Okay!

Filed: https://github.com/Polymer/HTMLImports/issues/50

On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:10:11 PM UTC-8, Daniel Freedman wrote:
>
> Feel free to file a bug for the polyfill. It will help keep us honest :)
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Jan Miksovsky <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Daniel: Thanks. Should I file a bug for the polyfill, or is that a known 
>> problem?
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:48:58 PM UTC-8, Daniel Freedman wrote:
>>
>>> According to the spec, Imports are supposed to default to UTF-8: 
>>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21275
>>>
>>> Currently the native implementation in Chrome does not force UTF-8: 
>>> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=336698
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Jan Miksovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> To what extent do individual imported HTML files need to specify a 
>>>> charset (e.g., <meta charset="utf-8")?
>>>>
>>>> I have an app that imports a separate .html file defining a Polymer 
>>>> element, and the imported file includes a Unicode glyph. The main HTML 
>>>> file 
>>>> defines a charset, but the included HTML file does not. I'm pretty sure 
>>>> this used to work fine, but now I see the element's glyph rendered as 
>>>> garbage characters. This happens under both current Canary and current 
>>>> production Chrome.
>>>>
>>>> Including an explicit meta charset element in the included element file 
>>>> fixes the problem, so I can work around the problem. But I'm wondering if 
>>>> there'd been some larger philosophical shift or statement made about 
>>>> charsets in imported HTML files. Are elements supposed to implicitly pick 
>>>> up the charset of the importing page, or should every HTML file — 
>>>> including 
>>>> those for elements — always specify a charset?
>>>>
>>>> If this is a bug, I'm happy to file one. (I'd only held back because I 
>>>> can't do this as a simple jsbin.)
>>>>
>>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Polymer" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>> msgid/polymer-dev/8cb9e840-7e71-4c10-8826-f16dcafe28a1%
>>>> 40googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/daeda3de-7085-4e22-9772-5df8bbe48535%40googlegroups.com
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/51a96420-6607-4e2b-a31d-8ac010859308%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to