AFAIK Mozilla and us agreed to remove them from the spec so they can make a performant shadow DOM implementation.
Which version of Chrome did you originally see the problem in? It seems like your example would only work in Canary which still has the :nth-child support, or is there another problem? On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Simon Last <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. Do you know why? They are pretty important to what I'm doing > right now. > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Yvonne Yip <[email protected]> wrote: > >> sorvell alerted me that positional selectors are no longer supported in >> <content>, but the feature hasn't been removed from the implementation. >> Spec: >> http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#satisfying-matching-criteria >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Yvonne Yip <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The issue is with positional selectors which I think is not supported >>> under the shadow DOM polyfill. Your example works as expected under native >>> shadow DOM. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Simon Last <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey guys, >>>> >>>> I've been having a problem with shadow DOM and insertion points. >>>> >>>> I wrote an example with comments here: >>>> http://jsfiddle.net/kXhA4/3/ >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Simon Last >>>> >>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Polymer" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>> >>> >> > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
