Thank you! This is very helpful. I'm still trying to figure out what the
good balance between Makefiles and render -p. Some experimenting is in
order.

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:47 PM Joel Dueck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Take a look at one of my recent Pollen makefiles:
> https://thelocalyarn.com/cgi-bin/yarncode/artifact/7a3d32d6264f1bcb
>
> I define my dependencies such that if one of the core files (like
> pollen.rkt) has changed, it triggers a re-render of all documents with
> `raco pollen setup` and then `raco pollen render -p ...`.
>
> The later dependencies check to see if individual Pollen articles (.
> poly.pm) have changed since their .html file was last rendered. If a
> render-of-everything has already been triggered above, then these will
> already be up to date at this point. But if not, any changed articles will
> be re-rendered singly, without parallel processing. (I don't use the -j
> switch when running make.)
>
> So the basic idea is that I give make a very specific dependency tree, and
> rely on it to check those dependencies in a specific order, bringing in the
> new parallel setup and render when it's clear a complete rebuild is needed.
>
> You also have to make sure that the makefile and the Pollen setup cache
> watchlist agree precisely on which are the "core" files that would trigger
> a complete rebuild.
>
> Because I have some Pollen articles that depend on others, I also use
> tricks like "touching" the dependent articles during the evaluation of the
> `root` tag.
> See
> https://thelocalyarn.com/cgi-bin/yarncode/artifact?udc=1&ln=91-92&name=d9318d9822c88d35&udc=1
>    and
> https://thelocalyarn.com/cgi-bin/yarncode/artifact?udc=1&ln=101-111&name=30ceaf46d62ff4c0
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 3:23:37 PM UTC-5, Shrutarshi Basu wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is great. I'm wondering how this should affect Makefile-driven
>> setups? Currently I have a project with a bunch of directories, and a
>> Makefile that runs `raco pollen render` for all the directories, and then
>> publish at the toplevel directory. I've been running it `make -j 4` (since
>> that's how many cores I have), but maybe there's a better way to do it?
>> Should I just use `raco pollen render --recursive` at the toplevel and let
>> pollen figure everything out?
>>
>> Here's a gist of my current Makefile, if it helps:
>> https://gist.github.com/basus/e524fed3a305fe4235ba03eab68c634d
>>
>> --
>> Shrutarshi Basu
>> Basus.me
>> The ByteBaker <http://bytebaker.com> -- computer science is not about
>> computers
>> @basus <http://twitter.com/basus>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Pollen" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pollenpub/d52ce987-16bf-4df1-be52-0b67450c8d22%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pollenpub/d52ce987-16bf-4df1-be52-0b67450c8d22%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Shrutarshi Basu
Basus.me
The ByteBaker <http://bytebaker.com> -- computer science is not about
computers
@basus <http://twitter.com/basus>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pollen" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pollenpub/CA%2BYT8Wip70pTRvr0KV0YL_hGPETRQAUEvEXJ2aKmZiNC01V%3Dbg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to