, a muddy, 
> severed likeness of President George W. Bush's (R) head, propped on a 
> stick, appeared in several early episodes. It was later removed. ****
>
> According to Patrick Kevin Day of the Los Angeles Times 
> <http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/14/entertainment/la-et-st-game-thrones-george-w-bush-head-20120614>
> ****
>
> "George Bush's head appears in a couple of beheading scenes," the duo 
> revealed in their commentary. "It's not a choice, it's not a political 
> statement. We just had to use whatever heads we had lying around."****
>
> Ri-i-ght! And Bush's head--not Clinton's or Obama's--was conveniently 
> lying around because...?****
>
> HBO and Benioff and Weiss issued statements of apology.****
>
> Benioff and Weiss explained, "We use a lot of prosthetic body parts on the 
> show: heads, arms, etc. We can't afford to have these all made from 
> scratch, especially in scenes where we need a lot of them, so we rent them 
> in bulk. After the scene was already shot, someone pointed out that one of 
> the heads looked like George W. Bush.****
>
> Right again. HBO and the Game of Thrones production staff are so poverty 
> stricken that "We can't afford to have these all made from scratch..." ***
> *
>
> "In the DVD commentary, we mentioned this, though we should not have. We 
> meant no disrespect to the former president and apologize if anything we 
> said or did suggested otherwise."****
>
> HBO added, "We were deeply dismayed to see this and find it unacceptable, 
> disrespectful and in very bad taste. We made this clear to the executive 
> producers of the series who apologized immediately for this inadvertent 
> careless mistake. We are sorry this happened and will have it removed from 
> any future DVD production."****
>
> But don't feel too sorry for HBO and Game of Thrones personnel though. The 
> early DVDs with the Bush head might be very valuable "to super-fans, as the 
> version of the 'Game of Thrones' DVD set available looks to be a 
> collector's item soon."
>
> But Democrat heads, or other images, are still sacred. Republicans'? Not 
> so much. Even the women's.
>
> The Hillary Project, <http://thehillaryproject.com/> a group opposed to 
> Hillary Rodham (now using Clinton (D), has an online game in which her face 
> is figuratively slapped. Oooh! House Minority Leader Representative Nancy 
> Pelosi (D-CA) doesn't like that according to Brietbart's Tony 
> Lee<http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/%20http:/www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/08/12/Pelosi-Dems-Outraged-By-Slap-Hillary-Site-Silent-on-Vile-Slap-Palin-Game-that-Depicts-Her-Naked>.
>  
> ****
>
> 'Slap Hillary' site isn't a game, it isn't funny. Like all violence 
> against women, it's sick. GOP needs to grow up and take this site down," 
> Pelosi tweeted.****
>
> As BizPacReview 
> notes<http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/08/11/pelosi-feigns-outrage-over-slap-hillary-game-slap-palin-okay-81399>,
>  
> however, Pelosi has never had a similar complaint about a similar "Slap 
> Palin" game. That site also has a "photoshopped image of Palin naked, 
> having sex with former running mate John McCain."****
>
> "Pelosi and her fellow travelers on the left don't denounce games like 
> 'Slap Hillary' because they're 'sick' like 'all violence against women,'" 
> BizPacReview wrote. "They denounce them because they don't like their 
> politics."****
>
> BizPacReview observes that Democrats who claim to champion women and 
> accuse Republicans of waging a "war on women" often do not have a problem 
> when female conservatives are degraded or encouraged to be slapped back to 
> Alaska. ****
>
> "They have no problem with the same thing - and worse - being done to a 
> Republican woman in the same virtual context,'" BizPacReview wrote. "In all 
> seriousness, who's really 'sick' here?"****
>
> As mentioned, you don't remember Pelosi's or other liberal objections 
> several years ago to Slap Sarah Palin because there was none? But do you 
> remember Pelosi's objections to mocking Palin's children, especially her 
> Downe's Syndrome youngest? Of course you don't. But don't worry, your 
> memory isn't deteriorating; Pelosi-and the usual liberal gang-- were 
> characteristically silent about the slime thrown against a female who 
> succeeded politically on her own without a wealthy and/or politically 
> connected husband and/or father. 
>
> Oh. That's why the silence. 
>
> And so liberals understand why a young boy 
> prays<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/12/you-are-good-barack-obama-video-shows-little-boy-p/>to
>  his god, Barack Obama, thanking him for his goodness. In their own way 
> they do too. ****
>
> "Barack Obama <http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/barack-obama/>, 
> thank you for doing everything and all the kind stuff. Thank you for all 
> the stuff that you helped us with."****
>
> "Thank you for taking the courage and responsibility for everything you've 
> done for us," the boy continues, adding that God has given the president "a 
> special power."****
>
> "You are good, Barack 
> Obama<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/barack-obama/>. 
> You are great," he concludes, throwing his arms in the arms and screaming, 
> "Barack 
> Obama <http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/barack-obama/>!"****
>
> Hail Obama. ****
>
> ** **
>
>
> *Page Printed from: 
> http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/08/democrats_images_are_sacred_while_republicans_are_demonized.html
> * at August 13, 2013 - 02:47:44 PM CDT****
>  
>
> __._,_.___
>  
>
>
>
>
>     
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to