I see. Do you know what the differences between the old and new specs are? We are trying this combination because MutationObservers on text nodes on Polymer Platform seem to be broken.
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:22:38 PM UTC-8, Daniel Freedman wrote: > > I believe that stable Chrome has an older version of attachedCallback > named enteredViewCallback. These names changed rather recently in the spec. > > For the record, we don't officially support this combination (prefixed SD > + CE Polyfill) in Polymer because the prefixed shadowRoot is based on a > really old version of the spec. > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Simon Last <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> I'm having some trouble getting the attachedCallback lifecycle callback >> to fire in Chrome stable with native Shadow DOM and the CustomElements >> polyfill. >> >> Example: >> http://jsfiddle.net/Gvncu/ >> >> Thanks! >> >> Simon >> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Polymer" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/565f7f86-a6e4-4561-9d82-f1e386e5d122%40googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/204a690f-2b8f-4472-b9dc-6eaa39d60163%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
