Thanks.  I'll try put together a sample of the badness for you to inspect.

And +1 for the 'make a given (potentially document level) stylesheet apply 
here' flag.

On Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:19:27 AM UTC-8, Steve Orvell wrote:
>
>
> -Chrome 33
>>   Polymer as a fit, spins and spins then either Chrome dies or loads 
>> after a very intense process (guessing bug?).
>
>
> That sounds like a bug and let's separate it from the design question 
> here. It may be related to loading and/or shimming specific stylesheets to 
> work in the polyfill. We'll be happy to investigate a test case.
>
> I'm interested if there is a proposed solution for global styling.
>
>
> Our team has been discussing this but there's not yet an accepted 
> solution. In the native implementation duplicate style elements are 
> optimized such that they share resources. However, style elements that load 
> remote resources (e.g. @import, link rel) cannot be shared. There's been 
> discussion of adding an api on shadowRoot that says, 'make a given 
> (potentially document level) stylesheet apply here'.
>  
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Justin Merz <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Sorry if this is a repeat,  most of the Global CSS discussions I have 
>> found are quite old in comparison to the age of Polymer.  I have an app 
>> using 50+ polymer-elements and have been using the (now deprecated?) 
>> applyAuthorStyles to bleed in my apps css.  This has and continues to work 
>> when using the polyfill Shadow Dom.  Recently I have been trying to get the 
>> app working in Canary with 'Experimental Web Platform features' turned on. 
>>  The native Shadow Dom is not allowing and global css to bleed in.  I went 
>> ahead and created a single css file which I imported as <link 
>> rel="stylesheet"> inside my <template> tags so I would be doing things the 
>> Web Component way. It should be noted that about 40% of my elements are now 
>> accessing the same css file.  This worked great in Canary but tanked 
>> Polymer in Chrome 33.  Here are my results from some tests:
>>
>> -Chrome 33
>>   Polymer as a fit, spins and spins then either Chrome dies or loads 
>> after a very intense process (guessing bug?).
>>
>> -Chrome 33 vulcanized
>>   Works.
>>
>> -Chrome Canary (35) w/ experimental platform features on
>>   Works
>>
>> I'm interested if there is a proposed solution for global styling.  I 
>> understand the use case of wanting to encapsulate widgets but throwing out 
>> the use of global css because everything is an elements seems off to me. 
>>  I'm just using standard libraries such as bootstrap, font-awesome, 
>> animate.css and it just seems odd that I would have to import every global 
>> css file into every widget or do something like use Grunt to pre-compress 
>> my global css from Bower into a single file (which at least has me only 
>> importing one stylesheet).  Specially when you are building application 
>> specific elements that are never intended to live elsewhere.
>>
>> So, this all said, what approach should I take?  Is the inclusion of a 
>> single 'app' css file the way to go in all of my elements and I should I 
>> look to file a bug for Chrome?  I am missing something about allowing 
>> global css to pass through the Shadow Dom (w/o appending a lot of ^^ to 
>> standard css libraries)?  Or another option that I am missing? 
>>
>> Thanks in advance.  Love the library and all the promise it shows.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/46769bee-b1f2-4c42-bc47-5d1255871f72%40googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/6361c25f-1b13-4dca-a302-f0e9038dae43%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to