Yeah, that's a known bug: crbug.com/336876
@font-face needs to be global right now. You can, for example, include rules with @font-face inside a style element that you include in an HTMLImport. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks guys! /shadow-deep/ selector solves the problem on canary and also > with latest polyfills. > > But I have just encountered another issue with latest canary and native > shadow dom. The @font-face definitions are not penetrating into all the > child elements and their shadow doms. It seems to be only getting applied > if @font-face is defined at the global document level. Is that expected or > a bug? > > > > On Thursday, March 6, 2014 11:28:28 AM UTC-8, Daniel Freedman wrote: > >> The Shadow styling syntax has been split out into its own spec in the css >> working group, which has decided on /shadow/ and /shadow-deep/, (which is >> just a search/replace of ^ and ^^): >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/shadow-styling/ >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Steve Orvell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ^ has changed to /shadow/ >>> ^^ has changed to /shadow-all/ >>> >>> Here's an example to see what's working: >>> >>> http://jsbin.com/pofefune/1/edit >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Daniel Freedman <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Works for me with Version 35.0.1873.0 canary, but not in Version >>>> 35.0.1874.2 canary >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Running into an issue while using ^^ symbols for styling Shadow DOM >>>>> using Canary with "Experimental Web Platform" enabled. The styles are not >>>>> penetrating through to the child nodes. This seems to work fine with >>>>> polyfill. >>>>> >>>>> Here's the example: http://jsbin.com/xevuyuju/9/edit >>>>> >>>>> Is there something that I am missing or is that a bug with native >>>>> Shadom DOM implementation? >>>>> >>>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Polymer" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >>>>> msgid/polymer-dev/09c57583-4947-46d7-b446-ecc8b1f0939d% >>>>> 40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/09c57583-4947-46d7-b446-ecc8b1f0939d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Polymer" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >>>> msgid/polymer-dev/CAAUAVAi-3n85qJAf1_CbW4mksaFiaqe15DXjMNUvtEvPXkpF >>>> wA%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CAAUAVAi-3n85qJAf1_CbW4mksaFiaqe15DXjMNUvtEvPXkpFwA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>> >>> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CA%2BrMWZghc2_A8cor400SbcQSr05hhX1QDy5yA-%2BCfc%2BB2zGFqA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
